After half a century of Jewish
monopoly on power in America
– especially when it comes to foreign policy – the American people have finally
learned what the rest of the world has known for centuries. It is that the Jews
are the most damaging fakes you can listen to because they feel no shame giving
advice on everything when, in reality, they are a bunch of zeros in every
domain, especially those relating to the real world that's out there.
No one knew until now why the
Jewish mistakes turned out to be so big, why these people made so many of them,
and why they kept making mistakes for such a long time. What was known about
the Jews was that they did what everyone else did, which is to connect the
dots. Thus, for a while, the theory had been that the Jews were connecting the
wrong dots, or connecting the right dots the wrong way. Now, however, it has
become evident that neither of these were the case. They were not because
something else had been at work.
This becomes apparent in the
article that Michael Ledeen wrote under the title: “Iran 's Greatest Vulnerability” and
the subtitle: “The Iranian people hate the regime.” It was published on May 7,
2015 in the Weekly Standard. What comes out the article is that the Jews did
not work with real dots. Instead, they imagined at every turn, the dots that
suited the delusion of the moment, connected them with an imaginary line, and
came up with plans of action that may have worked in a parallel universe but
not in this universe.
Still, we are here, and there is
among us a Michael Ledeen showing us how the Jewish mistakes were made, and why
they were instrumental at taking America from the status of
superpower to that of super-joke in no time at all. At work has been a fantasy
that the Jews articulated every time they saw the edifice they were erecting
come close to crashing down. In the same way that they exploded a cluster of
false reports about Egypt going bankrupt at the very moment that the country
was pulling itself from the temporary difficulties it had experienced, Ledeen
is now exploding a similar cluster about Iran because the country is about to
flourish to its full potential.
Here is how the author is
communicating his fantasy: “Of all the worries that torment the Supreme Leader
Khamenei and President Rouhani, the greatest is the menace represented by the
Iranian people, who detest the regime.” But why say that at this time when, in
fact, he has no idea what these people think or how they feel? He said it
because the world saw the Iranian people dance in the streets upon learning
that their leaders have reached an agreement with the West to end the sanctions
imposed on their country.
Thus, Ledeen has deemed it
important to tell the world that what it saw was not real. He then offered his
fantasy as a substitute vision to hold on to. Of course, he did not expect
anyone sane to believe this, but that was acceptable to him because his real
aim had only been to convince the retarded American legislators of the soundness
of his vision. These would be the Congresspeople who roam the District of Columbia with lava that
overflows their ventricular cavities, spines that are made of jelly, and a
moral clarity that is made of toxic waste.
He now connects that imagined dot
to the next, which is this: “Khamenei's nephew made the point that there are
forces in the Iranian opposition that can organize and assist the civil
disobedience of the Iranian people.” He goes on to connect it to the dot that
follows: “The country is a shambles [where] the fear of popular anger is
catalyzed by regime incompetence and corruption.”
But from where did he get these
notions? He got them from the hearsay of a hearsay, both of which are
self-serving. Here is how they came to be: “There's little hope that Iranian
agriculture will improve, as the country is in the grip of a water shortage,
made worse by the regime building dams all over the place … according to an
Australian report that cites an Iranian document.”
As if this were not enough, things
are happening in Iran
that happen everywhere else in the world, says Michael Ledeen: teachers have
gone on strike. But what's wrong with that? He responds, we must “conclude that
Iran
is in what we used to call a 'prerevolutionary situation.'” How does he make
that out? Simple, he says: “Khamenei and Rouhani certainly agree.” The only
trouble is that “Obama doesn't want to hear that this would-be partner is going
wobbly.” But Ledeen assures us: “wobbly it is.”