Double vision, one blind and one distorted

 Imagine two gentlemen having a conversation concerning a hypothetical situation that was brought about by the following questions: If you are at odds with someone who is so powerful he can harm you in any fashion he wants to do it. Would you prefer that he detains you for 50 days? Or would you prefer that he blows you to smithereens with a 500-pound bomb?

 

Well, my dear reader, because neither of the gentlemen will answer the question, I pose it to you: If you are at odds with someone that can harm you. Would you prefer that he detains you for 50 days or that he blows you to smithereens with a 500-pound bomb?

 

If you say you prefer to be blown to pieces, you need to call your favorite shrink, and immediately book an appointment because your answer says you suffer from a Masada-like death wish, thus present great danger to yourself and those surrounding you.

 

But what’s this all about, anyway? Since you asked, here is what it’s about. It is about Clifford D. May writing an article in which he comments on the conduct of the Gaza War, and the response to it from the human masses populating the world today as well as from a number of their leaders. May’s article came under the title “Trading terrorists for hostages” and the subtitle: “Israel agrees to a bad deal for a good reason.” It was published on November 28, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

What follows is a compilation of what Clifford May is saying, and what he quoted others as saying. Here is what he began with:

 

“In what legal or moral universe is there any equivalence between the two?”

 

This is the question that has preoccupied the Jews for centuries. Their lifelong indoctrination being rooted in the belief that they are so superior to all others, their sayings and doings can never be compared to what anyone else says or does—they treat any such attempt as a sacrilegious undertaking the way that Christians treat the breaking of a religious taboo.

 

But the reality being that since the defeat of the Nazi ideology, human beings around the globe have rejected the notion of one race or one religion being superior to all others—the Jewish moral assertion which is shoved down the throat of humanity by all kinds of subtle tricks—has brought them nothing but more contempt, more hate and more of what they call antisemitism.

 

This is why Clifford May and those like him cannot even begin to understand why they sink deeper into the cesspool of depravity when they reveal the extent to which their morality has deteriorated. And so, they continue to do it to themselves every time that they express thoughts such as the one given by Clifford May in his article:

 

“Hamas has spotted something about the modern world that has meant that instead of demonstrations against their hostage-taking, the largest demonstrations globally have taken place against the victim, Israel”.

 

And thoughts such as these:

 

“More than a few European leaders personify this ‘modern world.’ Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez announced: ‘If the European Union does not recognize the independent State of Palestine, Spain will make its own decision.’ Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo instructed: ‘The only way out of this conflict is dialogue.’ If Israelis are thinking strategically, they’ll resist that pressure, understanding now more vividly than ever how much of the ‘modern world’ neither opposes Hamas’ ambitions nor believes that Jewish lives matter”.

 

It is that the moral compass of these people has been so mutilated by the toxic religion they adopted long ago, what guides them now is a sort of blindness that makes them see half of reality while hiding the other half. This is why they consider the suffering of hostages who lived for 50 days deprived of liberty and then released to find their way into the arms of their loved ones, is so immense — it more than dwarfs the suffering of Palestinian families who are incinerated alive in their homes by Jewish bombs raining down on them — it completely hides it from their vision.

 

The Jewish leaders who now call themselves Zionists, may be intelligent enough to see where their actions will lead their people thus reverse course, or the functioning of their thinking process has been so reduced, they will continue to drag their people to a Masada-like annihilation.

 

Those leaders are on their way to fulfilling the wish of the man who dreamed of a Final Solution not for Hamas but for the Jews.

Is this a strong horse or a lame jackass?

 Many of the Americans that travelled to the Middle East as journalists and were known for their hawkish bent, or were sent to the region assigned to fight the Judeo-American wars that never end—returned to America impressed by a regional thinking which says that people prefer to stand with a strong horse.

 

And so, the career journalists as well as the now-discharged soldiers of the American military who were given the opportunity to air their views in public, repeatedly lauded that Mideastern saying in the conversations they had. What they did after that was build on the thought in such manner as to reinforce their long held hawkish views.

 

In so doing, however, these people relied heavily on the Jewish method of advancing a cause. That is, they neglected to adopt a long term strategy in favor of hopscotching over tactical responses when tackling the momentary events they thought would be useful to them.

 

This approach also led those people to believe that they could use the Ronald Reagan stance which he developed around the need to revamp the American military. The philosophy employed there came down to saying that you can preserve the peace only by building the strength that will deter the enemy from provoking or attacking you.

 

When all these ideas come together in the mind of an individual whose self-esteem has not yet developed to a high enough level, they produce a character such as Tom Cotton who believes that no American has existed or will ever exist that can equal a Jew. Condemned by the thinking planted into his head to the effect that he can only carry political water for the Judeo-Israeli establishment, Cotton reduced his own role in life to doing just that. But how does it all work in real life?

 

We were given an example as to how that works in real life when, on a talk show last Sunday, Tom Cotton gave a revealing response to a pertinent question. He was asked what he thought Israel should do now in the matter of the ongoing war between its military and Hamas. Without a moment’s hesitation, the former American soldier who travelled far and wide to kill the people that refused to obey America, responded by saying, in effect, that neither he nor America are qualified to tell Israel what it can and cannot do with the steady stream of weapons and cash it receives from America.

 

How did a relationship that is so disgusting at its core, develop between a superpower that the world used to worship, and a rundown entity that managed to make the world hate it once again? Well, we must answer that question by first observing that what happened took place not by accident but by design.

 

That entity adopted the name Israel, having stolen Palestine from its indigenous Palestinian people, and populating it with losers who were summoned to it from around the world by agents of the old and new colonial powers. This was a time when those powers were scheming to perpetuate their dominion over a world that proved to be rich in natural resources which they desperately needed to feed the newly developing Industrial Revolution.

 

Believing that they committed the perfect crime against humanity for which there will be no serious consequences to them, the colonial powers ‘slept at the switch’ so to speak. What they did not realize was that Israel was not the tool they believed they had in their hands, but that they were the tools which the Jews had in their hands. Worse, the colonial powers discovered that the Jews were working on a scheme for world dominance that made their own scheme look like child play.

 

Of the many examples from which we can choose to demonstrate the kind of tricks that the Jews have been pulling on mankind for centuries, we choose one that is pertinent to the current situation. It is the Jewish formulation of the expression: “Israel has the right to defend itself.” What is absent in this expression, is the notion that self-defense is a universal right. But because of the glaring absence, the expression sounds like it asserts only Israel has the right to self-defense.

 

We can tell that such assertion was meant to be reflected by the expression because the propagation of the latter was made to follow the traditional Jewish method of stuffing in the mouths of others what they want the elites and the public to recite as given, and without the slightest deviation. This being the case, anyone who might complete the thought by saying it as follows: “Israel has the right to defend itself, and so do the Palestinians,” would be cancelled before they had the time to finish the sentence.

