For
the first time, Clifford D. May has deployed a trick that was taken out the
tool box in which the mob of Jewish pundits usually hides the gimmicks by which
to impress upon the captains of the American ship of state that when the
magnetic needle points North, it means South and vice versa.
It
is a tricky thing to explain how this logic operates when using the
straightforward approach. I shall therefore do the analysis in a somewhat
unusual manner. I'll begin the discussion by referring to the last paragraph in
the column that came under the title: “Punishing the Saudi prince,” written by
Clifford D. May, and published on December 11, 2018 in The Washington Times.
Here is the essence of that paragraph:
“In
these instances, the international community responded fecklessly. It would not
be surprising, therefore, that the 33-year-old crown prince had expected the
killing of Mr. Khashoggi to be treated with similar indifference”.
This
prompts the question: When do members of the mob of Jewish pundits get
surprised by the activities of some people — the Arab
country of Saudi Arabia, for example — and when do they not get surprised by
the activities of some people — the Arab country of Saudi Arabia, for example?
If
I confused you, my friend, here is the explanation that should clarify the
thing for you: There was a time when Saudi Arabia led an Arab movement to
ostracize Egypt because the latter had signed a peace treaty with Israel. The
Jews hit back by unleashing a propaganda campaign against the “House of Saud,”
using as excuse an incident they said was so surprising, the American Congress
of the brain dead should be stupefied. And the Jews went on to explain what the
incident entailed. It was that an American woman visiting Saudi Arabia was told
to cover her head when appearing in public. Oh, my God! What an ugly surprise
that was!
Bear
in mind this happened right after the Americans had used Saudi bases to push
Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait. That was the same Saddam Hussein who lobbed Scud
missiles at Israel during that same war. But surprise, surprise, the Jews
proved fearful of America forging a relationship with Saudi Arabia that was
closer than the one it had with Israel. And so, the Jewish mob in America,
attacked Saudi Arabia more ferociously than ever before when it was supposed to
thank the Saudis for helping to curtail Saddam's military prowess.
But
the defeat of Saddam — who was Iran's archenemy at a
time when Iran was Israel's sweetheart — gave Iran the opportunity to
shine like a bright start in the region ... so much so that the promise of the
Star of David establishing itself as the hegemonic regime in the Middle East,
began to fade by comparison. And that's when the mob of Jewish pundits began to
see their former sweetheart turn into their enemy of the day. And so, the Jews
began to attack Iran while praising Saudi Arabia. They did it because, in their
mind, they saw an opportunity to exploit them both, given that Iran is Shia
Muslim whereas Saudi Arabia is Sunni Muslim, and a low-level animosity has
lingered between the two for centuries.
By
now, the whole thing must look so Byzantine to you, the probability is that you
will not try to sort out where you should be surprised and where you should
not. Good for you. What you should do instead is go over the Clifford May
article from the start, and see what other techniques the Jews are using to
impress America's leaders with their power of persuasion, thus get them to
commit American resources to look after Israel.
Here
is one instance: “Consult a map of the Middle East. Locate the Strait of
Hormuz.” And here is another instance: “Look at the map again. Locate the
Bab-el-Mandeb, another strategic strait.” What is significant about this approach
is that the Jews learned that haggling people
verbally was not enough to move them. They learned that to move people, they
should back what they say with documents. And so, the Jews started to document
the claims they made, except for one crucial thing. Whereas America's leaders
were persuaded in most part by the Jewish documentation, the rest of the world
was not.
In
fact, the world scoffed at Israel's Netanyahu twice when he tried to document
what he was saying. The first was when Netanyahu used a drawing to explain that
Iran was close to detonating a nuclear bomb. The second was when he tried to
convince the world that the Israelis had stolen Iranian documents relating to
nuclear research. Obviously, Netanyahu had not realized that documentation
meant something more serious than that.
But
why was Netanyahu fooled into believing he could pull such a low caliber con
job on the world? He thought he could because he did it to the Americans time after
time, and the Americans bought the garbage he was selling.
In
fact, every time that the Israelis needed American material and/or moral
support for committing a criminal act against a neighbor, they got the green
light from the Americans by showing them maps and drawings as useless as used
toilet paper.
What's
important to note is that whereas the Americans were impressed, Russia's Putin
felt so insulted by one such presentation, he booted Netanyahu out of his
office.