At the ripe old age of 81, three years before he died, Benjamin
Franklin, having participated in the deliberations pertaining to the
Constitutional Convention, was asked by some delegates what exactly did they
just create. He replied it was: A Republic if you can keep it.
The man was asked a short question, and he gave a short answer.
But the history behind all of that, involved not only what happened before
those words were spoken, but what happened long after them as well. It was the
struggle, the sacrifices and the wars that the American colonies had to endure
to gain full independence from Britain. And while all of this was unfolding — as
most historians would agree — France played a major role in helping the
American patriots win the struggle, achieve independence, and create the
Republic they sought.
But here is the bad news: While the Americans have managed their
Republic reasonably well, and kept it in a manner that would have pleased
Benjamin Franklin for more than two centuries, they began the process of losing
it after that. Now federated into a single country, the Republic is gradually
turning into a massive Jewish colony. There are obvious signs this is
happening, and there are clear answers how the trend can be reversed. But what
is in doubt, is that the will exists in America to embark on such a project.
One of the obstacles standing in the way of the American public
mounting a concerted effort to prevent their Republic from turning into a
plantation in the service of Jewish causes, is the concerted effort that the
Jewish leaders and their brainwashed Christian cohorts have mounted to defeat
the spirit of independence that used to fire-up the imagination of Benjamin
Franklin's generation.
One of those cohorts is David French whose specialty is to produce
and purvey subtle deceptions. This time, he put himself in charge of
interpreting current events in a manner that tells a story contrary to what's
happening in reality. You can see this when studying the article that he wrote
under the title: “Don't ignore the warnings in Gen. Mattis' resignation
letter,” published on December 21, 2018 in the New York Post.
The task at hand being to force President Trump to reverse the
Syria decision he took in order to end America's habit of hemorrhaging blood
and wealth for the sake of others, David French volunteered to lead the charge
against Donald Trump. His worry being that when America stops hemorrhaging,
Israel begins weakening, he decided to turn up a sleight of hand that will make
sure America stays in the business of hemorrhaging blood and treasure, thus
strengthen Israel and weaken its neighbors.
The idea is to give the Jews a chance to establish the empire they
have been dreaming about since the days of Moses. They want America to pave the
way for them to walk all over a neighborhood that's weakened by American
aggressive military, diplomatic and economic moves. To achieve all this, David
French interpreted General Mattis' resignation letter in a way that gives the
impression the General wanted to see the implementation of the Jewish scheme;
when in fact, the General was opposed to the scheme they concocted for
Palestine.
Here is the passage in the Mattis letter that David French is
emphasizing: One core belief I have always held is that our strength as a
nation is inextricably linked to the strength of our unique and comprehensive
system of alliances and partnerships … We cannot protect our interests without
maintaining strong alliances and showing respect to those allies.
Given the history of David French's fanatic support for Israel,
what he did in quoting those words, is give the false impression that General
Mattis regards Israel as useful when it comes to protecting America's
interests. But you'll find that the reality on the ground is the opposite of
that. You’ll find it when you study what the General thought of America's
relationship with Israel. In fact, in addition to opposing the ditching of the
Iran deal, Mattis opposed moving the embassy to Jerusalem. And he spoke
extensively about the occupation of Palestine. Here is some of what he said in
that regard:
“I paid a military security price every day as the commander of
Central Command because the Americans were seen as biased in support of Israel,
and because the moderate Arabs who want to be with us can't support the people
who don't show respect for the Palestinians ... If I'm in Jerusalem and I put
500 Jewish settlers to the east and there's 10,000 Arabs here, if I draw the
border to include them, either it ceases to be a Jewish state or you say the
Arabs don't get to vote. This is apartheid. It didn't work the last time I saw
it practiced in a country”.
America is paying a military security price being too friendly
with Israel, is what the General has said. He could not be more emphatic
repudiating that relationship. It’s because when you sacrifice your security to
the one that’s already bleeding you financially and in term of standing in the
world, you become a colony of that someone. And the General would have none of
that.