 

Two different things happen when devious expressions of that kind land in the ears of elites, and those of the general public. The elites fall in love with the truncated content of the expressions because they are given out in the form of a bumper sticker, a form that used to amuse them while growing up dreaming that someday, they too will join the political crowd and come up with attractive bumper stickers of their own.

 

As to the general public, they juxtapose what is meant by that expression with images of the Israel Terrorist Force (ITF) bombing Palestinian families to smithereens in their own homes, and calling such gruesome acts self-defense. And so, the ordinary people tell their elites they must end their association with the Jewish entity that made of America the laughingstock of the world.

 

The strong horse is now a lame jackass. Will someone endowed with self-respect rise in America and save it from the destructive hands of the Jews? Time will tell.

They are back shooting themselves in the foot

 Clifford D. May’s latest column has him admit that United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was not wrong when he observed that “Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack on Israelis did not happen in a vacuum.” This a very astute observation on the part of both men. I take it without reservation.

 

Unfortunately, however, what happened immediately following the Clifford May admission, is that his subsequent observations and the related arguments collapsed one assertion he made after the other. It is that consciously or inadvertently, it was the writer himself that highlighted the collapse by accusing the Secretary-General of the following:

 

“Neglecting to mention the multiple ways the U.N. encouraged Hamas’s orgy of mass murder [and other things]; the U.N.’s efforts to demonize and delegitimize Israel; and its campaign to make Israel an international scapegoat, whipping boy, and pariah.” We’ll get to those other things in a moment. But for now it must be said that;

 

It is important to note first of all that Clifford May was the one who neglected to mention that killing 14,000 Palestinians and counting, is a bigger orgy committed by the Jews than the 1,400 Jews who were killed by Hamas. Secomd of all, “the UN effort to demonize and delegitimize Israel; and its campaign to make Israel an international scapegoat, whipping boy, and pariah” is a mild punishment compared to the genocidal campaign that was unleashed on the Palestinians by Israel and its American ally.

 

We now turn our attention to the things that were mentioned but not elaborated on earlier. Clifford May says they were rape, and child-stealing. We begin by looking at the second part of that statement.

 

The writer chose to use the expression child-stealing instead of kidnapping despite the fact that kidnapping was used properly at the start of this accusation. Why did he switch? He did because it was observed that kidnapping is made of two words: kid and nap. The reality is that kidnapping of grownups is done rarely if at all whereas kidnapping children has been the norm since Moses and his click instructed the Jews to kidnap and harm children in front of their parents to make them suffer as brutally as possible.

 

As to the accusation of rape, this is a stark example of the incompetent Jews doing themselves in as they try to score cheap points by stealing and using what ends up shooting them in the foot. What happened in this case, is that the Jewish propaganda machine failed to convince humanity that Hamas had employed brutal methods as it retaliated against Israel for decades of brutal occupation.

 

Not knowing what else to say or do to diminish the values of a rising Hamas that was getting stronger by the day, the Jews looked around and discovered that the situation in Sudan’s Darfur region was flaring up again. Vivid descriptions of the atrocities committed there were advanced by observers from around the world. Rape being among the descriptions, the Jews stole the horrific images created by the warring local tribes, and falsely ascribed them to Hamas.

 

As predicted long ago, and repeated over and over again on these pages and elsewhere, engaging in this kind of libel against the innocent, forces the world to despise the Jews. This was demonstrated yet again by the millions of people who descended into the streets of cities and towns to express their dismay. And many of these people warned that their dismay was fast turning into an expression of antisemitism.

 

And yet, there is more to this story. It is that the current situation in Darfur did not happen in a vacuum either. It has roots that go back to 2007. This was a time when the Jews of America and the world huddled under the command of Jewish Central to plot a series of dirty tricks by which to use American power, and subvert the Arab and Muslim countries.

 

The plotters failed in some places but succeeded in Sudan, having instigated a civil war in Darfur and taken advantage of it by convincing a cyber outfit to get involved in the anti-Arab propaganda by linking with the Holocaust Memorial in America, and making the situation look and sound like the “Northern White Arabs” were extermination the “Southern Back Africans.” Needless to say that no sane person in the world believed any of what the Jewish pathological liars were spewing.

 

So now that the likes of Clifford May cannot resist taking advantage of the horror they created in Darfur years ago — and continues to consume the lives of helpless people — they are back to behaving true to character, and shooting themselves in the foot like they always did.

The invisible meanings in heated rhetoric

 Look at the following two statements. What would you say they have in common?

 

First statement: We’ll do it again and again and again.

 

Second statement:  We don’t want to see hospitals become battlegrounds.

 

What the two statements have in common is that each came at the end of a long line of thoughts. Missing in their locution are the meanings that the debaters included in them either implicitly or explicitly at the time they pronounced them. These were substantial meanings that nevertheless remain invisible now. So, the question to ask is this: can we forensically restore to these statements their original full meanings?

 

The answer to that question is yes, we can. But to do so successfully, we need to identify the authors who spoke those words; also need to probe their previous sayings to see how closely they resemble or differ from their recent statements. To that end, here is what we know about the person who communicated the first statement. He is a Hamas official who must have been asked if his organization would respond the same way to the same provocations that led Hamas to respond the way it did this time. As can be seen, the Hamas answer was an honest and emphatic yes.

 

As to the person who communicated the second answer, it must be said that more than one did. Each represented the American administration of Joe Biden in one capacity or another, but could just as well have admitted they were all echoing the voice of the foreign entity calling itself Israel. Recalling the manner of speaking employed by the Biden crowd, a disturbing reality comes to mind immediately. It is that when it comes to the so-called defense of Israel, the demarcation line separating America from Israel, has been so blurred, it is impossible to clearly ascribe a statement to one entity or the other.

 

This makes it so that the statement, “We don’t want to see hospitals become battlegrounds,” is a dubious pronouncement that carries with it an escape hatch which can be used by the Biden administration in case the Jews of Israel do what comes naturally to them, which is to commit the war crime and stick the responsibility to the American administration of Joe Biden.

 

In fact, Biden and his crowd resorted to that manner of speaking because they found themselves caught on the horns of a dilemma. On the one hand, they don’t want to appear restraining Israel which would be disastrous for American politics if Israel lost the war to Hamas. On the other hand, they don’t want to take responsibility for the genocide they know has always been the Jewish intention to commit. Thus, the use of the  statement of infamy which carries with it the instruction: You have the green light to proceed with your genocidal plan to blow up the Shifa Hospital, but when you’ll do it, we’ll deny responsibility.

 

Neither the Joe Biden administration, which is the current governing body in America, nor the previous administrations going back several decades, can deny the role that each played in bringing the Middle East to the lamentable state in which it finds itself at this time.

 

That plan was implemented slowly but surely, one step at a time by following instructions that the Jews wrote about in the book they call the Old Testament, handed to them by one named Moses. Whereas many people were fooled into believing this was a book of religion transmitting the words of God to the human race, more and more people are coming around to the realization that God cannot be anything close to the way that the Jews describe Him.

