Do you remember a time when Representative Ilhan Omar spoke about
Israel hypnotizing the world?
You couldn't have missed it given that he sound and fury ––
inspired by the Neocons –– and let loose on the public by the mob of Jewish
pundits, overpowered the radio telescopes of the planet, thus temporarily
blocked the astronomers' ability to listen to the music of the stars … not to
mention the noise pollution that drowned everything audio-visual transmitted
through the ether here on Earth.
The net result was that the dwellers in the Heavens and those on
Earth, could hear nothing but the lamentations and the sobs as well as the
mumbling of the word: antisemitism, antisemitism, antisemitism. So guess what
happened right after that, my friend? Let me tell you what happened. The
flagship of the Neocon online magazine called The Bulwark, has finally admitted
the truth, and did so in spades.
It was Richard North Patterson who decided to write The Bulwark
article that informed the world of the Neocon admission. He wrote his piece
under the title: “A Betrayal Too Far,” and had it published on October 9, 2019
in The Bulwark, of course. Here is the opening sentence that contains the
Neocon admission: “Turkey's President Erdogan––a knave, but not a
fool––demonstrated his hypnotic powers over an American president who is both”.
Patterson leaves it to the reader to deduce that if one foreigner
can hypnotize America's most powerful leader, it must be that an entire mob of
foreign pundits pretending to be American by virtue of being Jewish, can
hypnotize America's politico-journalistic caboodle of knaves and fools, and
have them work for Israel, always Israel and no one but Israel, believing they
are working for America and the American people.
This said, what is it that Richard North Patterson and the Neocon
editors and publishers of The Bulwark really want? Since you asked, here is a
hint that will tell you what they want: “With US forces gone [out of Syria] the
Iranians can more easily supply the Hezbollah militia it uses to empower the
Assad regime, and menace Israel.” Got the hint? It means that Patterson and the
Neocons want America to spend American lives and borrowed money to stand as
sentinel, guarding Israel while it prepares to cause more mischief in the
Middle East, and rescue Israel when it gets into trouble from which it cannot
extricate itself.
But given that the Tel-Aviv/New-York crime syndicate has
overplayed its hand exploiting American generosity at a time when the call was
to sacrifice today's younger generation as well as the financial well-being of
tomorrow's generations –– things have changed in America. From the
politico-journalistic types falling over each other to become boot-licking Lindsey
Grahams, no one speaks of Israel's security anymore without yawning. For this
reason, Patterson and all those who promote the Judeo-Israeli agenda, feel
compelled to cite fake excuses before urging America to remain in the Middle
East. Here is what Patterson did:
“Trump has decided to bail out of Syria and leave Turkey, Europe,
Syria, Iran, Iraq, Russia and the Kurds … to figure the situation out. He left
the Kurds between Turkey and the Syrian regime which they must now
embrace––former allies who are critical in containing ISIS, which has 18,000
fighters. America has assigned the Kurds responsibility for supervising them
and their families. Now, the Russians can act with total impunity, while
continuing to manipulate the Turks in their effort to weaken NATO. The Iranians
will be able to thwart US sanctions by taking control of oil fields in eastern
Syria, undermining Trump's policy of maximum pressure. Trump has abetted Russia
by undermining American alliances and American credibility”.
Most of that display is based on conjecture that can neither be
proven nor be disproved. The writer is simply asking his readers to believe
that what he foresees will happen because he knows what he's talking about.
Some people will undoubtedly give him the benefit of the doubt and subscribe to
his point of view. But people who are fortunate enough to have some knowledge
of economics, especially that which relates to the petroleum industry, will
have been jolted so badly by what he said in this regard, they instantly viewed
him as a charlatan and a liar, not the lawyer they used to think deserved their
respect. Here is Patterson's undoing:
Iran has 160 billion barrels of oil in addition to 1,200 trillion
cubic feet of natural gas, which is the equivalent of 200 billion barrels of
oil. This would be a total of 360 billion barrels of oil equivalent (boe.) By
contrast Syria has only 2.5 billion barrels of oil, which comes to less than
one percent what Iran has. Thus, for Richard Patterson to suggest that Syria's
oil can in some way be of immediate benefit to Iran, is to make two colossal
mistakes: One mistake pertains to being ignorant about the significance of the
figures, the other mistake pertains to logic.
First, to believe that Iran will take a chance and go after
Syria's oil reserves, is to be ignorant of the meager value that Syria's oil
represents to oil-rich Iran.
Second, to say that the sanctions, which forbid Iran from selling
its own oil, will be thwarted when Iran will try to sell Syria's oil, is to tell
the world that Richard North Patterson does not have the logic ability of a
squirrel.