Let's
be honest with ourselves and admit that as human beings, we love some of the
things that surround us; we only like some other things, and we hate those that
annoy us as we try to carry on with life.
Because
we are endowed with intelligence, we are capable of perceiving in our minds'
eyes, a spectrum against which we measure the degree to which we love, like or
hate something or someone. Because our species has had some ten thousand years
of civilization, we have assigned limits to loving, to liking, to hating — limits we deem “acceptable” or “understandable” for every
circumstance we may encounter in life. And so, when someone goes past those
limits; they indicate that something has gone wrong with their value judgment.
It could also indicate that they need professional help.
Now
my friend, read David French's latest column which came under the title: “Dear
Progressives, Do not Whitewash Marc Lamont Hill's Anti-Semitism,” published on
November 30, 2018 in National Review Online — and
decide where on the spectrum you would place this work.
To avoid complicating the study, leave out
the part of the discussion which pertains to the issues raised by the speech
that Marc Lamont gave at the United Nations. Concentrate instead, on the
degrees of loving, liking or hating that are insinuated by each of David
French's assertions, and judge for yourself if this man sits within the bounds
of what's acceptable, or if he needs professional help. Here is what he says in
essence:
“Hate is hate. The UN is notoriously
anti-Semitic. Free Palestine from the river to the sea means the physical
destruction of the Jewish state. The white supremacist mantra: ‘We must secure
the existence of our people and a future for white children’ — is racist. The
desire for a one-state solution that is not Israel, means the destruction of
the Jewish state. Hamas's missiles are aimed at Israel's towns and cities.
There's not even a hint of an effort to confine their targeting to Israel's
military alone. On campus, I've been shocked at the double standards applied to
Israel, and as Hamas rockets rain down on Israel, the anti-Semitism
metastasizes. Israel has a right to exist. Eliminationists [pro-Palestinians or
pro-Jewish] should be treated as we treat all bigots, entitled to their First
Amendment rights, but not to our respect”.
Look closely at what David French is
saying: For him to assert that the UN is anti-Semitic is to assert that
humanity is anti-Semitic. If this is true, then there is something wrong with
the Jews and not with humanity.
Likewise, for David French to assert that
a free Palestine from the river to the sea means the destruction of the Jewish
state, is also to assert that a free Jewish state from the river to the sea,
means the destruction of the Palestinian state. And this, in fact, is the
current situation, what the Jews wish to maintain forever. This is why the
world is telling the Jews to accept a two-state solution, or the table will be
turned on them.
In the same way that the Kurds, the Yazidis,
the authentic Jews, the Druze, the natives of the New world, and even the fake
Jews, wish to secure an independent future for their offspring, so do the white
people. And there is nothing scary about them expressing this sentiment.
David French says that Hamas is not trying
to confine targeting its missiles at military sites inside Israel. He is not
telling the truth. Do you know what is true, my friend? Whenever Hamas or
Hezbollah procure a supply of accurate targeting mechanisms to add to their
missiles (so as not to see the missiles go astray when trying to hit military
targets) it is Israel that bombs the convoys which bring those supplies to
Hamas and Hezbollah.
David French goes on to say that Israel
has the right to exist. What he is not allowing to get through his thick skull,
is that Palestine has the right to come back into existence the way it was
since the beginning of time.
And so, he counsels others to treat the
pro-Palestinian eliminationists as bigots even though the Palestinians
eliminated no one. But what his crusade is highlighting — without him realizing
it — is the need to restrain the pro-Jewish eliminationists, who are
maintaining Palestine in its current state of being “eliminated”.
But
why is David French's logic so badly mutilated? The reality is that he is not
alone in this predicament. The phenomenon began to appear in America when the
Jewish “indoctrinate and exploit” machine started to recruit veterans that
fought in Arab countries.
Left
in the hands of psychiatrists, these soldiers are brainwashed into believing
that the horror they saw on the battlefield was not normal. They are made to
believe that horror at this level happens only in Arab wars because the Arabs are
very bad people. And this is why the veterans must worship Israel to
unprecedented levels of fanaticism — to show
appreciation for the little country that is protecting America.
And
this is how the Jews collect the spoils of war even when America loses a war. The
difference is that instead of collecting what used to belong to the enemy, the
Jews now collect by exploiting the syndrome of mutilated mentalities plaguing
the returning veterans.