 

Realizing that it was fooled excessively for too long by the most destructive force ever to plague Planet Eart, humanity is beginning to ascribe blame where blame is due. Right now, the blame is pinned on America, more so on the chest of Joe Biden who will not escape the designation: Genocide Joe.

Mike Pompeo, a dagger in the heart of America

 First, let me ask you to clear your mind of everything you might have heard previously about the likes of Donald Trump claiming to have the right to govern the United States as a dictator because he was elected by the people. It is that this man comes with too much baggage, thus confuses the issue.

 

Second, let me ask you to imagine and weigh the claims of two seemingly well adjusted citizens that happen to stand on opposite sides of the issue.

 

One citizen says that the glory of the Liberal Democratic system of governance resides in the fact that it remains open to inputs and adjustments even after the choice for president has been made by the people in a fair and square election.

 

The other citizen agrees that such may be the glory of Liberal Democracy, but goes on to explain that the system can also be – in fact, often is – taken advantage of by foreign adversaries who seek to harm it, and by domestic grabbers who seek to exploit it.

 

Whatever argument you decide carries a higher level of merit, there is Mike Pompeo—who served at one time as Secretary of State; another time as CIA Director—reiterating once again as he did during a recent interview, his long held opinion on the matter.

 

Taking on the hundreds of insiders who wrote a letter denouncing President Biden’s ‘Beyond Infinity’ support for Israel’s genocide of Palestinians using American funds and American weapons of mass destruction, Pompeo articulated a mindless argument to the effect that the President acts like a dictator when he listens to American insiders—be they whistleblowers or just concerned citizens—yet behaves in a perfectly kosher manner when he bends under the pressure of Jewish groups, and responds by giving Israel what it needs, and what it has no need for.

 

It is obvious therefore, that being indoctrinated in the belief that Zionism represents the highest form of human existence, Mike Pompeo shows every sign that when he is forced to look at the two sides of an issue, one being Jewish; the other something else, he sees the Jewish side as being so massively important, it shrinks by comparison everything else to near the vanishing point.

 

We must conclude that Mike Pompeo has been brainwashed into seeing, at the exclusion of everything else, the importance of what the Judeo-Israeli plan proposes to accomplish. Typically designed in accordance with the Jewish cultural instruction describing a chain of links that always lead to disaster, Pompeo has come to fanatically believe that if Israel’s Terrorist Force (ITF) ends its killing of Palestinian families, Hamas will give enough impetus to such groups as Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, ISIS and others, it and they will work together to destroy the world one link at a time.

 

But given that Al Qaeda and ISIS that came into being spontaneously, did so on their own—have now vanished. Also, given that Hamas and Hezbollah which came into being by the design and work of Israel—remain active on the scene, no human that can think at the level of a monkey or higher, will miss seeing that the danger to the world and America comes not from these groups but from the Jews who pretend to be American but are infinitely more loyal to Israel — so much so, in fact, that they continually snatch American flesh and blood, and send them to Israel.

 

Coddling and appeasing the Jews has diminished America and continues to do so. This means that the salvation of America will only come when the country’s non-Jewish leaders will develop the spine to stand up firmly and say to the Jews: Enough is enough. Go play your destructive games somewhere else.

When TV reporters turn advocates for one side

 I spent a good part of the day watching American television to see and assess how the media covers the unfolding events in the Middle East. I could not divorce what I was absorbing from what I had learned about American television decades ago.

 

I must say in this regard that on the whole, the comparison yielded a positive result in the sense that most of the media showed signs indicating they want to present the events in a balanced way. Whether or not they fully succeeded is another matter.

 

Despite those signs, however, someone that watches American television for the first time, and sees its coverage of the war on Gaza, will come to believe that the broadcasts emanate in Israel, more specifically in the ministry of military propaganda of that faraway entity.

 

In fact, seeing Israelis in uniform, who speak in perfect America accent, “explain” what Israel is doing and hopes to accomplish, no one can escape the conclusion that in this case, the Judeo-Zionists of the world owned and operated the America media outlets. It is that not one television channel, and not one show that I watched was rid of Americans in Israeli uniform, who pretended to be full-blooded Israelis fighting for the survival of an imagined people at risk of being made to disappear.

 

Amid the repetitive deliveries of this kind of programing, one outlet stood then and stands now as the exception. It is not an exception to welcome, let alone to cheer about; it is an exception to weep about for, it alone seems capable of dragging America into the house of moral prostitution. That outlet is Fox News which became so desperate trying to reverse the trend of a growing antisemitism in America and the world, it committed an act that sent journalism back to the Dark Ages.

 

What the Fox News network did was force all its reporters to stop reporting on the events as they unfold, and speak instead in the language of the spin doctors whose training has given them the power to make anyone believe that an Israeli soldier who is taken prisoner by Hamas, is an act of terrorism whereas a Palestinian family that is blown to kingdom come by an Israel bomb, is an act of Jewish heroism that the world needs to learn about and emulate.

 

In fact, a lamentable example is that of a correspondent, stationed in Israel who used to give the news in a straightforward manner, you see him now and hear him perform like a cog would when placed in the massive Judeo-Israeli propaganda machine, and made to spin like a dog that’s trying to catch its tail. He spews the spun lies that misinform and disinform the audiences that trust Fox News.

 

But there again, you find the exception that makes the rule. In fact, there are more than one exception working for that network. They try everyday to render unto Cezar what is Cezar’s to remain faithful to their profession while being loyal to an employer that is more fanatic about the need to kill Palestinians than Hamas is fanatic about beating the Israeli military machine.

 

Among those exceptions, one anchor at Fox News, who is a lawyer by training, stands out as remarkable. She is Shannon Bream who is animated by a disciplined mind and a logic that’s enjoyable to follow. If I have an advice to give her, it is that her polemics are so dense, she needs to slow down when speaking to give the listeners time to savour what she is saying.

Imagine life in Hiroshima underground

 The beauty about the human mind is that it can imagine a setting that never happened, put humans in that setting and watch them navigate their way through the vagaries of the situation that’s surrounding them to stay alive, and if possible even thrive.

 

Science fiction writers are among the most imaginative of all. Some among them play the role of futurists when they imagine a future for humankind that is sometimes pleasant, but often predicts dire consequences for humanity. This can happen, they warn, due to an abrupt change that would have come about naturally or come about in the aftermath of a nuclear exchange between the nations.

 

Well, my friend, we have a situation on Planet Earth that is unfolding in such a grotesque manner at this moment, you don’t need to have the imaginative power of a science fiction writer to picture the situation as it is now for the people who must live with it, and what might develop for the future of the human race if things are not corrected immediately.

 

All that you need to begin with is recall the history of World War Two. More specifically recall the name of two cities: Hiroshima and Dresden. The first was destroyed by a nuclear bomb, the second by a relentless carpet bombing that turned it into a pile of rubble. Both times, the mass destroyer was America — the same America that is now supplying the Jews with enough bombs to begin the process of planetary destruction which they believe is God’s command for them to accomplish before He’ll take the trouble of saving them and rewarding them with the ownership deed of Planet Earth.

