At the start of the Jewish conquest of America, one of the techniques used by the rabbis to confuse the Americans, was to accuse the individuals they did not like, of using code words meant to spread the antisemitism that will lead to a second holocaust. Everybody got scared; they fled the public square and left it for the Jews to monopolize.
This
Jewish cultural coup started the Politically Correct (PC) movement that begot
the woke subculture we face today. Even though Jews started the movement, they
rejected the subculture that resulted from it. However, they used a consequence
of the PC movement to accomplish what they consider their most sacred duty. It
is that of having the government recognize them as being the chosen ones, and
treat them as such by imposing their will on the rest of society through the
enactment of Jewish specific laws.
But
how are the Jews accomplishing all this? They are doing it by getting
government officials to use code words and tropes that seem innocuous, even
logical on the surface, but have serious practical consequences not seen or
understood by the gullible and the intellectually lazy. The sole aim of the
tropes is to institutionalize the principles that lead to making the government
see and accept whose life must be protect and whose life can be neglected.
A
perfect example that illustrates all of this, came in the form of an article
written under the title: “Will Arms Sale to Israel be Delayed While It Defends
Against Attacks?” and the subtitle: “A congressional request for delay tests
the Biden administration.” It was penned by Elliott Abrams, and published on
May 18, 2021 on the website of The Council on Foreign Relations.
Consider
this passage: “Thus far in the fighting between Hamas and Israel, the
administration has remained clear in its support for Israel’s right to defend
itself. It has also clearly stated the moral distinctions between a democracy
defending civilians and a terrorist group deliberately attacking them”.
The
mention of Israel having the right to defend itself without adding the qualifier,
“like everyone else,” puts out the first hint that the American administration
cares about the lives of those whom Israel is defending but not those in whose
name Hamas is fighting — regardless as to who is right and who is wrong in this
dispute. Abrams did not stop here. He went on to reinforce that hint by making
more explicit who is preferred over whom. Here is that passage:
“But
now the winds are shifting. Democratic senators are calling for an immediate
cease-fire — a statement of neutrality. This is moral equivalence: no distinction
is made between democratic government and terrorist; a rancid taste on United
Nations resolutions”.
Here,
the hint was amplified to make a distinction between the one that purports to
be America’s friend, and the one that United Nations views as the friend of
humanity. In effect then, not only does Elliott Abrams state that Israel is
above Hamas in America’s eyes; he says it is above the rest of humanity. As if
this were not enough reinforcement, Abrams proceeded to state the following:
“Worse
yet, far worse, is a letter spearheaded by House Foreign Affairs Committee
chairman Gregory Meeks [an African American] who in 2020 was against
conditionality in aid to Israel. But now Meeks is taking a different view. He
called on members of the committee to discuss a deal to sell arms to Israel”.
What
is clear in this passage is that “worse” is made “far worse” in Abrams’s eyes
by the fact that the interlocutor this time, is an African American legislator
who dared to go against the Jewish line. And this is when you pause and ask: What’s
going on in the heads and hearts of the Jews that so desperately want to be
recognized by the US and other governments, as being separate and superior to
their own publics?
The
Jews want this privilege so badly, they are willing to take any consequence
that may afflict them if that will get them what they crave, even if it means a
pogrom or another holocaust.
The
answer to the earlier question is that being chosen and placed above humanity
is the bedrock of the Jewish religious system of beliefs. If you take that
away, theirs will not be a religion that can stand as equal with Christianity
and Islam. It will be just another collection of exotic superstitions to be
tolerated and nothing more.
Most
importantly, if the Jews lose that privilege, the government will not be
compelled to accept the inequality that the lives of Jews must be protect
whereas the lives of Palestinians can be neglected.
And this, in turn will allow the government to do what the United Nations does, which is to treat Israel like everyone else with no special privileges that will distinguish it as the home of the chosen ones. And that's what the Jewish leaders dread.