Originally, “body language” used to signify non-verbal communication such as shrugging something that is said, to mean that you’re not impressed. Increasingly, however, the term body language has been taking on an expansive definition.
To
see that, let's say I tell you the story of a friend who got involved in a
complex business transaction, one in which a Jew played a minor role. Instead
of telling the story in the sequence it was relayed to me, I make the Jew a ubiquitous
figure by diminishing the role that others have played. With this alone, I
already began a body language that can be taken even further than that.
For
example, whenever the Jew’s name appears in a sentence, I mention my friend’s
fear of being swindled without accusing the Jew of anything. But by repeatedly
juxtaposing the Jew’s name and the word “swindle” in the same sentence, I make
it sound like this Jew and all Jews are swindlers to be feared. This is a verbal
communication in which body language is added to tell a non-verbal lie.
The
Jews are masters at telling this kind of lies. What makes their stories significant
is that they lay the background for it well ahead of time using respected
existing institutions. Two such institutions are the White House and the State
Department. Using their well-known methods of getting the American President to
mouth off what his Jewish speechwriters include in his speeches, and using
their known methods of getting the State Department to express bizarre
opinions, the Jews create a narrative in which Hamas is called a “terrorist”
organization, and Israel is called a “strong ally” that needs to be
strengthened with unlimited appropriations of American money and weapons.
When
these two locutions are repeated time after time by politicians and
commentators, the word “Hamas” becomes synonymous with “terror” whereas the
word “Israel” conjures up the image of the wounded juggernaut that America must
help so that he may help America. It is a self-contradictory concept that is
nevertheless useful because it confuses and hides the fact that Israel is the
albatross around America’s neck, a burden that’s dragging it down ever deeper
into the Jewish sewer of total irrelevance.
You
get a sense of all that when you go over the article that came under the title:
“The International Community is Encouraging Hamas to Attack Israel Again — and Again,” written by Alan Dershowitz, and published
on May 28, 2021 in the online Jewish publication, Algemeiner.
After an introductory paragraph, you can see
how Alan Dershowitz took advantage of the work that was done over the years,
turning Hamas into a symbol of terror, even if the whole world, according to
Dershowitz himself, rejects that proposition. Here is how he began the
discussion: “Despite Hamas being a terrorist organization…” This being a given,
according to the trope created by body language, Alan Dershowitz could safely
go on to state, “[Hamas] that fired 4,000 rockets at Israeli civilian targets
from behind its human shields,” but then, he felt compelled to lament, which he
did as follows: “much of the world has stood behind Hamas”.
Now
that the world has spoken, should this not indicate that the case is closed,
that Israel should accept the verdict handed down by humanity, and should she
not comply with what the world has ordered? Well yes, this is the way things
normally unfold when all the parties involved in a dispute are civilized. But
Israel is involved in this dispute, and if the Jews who sit at its helm were
capable of civilized behavior, there would not have been a dispute in the first
place.
Instead,
the case would have been settled early in the twentieth century. Arabs and Jews
would now be living side by side in harmony as they did for thousands of years,
especially during those moments when the Jews were subjected to pogroms and
inquisitions in Europe, and they sought refuge in the Arab countries where they
were welcomed with open arms. But this time, the Jews came as two terror
organizations (Irgun and Hagenah) armed with bombs and guns, and bent on
grabbing what they could rather than accept what the well-known Arab generosity
would have allocated for them.
Instead
of speaking this truth, incorporating it in a new narrative that would be used
to overcome the bad blood that has developed between Arabs and Jews over the
last century, Alan Dershowitz did something entirely different. He relied on
the false trope that was created about Hamas being a terrorist organization,
linked it with another false trop about Iran being a state sponsor of
terrorism, and composed an orgy of lies about those two highly civilized
ancient nations.
This
done, Dershowitz finished the article in a very expected Jewish manner. Here is
how he put it:
“There
is no other area in which the international community acts in such antisemitic
manner. Yes, antisemitic. There is no other explanation for why Israel is
singled out for this special treatment. The world’s obsession is on Israel,
precisely because it is the nation state of the Jewish people. In the face of
growing antisemitism throughout the world, the time has come for the
international community to stop encouraging Iran and Hamas to persist in their
efforts to end the existence of ‘the little Satan’”.
It was the creation of those tropes that made it possible for Alan Dershowitz to compose that false narrative by ignoring the reality that it is Israel which singles itself out with never-ending acts of colonial type apartheid that the world came to regard as abhorrent even before it agreed to give the Jews a home out of pity for their inability to mimic minimum human civilized behavior.