 

Ground zero for the start of that operation was chosen by the Jews of America and Israel to be Gaza, a province of now occupied Palestine. Lacking the fantasized about nuclear bomb, Israel resorted to the use of carpet bombing, a policy that forced the inhabitants of Gaza to live underground. To make this possible, Gazans built a city underground that is not different in layout from the above ground cities.

 

That is, in the same way that a normal city needs streets and highways to connect its parts, the underground city of Gaza has tunnels that connect its parts. Also, in the same way that the subway tunnels of a normal city are made to run under buildings such as hospitals and schools by necessity, the tunnels of underground Gaza run under hospitals and schools.

 

This is where the spin doctors of the America-Israel propaganda machine see ample opportunities to lie; to uninform and disinform the public. They did so not long ago when they said they discovered an entrance to the Gaza underground city that was only a few hundred meters away from a hospital. Big deal; this is like complaining about the existence of a subway station a few hundred meters away from a hospital or a university it was specifically built to serve.

 

That propaganda act must be seen as a sign that was waved inadvertently by the genocidal Jewish evildoers who are willing to kill those that refuse to bow to them. They tell false stories about the noble Hamas freedom fighters who are willing to die if this will give their own people the freedom that is the human right of everyone everywhere.

 

And so, what we must expect to see from now on, is the American-Jewish spin doctors who will use everything and anything they discover to make a big deal about it and paint false pictures of the situation in Gaza, but failing to fool the masses in America or anywhere else, yet managing to fool the braindead zombies of the American congressional cesspool, a once venerated institution that turned itself under Jewish tutelage into a disgusting thing — so disgusting in fact, it is beginning to repulse away from it the close friends it used to rely on for its military and economic securities.

 

The situation in Gaza continues to unfold unabated as America continues to supply Israel with the ammunition it says it needs to kill Palestinians. The world is watching while tranced by the incredulous horror it sees unfolding under its nose. And the future that will result from all this, is being etched on the tablet that will be handed to posterity so as to pass the judgments that will separate the evildoers from the nobles and put everyone in its place either in the pantheon of fame or that of the infamous.

 

Where do you want to go, America?

The below hospital war room that never was

 The French expression “coup de grace” was adopted by the English language without modification, and often used to convey the same meaning. The closest translation of that expression into English, using a purely English approach, would reference the expression “putting someone out of their misery”.

 

In fact, speaking in physical terms as opposed to moral terms, whether someone had an accident and was severely injured, or decided to end their own life yet managed only to injure themselves, they might want to have a coup de grace administered to them so as to end the suffering.

 

As to the use of that expression in moral terms, it conveys the image of a stumbling culture that is so clumsy, it does the equivalent of shooting itself in the foot by planting a visible contradiction at the end of the discourse – thus shuts itself off in the manner of the coup de grace – each time that it tries to have it both ways.

 

Which culture is that, you ask? It is the artificially concocted so-called Jewish culture. In fact, time after time after time, the mouthpieces who took up the Jewish and/or Israeli causes, put themselves into a bind while trying to squeeze more of a situation than it could yield. In so doing, the mouthpieces blew their cases and delivered nothing to their masters.

 

More recently, the Jews did it to the most important of their causes, thus shot themselves – not with a hand gun this time – but a cannon. It is that they falsely accused Hamas of building a war room under Gaza’s biggest hospital; a war room, they said, that was complete with command and control facilities as well as a warehouse that the freedom fighters filled with sophisticated weapons.

 

When the accusation proved to be a lie, it had the effect of administering a coup de grace, not only to the Jewish causes, but also begged to end the misery that has been causing repeated injuries and suffering among the immoral prostitutes of the American politico-journalistic bordello.

 

This happened because in building a false case against Hamas, the Jews spent years inventing false narratives, and lining up the mouthpieces that would carry them to both the elites of the nation who live off the taxpayers money, as well as to the commoners who create the nation’s wealth by working and paying those taxes. But whereas the commoners rejected the Jewish false narratives, the elites gobbled them hook, line and sinker.

 

Needless to say that all this has had the effect of diminishing America’s credibility and honor in the eyes of a world that could not, and still cannot wrap its head around a superpower that knows what goes on in every nook and cranny around the planet, yet deliberately lent its voice to support the horrific lies that came out the decomposing mouths of a long dead culture. This begs the question: What’s the real story behind that mind boggling history?

 

Could it be that the American elites found themselves so badly ensnared by the Jews they once tried to help—only to find themselves incapable of exiting the quicksand into which the Jews dragged them—they decided to pull the dirtiest trick they have in their “Liberal Democratic” tool box of hypocrisies and slap it on the Jews once and for all?

 

If such is the case, we must assume that America’s elites are now looking forward to the day when the unbecoming responses they have been displaying to appease the demands of Jews, will cause the public patience to boil over and trigger a rebellion that will not be contained.

 

If this happens, it will be a self-administered coup de grace that the taxpaying commoners of America will not regret seeing applied to their country. That’s because they’ll reckon that to suffer big time once is better than suffer in slow motion for an indefinite period of time.

The day the savages received a valuable lesson

 On the day that Clifford D. May was writing a column, which ended up showing him to be utterly confused as to what makes good history and what makes a pile of garbage, his savage brethren were being given a lesson on how to behave in a civilized manner. May’s article came under the title: “Hamas supporters’ ignorance is appalling,” and the subtitle: “Don't know much about Middle Eastern history.” It was published on November 14, 2023. Here is what happened on that day:

 

In keeping with the tradition of trying to reproduce what the non-Jews do, the religious honchos of the Jews called on their American flocks to gather in the Washington Mall, and stage a rally which they hoped will demonstrate to the world the civilized (real or fake) nature of their culture.

 

The difference between what the Jews did, and what humanity had done a day or two previous, is that the non-Jews acted spontaneously and naturally whereas the Jews performed artificially. The result was that humanity’s call to address the ongoing Gaza War, was replicated as poorly as a child would replicate the Mona Lisa.

 

Moreover, the lesson that the Jews learned on that day pertained to the subject of free speech, and the effect it has on those who practice this mode of communication. More specifically, whereas the rallies that developed around the world by non-Jews were disrupted by the enemies of free speech – the savage Jews themselves – the rally that was developed by the Jews in Washington, was left alone by the non-Jews. It proceeded as planned by the organizers, thus demonstrated to these people that you’re not free because you pretend to be free, you’re free because you let others live their freedom the way they see fit.

 

When it comes to telling history, however, the way that Clifford May has tried to do, what goes into judging a piece of work is more complicated. That’ because viewing history and explain it, depend on ideas that were often gathered and absorbed at the same time that the telling historian was undergoing a personal experience that matched the unfolding of the events. Thus, history can become the expression of an opinion more than the description of what happened in real life.

