When at the start of the Cold War, the Americans embarked on a program to assassinate foreign leaders and overthrow foreign governments from Asia to Latin America to Africa, the prevailing view among the pundits was that America could do these things because it was strong and capable. In their view, the program of assassinations was a good thing.
It
did not take long for the Israelis to emulate America. They started sending
letter bombs to scientists working in the Arab countries on the high
technologies of the time, such as rockets and electronics. The Israelis also
recruited treasonous Arab Jews, and had them sabotage vital installations in
the countries of their birth, as well as sabotage the relations between those
countries and the foreign powers. A noteworthy incident in this regard was the
blowing of the American embassy in Cairo by treasonous Jews working for Israel.
Their aim was to sour the relations between the two countries.
When
you combine this picture to the existing reality at the time, which was that of
a pair of Jewish terror organizations murdering British officials in Palestine
while engaging in the wholesale extermination of unarmed Palestinian farmers to
steal their land and other properties — you develop a good understanding of the
history of that region; a history that has led to the current situation.
So,
the question is this: What about the current situation? The answer is that it
is a continuation of what the Jews were doing in the past, as well as their
desperate call for America to renew what it was doing. You can get a sense of what
this is all about when you go over the article that came under the title: “For
diplomacy to work, Iran must understand that t cannot overplay its hand,” written
by Dennis Ross, and published on April 26, 2021 in The Washington Post.
Clobbered
many times in the past for advising America to warn, threaten and attack those
he chose to call America’s enemies, Dennis Ross has adopted a clever way to say
the same kind of thing without sounding too hawkish. What he did is use a
reverse approach. That is, instead of laying out what America must do, he is
now laying out what Iran must not do. In fact, this is the approach he took in
his latest article.
An
old fantasy representing the bedrock of the Jewish argument, was that America
should maintain the sanctions because Iran was on the verge of imploding, and
was therefore desperate to reach an agreement, at which time it will accept anything
that’s imposed on it in return for sanctions relief. This turned out to be as
real as a desert mirage. But unable to go on advising America without it,
Dennis Ross came up with something comparable to start his presentation. As
absurd as it sounds, the following is the result:
“If
there was any doubt that Iran wants and needs sanctions relief, it was removed
on April 11. Rather than using what seemed like Israeli sabotage at Natanz,
Iran’s largest uranium enrichment site, as pretext to walk away from the talks
in Venna, the Iranians remain engaged [in the talks.]”
Dennis
Ross needed to say those things at the start of his presentation so that he may
spew all the nonsense that he wanted throughout the article, and when nearing
the end of the piece, recommend the same old threat about, “all options being
on the table,” whichever way he phrased it. See for yourself:
“If
nothing else, the Biden administration needs to show that while it strongly
favors diplomacy, the Iranians must also do their part, and if they make
diplomacy impossible, the United States will exercise other options. From this
standpoint, what the Israelis have reportedly done in sabotaging Natanz is not
necessarily bad”.
Another
old trick that Dennis Ross could not part with, is the sleight of hand that
comes in the form of ambiguity. The way it works is that Israel puts out a
rumor about itself and lets the army of prostitutes who masquerade as
legitimate pundits, play up the rumor to the point that it becomes a reality in
the mind of many people. This happened, for example, with the issue of Israel having
an arsenal of nuclear weapons.
This
time, Dennis Ross used that trick in a novel way. He made it sound like it was
the nation of America that willingly accepted to play the role of prostitute so
as to help Israel be ambiguous, and confuse the Iranians. Here is the evidence
of Dennis Ross’s crime. See for yourself:
“If
the Iranians believe that the US knew about the Natanz attack and did nothing
to block it, the signal to them is that the US will raise the costs of what
they are doing and will disrupt it. That public posture of America not
distancing itself from Israel can help reestablish deterrence of the Iranians.
US diplomacy has little chance of succeeding if the Iranians have lost their
fear of the US and believe it is so anxious to avoid conflict, that increasing
the pressure on the nuclear issue will pay off”.
It is time for someone in the American government to publicly tell Dennis Ross and everyone like him to shut the fuck up, and stop pretending he can talk in America’s name.