Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Through the Lens of vanishing Paradigms

Dimitri K. Simes has written an interesting article about a new world order that's in the making, except for one thing ... in fact, except for several related things. They are that Simes has done his analysis looking through the lens of existing paradigms. He is not allowing for the possibility that most of these paradigms will shift or vanish altogether as time passes.

Not only is it obvious that those paradigms are on their way out, but the intent of world leaders shaping the future that Simes is talking about is to turn those paradigms on their heads. Thus, it makes little sense to speak of someone changing the status quo, yet speak of the effects of that status remaining static. That's what will strike you when you go over the article which came under the title: “Dangerous Liaisons,” written by Dimitri Simes and published on December 16, 2018 in The National Interest.

Dimitri Simes begins the discussion by criticizing what he calls “Washington's conventional wisdom,” and more specifically, Defense Secretary James Mattis, for not taking seriously the possibility of China and Russia coming together to form an alliance that will militate against the United States. This is something that's already in the works, says Simes, giving a detailed account of the pros and cons of what he sees as an alliance that's growing stronger and more menacing. He then concludes that, “Ignoring possible Sino-Russian cooperation against the United States, and the factors that can exacerbates it, could be very costly”.

What is missing here? Well, the writer might have developed a different point of view, and might have written a different article had he addressed what the late George H. W. Bush (41) called “the vision thing.” No; that would not be Bush's vision of a thousand points of light, but the vision of the leaders who reside in Moscow and Beijing. In fact, it would also be the vision of most leaders in the 200 or so jurisdictions that form the human family.

To understand what that means, it will help to paraphrase an old saying ... this one: it was easier to take the world out of the Cold War, than it is to take the Cold War out of those who experienced it firsthand. These people still think in terms of: “They see a partnership directed against the West and the United States. Should such an alignment come to pass, the dynamics of global geopolitics and economics would change to America's and the West's disadvantage.” How archaic!

This is not the direction where the world is going. The spirit of the Cold War was created by Winston Churchill. It almost died two decades later, except that the Jews revived it and sustained it for another half century because it yielded large dividends for them. But the Cold War is practically dead now, and there is no reason to believe that it can be revived again. That's because Churchill has been fully discredited, and the Jews fully neutralized.

What we have now is a burgeoning mentality that harks back to the age of a precolonial era when international commerce in goods and services, as well as the exchange of cultural presentations were in vogue. Instead of those that have the power seeking to exploit those that don't have it the current trend is to help those that lag behind, catch up with those that are ahead. This way, everybody gets to contribute to the enlargement of the pie rather than everyone fighting to grab the largest piece in what used to be a zero-sum game.

The Russians, Chinese, Indians and Japanese are getting together with the Europeans, and working to develop the paradigms that will be used to build a magnificent city for all of humanity. The city will be flooded with millions of lights and will stand as a monument to what is good about the human species ... that which will triumph over the evil created by Winston Churchill and by the Jews who rushed to claim his mantle.

Standing in the shadow of Ronald Reagan who was a prodigious user of the witty one-liners, Bush 41 thought it wise to refrain from developing shibboleths proper to him that could turn out to be duds. When he was criticized for his shortcoming, he first complained about “that vision thing” but then asked his speechwriters to come up with something, and they came up with the thousand points of light … and it worked for him.

America is now standing in the shadow of tomorrow's giants who will be known for snatching the world form the jaws of Judeo-Churchillian darkness, and bathe it in the floodlight of a new chapter highlighting the human effort to further develop a Civilization that befits our talent as a unique species; one that may have no rival in the entire universe. Will America pull a Bush 41, and come up with a way to join those developing a city for all humanity?

We may be alone, having an entire universe all to ourselves. What are we squabbling about?