 

Honestly speaking, from the description of Clifford May’s own intellectual journey — from way back then, to the set of beliefs he now brings to the table — I cannot make out what exactly motivates this man. All I can tell is that he accumulated and has stashed in his toolbox, a set of debating skills that look professional on the surface but do him in when closely scrutinized. One of those skills has to do with the point at which a self-described historian begins to tell history.

 

Consider the following example, taken from Clifford May’s article, which I am telling at the risk of causing Fox’s Bret Baier to blow thick smoke at the ears:

 

“Start with this observation by the late Charles Krauthammer: Israel ‘is the only nation on earth that inhabits the same land, bears the same name, speaks the same language, and worships the same God that it did 3,000 years ago.’”

 

I have known about the work of Krauthammer for decades. The first time I saw him was on a PBS program where he sat on a panel with three other journalists, one being African American. Even though I disliked the Jewish attitude of treating the Black Man as if he owned him for no good reason than a Jew once got hurt defending the right of Blacks, I detected a high level of intelligence in Krauthammer and said so. Then, years later, I saw Krauthammer on the Bret Baier news hour as he outshined the other panelists, and wrote something to this effect. This is when Bret Baier went gung ho on the Jew where he remained ever since.

 

Meanwhile, Krauthammer’s telling of history is more rubbish than it is real history. It’s because the self-described historian skipped a huge chunk of the Jewish early history, a time when—as described in their book of history known as “Old Testament”—the Jews were nomadic tribes that lived off the work of those they raided, terrorized, robbed and maybe even fed on the blood of their young like pitiful cannibals.

 

From that point on, Clifford May’s article, especially as it related to the ongoing events of that day, has been nothing more than a downhill free fall. It is a rehash of what the writer has been saying repetitively and monotonously for years. If you haven’t read him before, you may even enjoy his fantasy.

The fishy story that must be made to vanish

 A saying, which I believe originated in Italy and spread to other languages, goes something like this: “The fish rots at the head.” It means to convey the notion that the decomposition of the fish’s entire organic body begins at the brain and spreads from there to all the parts.

 

Meanwhile, the decomposition of an organism is a horrible sight to watch. Despite it however — and in the interest of understanding the perilous times in which we live — you need to imagine the role that a number of decomposing brains are playing in the governance of our human affairs.

 

I could pick any one example of the hundreds that crop up time and time again, and use it to show the pattern that all others follow. So, I choose to discuss the following example:

 

To cover for the fact that they have the religious duty to kill the babies of their foes as they did in ancient Egypt, modern Palestine and the times in-between all over Europe and Asia, the Jews came up with the lie that the Palestinians sacrifice their own babies by using them as a human shield. The Jews add that the Palestinians rejoice when the babies are killed and their photographs shown around the world, which is the propaganda that has served them well in America and around the globe, say the Jews.

 

Adept at starting a lie and spreading it among the politico-journalistic crowd of America, the Jews stuffed the lie in many a mouth that is animated by a decomposing brain. In addition, because in any and every conversation you may have with the Jews, they will not give-and-take normally as do the rest of us—but repeat the complaint that Jews suffered in the past, thus owed money and protection today—you will not get an explanation from them regarding the contradiction that’s inherent to the claim about the Palestinians rejoicing when their children get killed.

 

Blinded by what motivates them and ascribing that motivation to the Palestinians, the Jews fail to see the difference that exists between them killing the children of others, and the others allowing their own children to get killed by Jews. Just think about it and apply simple commonsense. Even if the Palestinians were this heartless, a child to them that grows and becomes a freedom fighter is more valuable to the cause than the propaganda that’s generated by a dead body. If only for this reason, the Palestinians will want the child to live, to grow and take up the struggle baton to achieve freedom for the entire population. Thus, the parents will protect the child with all they got.

 

Beside that unresolved contradiction, the Jews are making the mistake which puts them firmly in the camp of the decomposing brains. It is that the whole world can see they are the ones killing Palestinian babies today in Gaza, using American bombs. The Jews may not say it loudly, but when they accuse the Palestinian parents of letting the Jews do such a horrible act, they shift the blame onto what they must believe are sneaky parents that make the Jews look bad in the eyes of the world by not shielding their children from the murderous hands of the Jews.

 

As always, these cockamamie accusations of Palestinians were generated by the Jews who tried to cover for the activities they undertook previously without thought, but ended up churning the stomachs of ordinary human beings around the Planet. This being the case, you would think that no one sane would want to associate with or support the Jews by repeating what the latter have been saying, let alone finance what they have been doing. But that’s exactly what happened among the brain degenerating zombies of America’s politico-journalistic crowd.

 

It is that the decomposition proved contagious and started to spread among the American body politics, proving once more that the threat of the Jewish culture to the advancement of the human species is real and comparable to the worst that the species has experienced in the past.

 

We need to know this, and need to work diligently on making the Jewish experience the last that the human race will be forced to endure. The Jews must never again be allowed to spread insulting or fishy stories about the Palestinians whom they already injured like no human can ever be treated.

It takes a so-so to believe the dodo

 The bird known as turkey is thought to be a dumb bird. It is therefore used to analogize dumb humans. The now extinct dodo bird which used to live on the Island of Mauritius, was thought to be even dumber. It too is used to analogize dumb humans. Thus, it can be said that if someone believes the human dodo who tells him fantastic stories, that someone’s mental competence can only be rated as a so-so.

 

It happened that during the past three-quarter-century, the dodo operatives populating Jewish Central succeeded in transforming the American politico-journalistic crowd into a swarm of mental so-sos. And nothing is more representative of that crowd than the Congress. It is that every half-baked idea that was put forward by the dodos, was taken to heart and adhered to by the mentally enfeebled legislators. Two of those ideas are discussed here.

 

First, there is the idea of the influence which the donors of money have on the recipients of that money. To come out in an age when election time, looks more like feeding time at the zoo, and claim as do the Jews, that their money has no influence on the receiving politicians, is to play the role of dodo that’s taking advantage of the mentally incapacitated so-sos.

 

Not only do the Jews reject the idea that they donate to political campaigns with the intent to extract concessions that favor Israel, they go beyond it and accuse those who make the suggestion of virulent antisemitism. They explain that they donate because they love what the campaign is advancing, and further explain that the recipient votes the way that he/she does because they love Israel. It is how the dodo and the so-so fall into each other’s embrace.

 

Whereas it is easy for anyone sane to see the glaring link which exists between the Jewish money and the ensuing legislation that favors Israel, the Jews have a difficult time showing the link which they say connects the decisions taken by the administrators, faculty and students of a university with the money that’s donated by a foreign government – not to them personally but to the university.

 

So my friend, what do you think the never-relenting Jews are doing now? I’ll tell you what they are trying to do. They went to the soft underbelly of the American Democracy, which is none other than the Congressional swarm of so-sos, and started to work on those things. The Jews envisage that for valid or invalid reasons, the swarm will eventually destroy the universities of America, at which time Jewish Central will move in and feed on the spoils.

