Finally, a former big wig from inside the bowels of horror
has decided to come out the hole of Jewish depravity and enjoy life in the open
where there is light and civilized interactions among all men and all women.
His name is Henry Siegman who used to preside over the American Jewish
Congress, but does more useful things now.
He wrote: “Give Up on Netanyahu, Go to the United Nations,”
an article that was published on May 20, 2015 in the New York Times. As you
read the article, you feel it in your bones that the man understands the
message which humanity has been sending to these people, a message that says:
Final-solution the ideology of sheer horror you adhere to, or humanity will try
and try again to final-solution your followers, both the guilty among them and
the innocent ones who did nothing to deserve such fate.
To make certain that what he is about to say will not be
lost on the American people or the captains of the ship of state, Siegman
begins the article with this: “Continued peace talks with the Palestinians
serves no purpose other than to provide cover for Israel's expansion of Jewish
settlements and to preclude the emergence of anything resembling a Palestinian
state.” And he ends by warning that if the lesson is not well understood
“America will be seen as collaborating with Mr. Netanyahu's government in the
continued subjugation of the Palestinians. That would irreparably damage the
United States' honor and its national interests.”
As to the lesson he is giving to America, he begins it by
saying, in his own way, that there are no moderates in Israel. In fact, speaking
of what is perceived as the more moderate faction in Israel, he says the
following about it: “An agreement based on the 1967 lines never appeared in the
Zionist Union's platform or crossed Mr. Herzog's lips.” It cannot be said
clearer or more concisely than that.
As to the most extreme faction, he says the following about
it: “Mr. Netanyahu is providing offense [to American democratic sensibilities]
by appointing as justice minister Ayelet Shaked who posted an article on her
Facebook page that called for the destruction of 'the entire Palestinian
people, including its elderly and its women, its cities and its villages, its
property and its infrastructure.'” No, this is not Ahmadinejad talking about
the Jews; it is Israel's minister of justice talking about the Palestinians.
And the US Congress of fools never condemned it.
This being the reality of what has been going on in the Middle
East … a reality that was kept hidden from the American people during the past
half century, Siegman views Israel's recent victory of the far right as
providing an opening for Mr. Obama to call for a reassessment of America's
peace policy. And because “it is certain that a two-state agreement will never
emerge from negotiations,” he advises that “such agreement can only be achieved
if the United Nations Security Council, with strong support from the United
States, presents the parties with clear terms.”
If this is rejected by any of the parties or by both, says
Siegman, “America would then join other countries in asking the Security
Council to resolve the outstanding final-status issues.” He predicts that
Israel will reject the idea of ending the occupation and the establishment of a
Palestinian state. Thus, he goes on to say: “such decision would encourage
international boycotts of Israel and challenges to its legitimacy.” He opines
that America's unconditional support for Israel will erode -- a circumstance
that will be far more likely to change Israel's policies than any of the
present strategies.
Despite the fact that he sees “fierce domestic opposition
from the Israel lobby and many members of Congress” if the Obama administration
were to shift its Middle Eastern policy, Siegman urges Mr. Obama to move
decisively in the direction he outlined. Yes, he used the word decisively,
because he knows what happens when you dilly dally with these people; they keep
diluting what you're proposing till it loses its significance.
To make sure that Israel gets the message, he warns its
leaders that America's commitment to Israel's security will be in danger of
eroding if the administration continues to prevent the UN from pursuing a
two-state agreement while continuing to provide Israel with the military
assistance that helps it maintain the occupation.