The marriage of ignorance and fanaticism can be at once exacerbating and amusing. We have an example of that, thanks to Laurie Cardoza-Moore (LCM) who wrote an article to let the world know just how ignorant and how fanatic she is.
LCM is having a quarrel with
the Reverend Raphael Warnock, but that is none of our concern. What she says
about world affairs and about historical realities, reveal her to be lacking
knowledge in her skull while suffering from an abundance of Jewish fire of
indoctrination in her belly. And that's what is of interest to us.
The article that LCM wrote
came under the title: “No, Raphael Warnock, Jesus was not a Palestinian,” and
the subtitle: “Warnock's teachings are a fusion of anti-Semitic doctrines that
have led to the murder of countless Jews.” It was published on December 29,
2020 in The Washington Times.
The proof that Laurie
Cardoza-Moore was indoctrinated in the Jewish logic of the sewer, is revealed
by the fact that what she says stinks from here to high heaven. Here is an
example: “The word Palestine does not appear one time throughout the New
Testament and the Philistines referenced in the Old Testament became extinct
during biblical times”.
What she is doing here is use
an irrelevance to give credence to a lie. In fact, the irrelevance in her
statement is that the word Palestine does not appear in the New Testament. The
lie is that the Palestinians are not indigenous to Palestine. I'll explain this
in detail in a moment, but first, I must do something LCM neglected to do. It
is to explain the relationship between Philistines and Palestinians.
In all the languages of the
region, be they modern or ancient, Palestine is pronounced “Falasteen” even in
Hebrew, which is written as such “פלאסטין". This means the two words are one and the same. According
to LCM, Falasteen appears in the Old Testament but not the New. By that, she is
suggesting that the Palestinians were recognized as being indigenous to Palestine
from the beginning of time till about 2000 years ago, and that by some magic,
they ceased to be so recognized.
What happened there? Well, there
can only be one explanation. Those who wrote the New Testament were not writing
history; they were writing about their new religion. It is one they considered
to be so universal, they took it to the four corners of the world, leaving
Falasteen behind and talking about Jesus.
Another distortion LCM
injected into her article without explaining a thing about it, is that she said
Yasser Arafat was Egyptian, a clear attempt to negate his Palestinian identity.
Those who do this, base their lie on the fact that Arafat was born in Egypt to
Palestinian parents who found themselves in a foreign country when the time
came for delivery. This is a situation that happens even more often these days,
causing a great deal of controversy in America but nowhere else, as to which
nationality the child belongs.
LCM made the choice for Yasser
Arafat, and said he was Egyptian because he was born in Egypt, thus denied him
the Palestinian identity. What the poor woman did not realize, however, is that
in so doing, she dug herself a trap and fell into it. Here is what she did:
Immaculately conceived, Jesus
had no human father. Thus, he could only take the nationality of the place
where he was born or that of his mother. According to LCM and the Old
Testament, the land where Jesus was born, belonged to the Philistines (meaning
Palestine) and so remained at least till the advent of Christianity and the New
Testament, which did not happen till after Jesus was crucified. Thus, LCM must
admit that Jesus was born a Palestinian –– like said Yasser Arafat and the
Reverend Raphael Warnock.
Not knowing that she was
talking from the bottom of the trap in which she fell, LCM made the following
falsehood:
“The life of Jesus stood in
direct contradiction to Arafat's narrative, making it difficult to recruit
Christians to his cause. So, he rewrote the Bible and rebranded Jesus as a
Palestinian. Institutions were established in Bethlehem where Palestinian
activists cloaked in Christianity peddled their own newer testament”.
But now that it was proven
Jesus was indeed a Palestinian, and that Yasser Arafat was correct, all that
Laurie Cardoza-Moore is accusing him of is false accusation. And since LCM's
stance is the opposite of Arafat's, it must be that she stands accused of
cloaking herself in Christianity and peddling her own newer testament.
But why would she do that? We
don't have to go far to find the answer; it is right there in the title she
gave to herself. It reads as follows:
“Laurie Cardoza-Moore is the
founder of an Evangelical Christian organization that educates Christians about
their Biblical responsibility to stand with Israel and the Jewish people
against the rise of global anti-Semitism”.
Translated into honest English, this says that by committing deliberate or inadvertent mistakes, LCM spreads anti-Semitism while pretending to fight it. And this has been her lifelong passion.