 

So much for the first idea. As to the second, it has to do with a cannibalistic horror that lasted more than half a century; a horror that the Jews inflicted on me, and maintained relentlessly during all that time. Here is what they advanced as excuse, arguing that they had no choice but to do what they did given the reality that I represented an existential threat to them.

 

But when confronted with the reality that I was alone in this world, possessing neither an army nor presiding over an empire, they said: so was Hitler before he managed to build the mighty empire that almost exterminated the Jews in a fiery Holocaust. But why is it important that I tell this true story?

 

It is important because the ideas and doings that go into its execution are not unique to this one case. They represent a game which the Jews play again and again when they have no good argument to advance. That is, they push forward a chain of false links that extend from a saying or an event, however harmless it may be, to the inevitable Holocaust.

 

The event and saying this time, consist of the Palestinians expressing the desire to live freely on their property from the “River to the Sea.” Because freedom for the Palestinians means Holocaust for the Jews, say the latter, it is antisemitic to utter the phrase: From the River to the Sea.

Bestowing grandeur where grandeur is not due

 Eric Severeid once reminded his listeners of the saying that goes something like this: when a small man casts a long shadow, you know that the sun is setting on someone’s radiance.

 

Well then, based on what Clifford D. May is saying, we can now report that because an impoverished population of two million crushed-to-the-ground paupers are casting a long shadow over Western Civilization, you must conclude that the Civilization is declining.

 

Clifford May made his comments in an article that came under the title: “Hamas vs. Western Civilization” and the subtitle: “Gaza is a significant battleground.” The article was published on November 7, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

You got to feel sorry for people of the Clifford May caliber who lack the intellect and/or integrity to tell the truth, or at least a bastardized version of it, and defend what they put out for others to consume. Here is what Clifford May did that sent him this time to the doghouse of feeble mental prowess:

 

“On Oct. 7, Hamas one of Tehran’s several pit bulls, demonstrated what such a policy looks like in practice: mass murder, rape, decapitation of infants. Hamas terrorists proudly recorded their barbarism on GoPro cameras (a Western invention) and posted the images on the internet (a Western invention)”.

 

Consider this now, my friend. Whereas Moses instructed the Jews to adhere to the command: “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth,” the Jews stuck with the old habit of going for ten eyes or more, and going for ten teeth or more. When criticized for doing this, they lied saying that they consider one eye and one tooth as being the limits of how much they can extract from their foes.

 

This has been Israel’s policy in occupied Palestine for decades, and the number of killed and wounded victims on both sides speak for themselves—all the more so because Israel habitually assures it rank-and-file that it is doing well by bragging about the number of Palestinians it has killed in every clash.

 

And while this is the truth which can be verified by everyone, people like Clifford May and thousands more, repeat the lie that terrorism is conducted by the Palestinians and not the Jews. And when speaking in abstract terms, they can no longer sustain the lie, they think up incidents that never happened and attribute them to the Palestinians. That’s how the poisoned Jewish inventions of mass murder, rape and decapitation of infants, slipped into the current debate.

 

Another trick that the Jews pull off to confuse the audience, is that they play what can be termed the single-leg dialogue. That is, instead of letting the two sides of a give-and-take come through their description of how an incident unfolded or an idea developed, they only tell the one side that favors their argument. With that, they falsely let it be understood that the other side is not pushing back because he has no valid argument with which to push.

 

That trick is one that modern Jews inherited from their predecessors. It was used so openly and so shamelessly by them during the decades of the sixties and seventies when they had complete control of the media, you could get sick watching a panel of half a dozen Jews and not a single Arab, tell the audience both the Jewish side of the story, and the Arab side of the story as they saw it. So, you ask: What do we get from the Jews now? Well, this is what we get:

 

“Ghazi Hamad, a senior member of Hamas’ politburo, told a Lebanese television interviewer: ‘We will repeat the October 7 attack, time and again, until Israel is annihilated.’”

 

What’s missing here is the mention and understanding of the principle that when you give the other side a take-it-or-leave it proposition to choose from, you make the choice for yourself and make it for your opponent as well. This is what Israel has been offering the Palestinians for decades. It was to choose from total occupation and the pretense of independence.

 

This being the case, the people of Palestine chose to work on liberating their country rather than give it away while under duress. It is what Ghazi Hamad was echoing during the interview.

 

What he said, in effect, is that in the choice between Palestine or Israel being annihilated, they choose to annihilate Israel.

They want to see the Jews fight to extinction

 There is no idea you can come up with, that will be rejected by one hundred percent of humans. In fact, you’ll find that every idea, spouted by someone influential or by a nobody, no matter how outlandish it may be, will be adopted, adhered to and defended by devotees.

 

Being aware of this reality, you’ll not be surprised to learn that in America, there are renowned journalists and legislators who will look at the genocidal orgy which the Jews, using American weapons of mass destruction, are inflicting on the Palestinian people, and say this is a justified retaliation for what Hamas did to the Jews when they attacked them on October 7. In any case, this was acceptable collateral damage, say the Jews, because the destruction and looting that ensued happened during a war that was fought by highly moral Jewish individuals whose intent was to protect the sanctity of human life.

 

So, you keep the debate going by pointing out that the action of Hamas was itself nothing more and nothing less than retaliation for 56 years of murderous treatment carried out by the Jews on Palestinians, stealing their homeland as they did, and then unleashing cannibalistic settlers that may not have eaten Palestinian flesh, but consumed every property the latter erected for themselves by the sweat of their foreheads; by their blood and tears.

 

Whereas you can see why some Jews will want Israel to continue fighting its neighbors even though no result was given as being the aimed for endgame, you wonder why non-Jewish dudes wish to see Israel continue the fight. Well, while recognizing that no two people think exactly alike, which makes it so that everyone has his own opinion, I did not have to go too far looking for an answer. The following is what happened that brought the answer of one individual to me. Here is what happened:

 

The year was 1977, four years after the 1973 liberation of the Sinai by Egypt’s military. Now confident that Israel will never again dare to attack Egypt as it did in 1967 when it launched a surprise attack and occupied the Sinai – President Anwar Sadat of Egypt decided, might as well replace the truce that governed the relations between Egypt and Israel into a peace treaty. He travelled to Israel and said so to its leaders and its people.

 

I was working at the time in an office that was filled with colleagues from different ethnic groups. One of those was a Pakistani who proved to be a bit more fanatic than I expected him to be. It is that Sadat’s action in the Middle East prompted this man to almost completely sever his relationship with me. He made it clear he was doing it because Egypt had the opportunity to continue fighting the Jews but made peace with them instead.

