Here is another article to show why you cannot trust
anything that is authored by a Jew on the Middle East .
Written by Trudy Rubin under the title: “Egypt's Sisi is fueling discontent,”
it was published on May 23, 2015 in the Philadelphia Enquirer.
The article tells the story of an Egyptian professor named
Shahin who is apparently well known in America. The truth is that I never heard
of him in Canada, and have no idea as to the particulars of the case that's
discussed in Rubin's article. And so, I am not here weighing the validity of
that case; I'm only looking at the style employed by Jews, such as herself,
when they tackle Middle Eastern subjects. I see them use prepackaged potions
that void their own arguments.
Our author wrote nearly 900 words to reach conclusions that
have nothing to do with the case she pretends to discuss, and everything to do
with an Egyptian Revolution that will require dozens of volumes to be explained,
and decades of history-writing before it can be fully understood. So you want
to know from where she gathered the information to do all that she did.
Believe it or not, she set out to encapsulate in 900 words
the entire history of the Egyptian Revolution, based only on the following
tidbits: “According to U.S. academics who know Shahin well ... [such as] Nathan
Brown, a well-known expert on Egypt at George Washington University. I agree.”
To be fair to her, it must be said that there is something else.
It is that the story has two other connections with America
– a fact that may have helped Rubin understand in an instant a situation that
would have required an army of historians, and several lifetimes to stitch
together. The first connection has to do with another Egyptian American who was
sentenced to life in prison in Egypt and yet, no American diplomat ever
succeeded to have him deported to America despite the “annual U.S. aid to
Egypt”.
As to the other connection, it involves the American
President Barack Obama. Well, at this point, you may have guessed that because
a Jew is writing about Obama, only one thing would have been said … and you
would be correct. It is that the man acts the way he does because he is
motivated by an obsession with a legacy that dictates all of his actions, she
points out.
In fact, because Obama is pursuing a nuclear accord with
Shiite Iran, Rubin sees him appeasing the Sunni Arab states – such as Egypt –
by not responding to the severity of the sentences handed down by judges in
that country. But, like all Jews, she hastens to inject her little advice. It
is that “Egypt's war on dissent is bound to boomerang. President Obama should
be making this point forcefully to Sisi.” You don't just make your point when
talking to an Arab; you make your point 'forcefully'.
A few more points – actually, potions that act like poison
pills – strewn throughout the article, tell that it is vintage Jewish, and must
therefore be void of any useful meaning. There is this point: “an Egyptian who
could help his country.” Do you see what is meant by that? It is meant that
Egypt is sitting helpless when it has one of its own that can help it, and yet
Egypt is mistreating him.
And because it is impossible to have an article about the
system of justice in Egypt – written by a Jew – that does not include the
obligatory sentences and phrases, you find two of them in this article. The
first is this: “The charges are ludicrous;” the second is this: “Another sham
trial”. It seems they never have clean trials in Egypt.
There is also the never missed subtle suggestion that when a
number is mentioned by the government of Egypt, the Jewish writers will say
they met someone who told them the real figure is double that. You often see it
happen with the unemployment rate. If the government says 10 percent, someone
tells the Jew, it is 20 percent.
This time, the principle was applied to the number of people
arrested in Egypt last year. The government said 22,000 people, and the Jew
wrote: “Egyptian human rights groups claim the number is double that”.