To write a good play for the stage or the audio-visual
screen—be it the big screen or the small one—the
story line must have a beginning, a middle and an end, among the many qualities
that should be there to maintain the interest of the audience from the start of
the show to the end.
Borrowing ideas from the theatre, one way to treat an
article that's meant to transmit facts and/or opinions, is to think of it as a
piece of writing that tells a story. This means you must include in it — among other things —
a beginning, a middle and an end; a technique that should make your piece stand
out as exceptional.
Up to now, most of the opinion pieces that were
written by members of the mob of Jewish pundits, did not use that technique, a
reality that made their pieces aesthetically unappealing, even when the authors
had their facts correct, which they almost never do
anyway. But now, there comes a piece that seems to violate that pattern, at
least in some places.
It is an article that came under the
title: “Can the United States Prevent Saudi Arabia from Getting Nuclear
Weapons?” and the subtitle: “It is clear that the Saudi's program is now
intimately tied to Iranian nuclear decision-making.” The article was written by
Emily B. Landau and Shimon Stein, and was published on December 4, 2018 in the
National Interest.
For a scenario to look and sound professional, you
need to take into account that transitioning from the beginning of the story to
its middle, and from the middle to the end — must be
done seamlessly. The way to accomplish this, is to let the motives of the
characters transport the audience from one situation to the next as the story
line develops. In fact, this is what you'll see happening in the Landau and Stein
article. What’s there, however, is a tormented motive; one that's hiding a dark
secret aching to burst into the open, but is held back by authors that dare not
speak its name.
As can be seen in the subtitle of the article, Landau
and Stein have alluded to the motive of the Saudis when they remarked that,
“the Saudi's program is intimately tied to the Iranian nuclear decision-making.”
There is certainly some truth to this observation. By the same token, however,
the mention of it should have prompted the writers to remind the audience that
the Iranian program itself, was and continues to be intimately tied to the
Israeli nuclear decision-making. This should hold true whether Israel has a
nuclear arsenal, or whether such claim is just another Judeo-Israeli piece of
juvenile theatrics; one that nevertheless, has
the potential to degenerate into a serious worldwide conflagration.
And this — from among
all the other things — is the dark secret
that's eroding the respect of the world that America had earned with her
exemplary performance throughout the first half of the Twentieth Century. It
all began to happen when the Jews relied on the cultural trait which allows
them to turn their fantasies of grandeur into fake stories. They engaged in
this game, and managed to win to their side a number of gullible suckers.
Repeating the game over and over again, the Jews
discovered that in America, the elites fear being seen out-of-step with the
mainstream, so they follow the crowd. Seeing the crowds gather around the Jews,
the suckers among the elites raced to become followers of the Jews. They swelled
the size of the crowds even more, and before you know it, the Jews had around
them what appeared like a good chunk of America. Enter stage right as well as
stage left, the Jewish leaders who used that phenomenon as “leverage” to get
the politicians that hunger for American votes, to work for Israel instead of
America.
This is how America became the guardian of Israel's
nuclear quackery — adhering to the Jewish
instructions of not confirming or denying if Israel had a functioning nuclear
arsenal it never tested. Still, this is what forced the Iranians to
prepare themselves to respond to Israel's threats in case the Jewish claim
turned out to be real. Unable to change this paradigm —
real or fake — America had no choice but to negotiate the
Iran nuclear deal it later saw fit to ditch.
The ramification has been that America's predicament
with the Iran situation, resulted in the rise of a similar kind of predicament
with North Korea. Here too, everything points to the reality that there is
virtually nothing America is able to do to solve the nuclear proliferation
issue safely, short of slapping the Jewish face, and coming clean with the
information it has on Israel's effort to develop a nuclear bomb.
As of now, America's governing elites — however muscular they may be — are
commanded by the Jewish weasel to remain silent on the subject, and they are
obeying.
And so, the drama that began with Israel, and moved on
to incorporate Iran in its middle, has now moved on to incorporate the Korean
Peninsula into what some people hope will be a happy ending.
But everyone sane knows there will not be a happy
ending unless America ditches the Jewish albatross around its neck, and come
clean with what it knows about Israel's nuclear quackery.