 

Curious about this phenomenon, and wishing to learn more about it, I set out to conduct a study that might yield some answers, and what I found was disturbing. People of all races that believed the Arabs could annihilate the Jews, wanted the fight to continue to the end. People of all races that believed Israel could humiliate, and forever silence the Arab and Musim Worlds, wanted the fight to continue till the latter fell to their knees and begged for mercy.

 

This tells me that the phenomenon is so ingrained in our human DNA, it is widespread among all kinds of populations, including the politico-journalistic crowd of America. And this explains why in the Land of the First Amendment, a handful of Jews was able to convince the defenders of Free Speech to stop defending it but stab it in the back instead.

 

It all started with the Jewish cancellation of people who refused to succumb to the Jewish threats. It has now infested the American Congress where it is becoming a habit to censure the members who disagree with the policies of a foreign entity.

 

And it was simple to execute. All that a Jewish lobbyists had to do was warn every member of the politico-journalistic crowd in America that should Israel fall, he/she will be held responsible. They will be hunted down the way that the Nazis are today. What will the dodos come up with next?

Crossing the ideological divide does not mean self-loathing

The trick known as Catch-22 is now understood to mean the formulation of a gimmick that aims to paralyze what someone is trying to accomplish. The way this is done, is to argue that you cannot proceed with Step A because B forbids it, and you cannot proceed with Step B because A forbids it. That makes the situation that’s at hand a mutually exclusive proposition.

 

When you spend time to study what the Jewish leaders do to their people and the societies they invade, you’ll find them give highest priority to the continuous creation of Catch-22 paralyzing bugs which they inject into the cultures that sustain them.

 

Every cycle that begins with the Jews running away from a society whose people discovered what they are up to — and made clear to them that Jews are no longer welcome here—started with them settling down quietly at first, but then quickly moving to work on bugging the society they just invaded. They do it to paralyze the society thus make it serve their agenda for as long as possible. But however long that service may have lasted, the welcoming societies got fed up with the Jews again and again, and told them off in no uncertain terms.

 

Despite the fact that Jewish history is replete with that kind of scenarios playing themselves out time after time as the Jews moved on from place to place, the rank-and-file remained unable to shake off the Catch-22 bugs that their leaders injected into them precisely to prevent them from moving on to serve “other gods.” This is what prompted an aging Jewish lawyer I became acquainted with — who used to live in Europe during the years when the Holocaust was being implemented — to angrily warn that the Holocaust will happen again, but with a difference this time.

 

Familiar with the geography which the Jews traced from where they departed to where they were slaughtered, the aging lawyer could see a steady westward movement that could no longer be sustained. He explained that such is the hard reality because Planet Earth is a sphere where the beginning and the end meet, rather than a never ending flat piece of real estate that goes on forever. The bitter point he was making was that the Jews have gone as far West as they can, from Asia to California. A further push westward will take them back to Asia where it all started. Thus, his dire warning to the effect that an American displeasure with Jewish trickery will lead to a swift holocaust that will be truly final this time.

 

So, the question that begs for an answer has come down to this: What’s wrong with the Jews that we should become aware of, and try to help them resolve?

 

What’s wrong with the Jews is the Catch-22 trick that’s injected into them with their mothers’ milk, and is constantly refreshed by their leaders as time moves on. The trick maintains them in a permanent state of paralysis, even when we treat them as harshly as the stubborn mule that budges only when hit with a two-by-four. It is that the Jews fail to get the hint where the mule does.

 

In fact, the trick consists of indoctrinating the Jewish children with the notion that they belong to two mutually exclusive human entities. One is that they belong to an ethnic group (whatever it is, Hebrew or otherwise) which makes of them an integral part of the human race. The other notion is that they belong to a religious entity which sets them apart from the human race, and places them—not alongside it but above it.

 

This leads to the deviously concocted belief that when an individual Jew decides to ditch the restricting religion and become member of the human race to live like everyone else, he is reprimanded by his peers who let him know that he demeaned all Jews by taking the step that paints him as a self-loathing Jew, therefore one who loathes all Jews.

 

In reverse, the non-Jews who are intrigued by Judaism and convert to it to become a part of the group that fascinated them no end for a time—well, these people are told they are not considered Jews because they have the wrong lineage.

 

What all this boils down to is that if you’re a Jew, you’re cursed when you leave the religion. But if you’re not a Jew and try to become one, you’re not welcome as a full member of the tribe. It is the case of A blocking B while B is blocking A … the full flowering of the Catch-22 syndrome.

 

What we can do therefore as human beings that want to help the Jews, is assure those who want to leave their demonic religion that doing so does not make them self-loathing. It makes them smart.

It’s mass shooting at home, mass bombing abroad

 Translated in a manner that better suits a North American audience, an Egyptian saying that’s used derisively when the circumstances warrants it, goes as follows: “This carpenter lives behind a broken door.” The intent here should be obvious to everyone: The saying points out the inherent hypocrisy in someone preaching a virtue they don’t have so as to make it look like they are endowed with it.

 

Things become even murkier when the scenario changes from that of the carpenter giving a take-it-or-leave-it advice, to that of using the sort of coercion which leaves no room for the client to say no and walk away from what he determines is a bad deal.

 

Whereas you may not find a real-life situation that runs as shown here, you’ll discover situations that come so close, they’ll shake you just as much. In fact, America is a prime example that stands as a case study. Plagued with mass shootings at home that run at the frequency of at least two a day, America still runs around the world proclaiming that it has the best system of governance because it values human life more than anyone else, and this gives it the right to impose its system—erroneously called democracy—on others, and do so by force of arms where necessary.

 

The use of Israel in the Middle East and Taiwan in the Far East, shows a situation in which America lost control over its Israeli proxy, and another situation in which it shows no confidence that when the time comes, it will control its Taiwan proxy any better than it does Israel.

 

But how did the government of Israel, backed by Jewish Central, as it always is, manage to work things in such a way as to suck out of America more than it needed in financial and military aid? Even more stunning is the situation that developed when the time came to show respect for America’s guidance as to what Israel can and cannot do with that aid while using it to inflict destruction on someone else. What happened in reality was that America got nothing less than Israel’s middle finger telling it to buzz off.

 

All of that was made possible to benefit Israel, and may be repeated again and again in the future because there is no sign that America will change or that it can change if it wanted to. It is that the system of Liberal Democracy which served the Western nations well during two or three centuries, has been infiltrated by the Jews who mangled it badly to benefit their causes even at the expense of those that help Israel for legitimate and illegitimate reasons.

 

Because Taiwan does not control a Jewish Central kind of syndicate, it will not attempt to duplicate what the Jews did for Israel. But Taiwan has a financial clout it can use to make America respond favorably to its demands. That clout comes in the form of a highly advanced collection of chips that have become indispensable for running a modern economy. Those chips are devices that Taiwan produces in abundance at a time when no one else has even setup as yet to begin catching up with Taiwan.

 

What does all this say about the possible fate of America as we move on into an era where hypocrisy will be quickly detected by the public and rejected vehemently the way that the commoners of the entire Planet demonstrated to show their anger at the genocidal orgy that Israel has unleashed on the people of Palestine using American weapons of mass destruction.

 

Because those weapons could not have been made without the use of chips made in Taiwan, will Taiwan wake up to the idea that it has the means to make the world love and respect it by slapping a chips embargo on America, thus force it to end the Jewish orgy whose intensity has already sicked all of the human race?

I do not like saying it, but I told them so

 Time after time, occasion after occasion, I told the Jews – as I did decade in and decade out – on the pages of this blog and elsewhere, that what they do to the world today, will be done to them, to America or to both simultaneously tomorrow.

 

And time after time, talking to these people, even to do as little as warn them of the danger they are forgetfully inviting to befall them, befall their families and their so-called friends, was like whistling Dixie watching a just painted wall as it refuses to dry up or release you from your trance.

 

I lived on campus for a while during my college years, and these were the years during which I spent a great deal of time going to the library to read up on the subjects related to the courses I was studying, and read up on any and every subject that might have intrigued me in the interim.

 

I saw something then, but being naïve at the time, said something, not to the right people, but said it to the wrong ones. What I saw was the desecration of books, done by hands that could not be anyone’s but those who today continue to mess up what they touch with their blighted hands.

 

These were the Jews to whom I complained that some users, most certainly people of their kind, were “correcting” by hand with a blue pen, the content they did not like to see in books that seemed to deprive the Jews of the supremacy they crave, talking about them instead as if they were comparable to the rest of the human race.

 

As time passed, I saw more of that kind of behavior, and saw more of the fanaticism that motivated the Jews to do what they do both consciously and forgetfully – and was horrified. I began to realize that something in the human family was not compatible with the rest of us, but could not make out if the Jews were a stink bomb or a doomsday bomb that can explode at any time.

 

While still working for a living and living at home, I had already received an envoy sent to me by the Canadian Jewish Congress, warning that I must never again contact the media, or the Jews will ruin my life. That’s the encounter which later added to the decision at becoming selective in my reading habits. In fact, from then on, I used to go to the library to search for and read the books and articles that would tell me all that I needed to know about the Jews.

 

During moments of intense reflection, I fell back on my Egyptian culture as modified by my French education, and came to the conclusion that what the Jews were doing to the world today will be done to them tomorrow. I said so to the Jews in as friendly a manner as I could, but they ignored me, thus left the supposed drywall as wet as it ever was … But I’m not waiting for it to dry.

 

The tomorrow I talked about then to the Jews and to all my readers, has come. It is now called today. And what we see today is that the prediction I made long ago, has been realized. In fact, the Jews who did not want anyone being exposed to ideas that do not glorify them while trashing Israel’s foes, now see their message ripped and discarded as if written on a toilet paper.

 

A similar kind of scenario played itself out when leaders of the American Jews, whose empty skulls were filled with false statistics about their popularity, felt super-confident that America had finally been turned into the toy they can play with and use as a weapon with which to bring the American public and the world, in line with the undercurrents and above currents meant to serve them immediately and serve Israel in the long run.

 

They set-up watch groups to monitor what was happening in America, especially on the college campuses, but also in the classrooms where they harassed the professors that did not praise them and praise Israel enough, or that did not trash their opponents. And they ran to the Jewish owned and Jewish inspired media to complain that they were made to suffer antisemitism by the fact that they were treated as equal to others instead of recognizing that no equivalence can be drawn between Jews who are a breed apart, and anyone who may only be a commoner adhering to an inferior religion.

 

Well, my friend, look what the world, including the American public, are telling the Jews now, amid the President and Prime Minister of Israel asserting publicly that all Gazans deserve to be slaughtered (which Israel is doing) because they voted for Hamas.

 

And the world has replied: You may be a breed apart but you’re not towering above our heads. Instead you proved to be droppings, sitting on the ground under our dogs’ bums where you whine about your fate and serve as fertilizer.

Justifying the inscrutable doing the unthinkable

Because it is more clarifying to discuss the following set of ideas by incorporating them into a fictitious story, here is the one that will do the job. Imagine an encounter between an American leader (US) and a Jewish leader (JEW). They are having an off-the-record conversation:

 

JEW: Have you ever seen a Palestinian kibbutz?

 

US: No, I never did. That’s because as far as I know, only Jews build kibbutz. But I always wondered why they build these things?

 

JEW: I’ll tell you why. If you’ve been following the news relating to the currently raging war between Hamas and the Israel Terror Force (ITF,) you’ll know that we’ve achieved great success getting you Americans to take the blame for the Holocaust we’re in the process of inflicting on the Palestinians.

 

US: I don’t understand. Where is the link between building kibbutz and inflicting genocide on the Palestinian people?

 

JEW: The link is a deviously conceived, tortuous set of steps that rely on the weaknesses we’ve been injecting into your culture over the past half century. We did so to make you believe that when you hear us say “Hamas terrorists,” you think that the money and weapons you give us free of charge, are used by the Hamas freedom fighters — not to defend themselves — but to wipe Israel off the map whose span extends from the River to the Sea. And so, we engage in the practice that Hitler dreamed of but could never achieve. It is to get the American dodos to help us justify the inscrutable by doing the unthinkable.

 

US: I still don’t get it. Where is the link that connects the act of building kibbutz only meters away from the demarcation line that separates Gaza from occupied Palestine — and inflicting genocide on the indigenous people of that land?

 

JEW: I don’t blame you. So, think of a 4-step process. Step 1, we provoke Hamas into defending themselves. They do so while respecting the strictest laws of warfare. Step 2, we accuse them of terrorism, and con your highest honchos into going public with the lies we stuff into their mouths. They regurgitate the false accusations without acknowledging that the kibbutz adults were hiding behind the children as they have been doing sine the 1940s. In any case, nobody who is not of the American politico-journalistic crowd, believes the regurgitating zombie-like mouthpieces. Step 3, the politico-journalistic crowd spews out a sea of lies and swims in it like fish swims in muddied water. Step 4, the zombies steal the money which belongs to the American people and give it to the Jews who use it to kill the Palestinian people. Do you, brainless American honcho, now understand how the Kibbutz is used to justify the holocaust to exterminate the Palestinian people we’re in the process of implementing at this time?

 

US: Do you know what you just did, my Jewish interlocutor — which I am sure you did, not knowing the consequences that would result from your explanation? You just helped me jump intellectually — in a single step — as much as millions of years of evolution. From the level of “monkey see, monkey do” and the level of “monkey hear, monkey repeat,” where I was stuck, I now appreciate the human method of bringing together the pieces that belong to the same story, and repainting and projecting the full canvas of what happened. It is like rising 30,000 feet up in the air to look at and judge the entire landscape rather than pass judgement on a mile-wide case based on what I see in the one inch scrap with which you’ve been constantly feed me during the decades.

 

JEW: Once again I, the depraved Jewish liar have managed to shoot myself in the foot as I was trying to have it both ways.