For a time now, the world has been visibly struggling to
reorganize itself. Big countries made big moves in this regard, and small
countries made small moves. Two of the big countries are Russia, which used to
be a part of the Soviet Union; and Britain, which is a part of the European
Union, but may soon no longer be.
Russia's move came under Boris Yeltsin who wanted to get rid of
the Soviet Republics that made up the Union, thus turn Russia into a totally
independent state. But he discovered that it was nearly impossible to make this
move given the constitution that was binding the Republics together. So,
Yeltsin took Russia out of the Soviet Union, a move that caused the complete
dissolution of the Union.
As to Britain, the situation, known as Brexit, is handled by Boris
Johnson who apparently dreams of forging a closer relationship with the United
States and the other English-speaking countries. And so, unlike Boris Yeltsin,
Boris Johnson wants to pull Britain out of one union to make it a part of
another union.
The desire to realign the nation's relationships is natural to the
human species. It is an extension of what happens regularly among individuals,
as well as families and clans. We all change friends and partners as we go on
with life. What is not natural, however, is the attempt to force a relationship
on those who do not want it. In fact, a move of this kind would look like a
forced marriage, and the consequence of it happening, is that it ends just as
badly.
There have been attempts in the past to organize former colonies
into “pacts” meant to stand up to the enemies of the organizers that happened
to be the former colonial powers, now joined by the United States of America.
But none of these pacts lasted long enough to make an impact, causing the
organizers to give up on the idea. So, guess what happened next. Yes, the Jews
came along and tried to organize the former organizers into exclusive clubs
that would be presided over by the Jews.
Even before Brexit had become a widely used term, the Jews were
working on organizing an exclusive club for what they called the democracies.
When they discovered that this was too big a morsel to swallow in one gulp,
they worked on making the club exclusive to the English-speaking democracies.
What encouraged them to make this decision was the idea of a Brexit that was
beginning to occupy a larger space in the public discourse. And so, the Jews
called on John Bolton, their most trusted lackey, and asked him to head the
group that worked on helping the Brexit forces in Britain win the referendum.
Aside from that effort, the Jews are working on organizing two
other exclusives: one micro and one macro. On the micro level, they want to
split the American society into a group that loves the Jews and a group that
either hates the Jews or remains indifferent to them. And they want to turn the
first group into an exclusive club. On the macro level, they want to split the
world into those that love Israel and those that either hate Israel or remain
indifferent to it. And they want to turn the first group into an exclusive cub.
You can see how the Jews are working on that last idea by reading
the article which came under the title: “Venezuela is not the only egregious
addition to the UN Human Rights Council,” written by Madeline Fry, and
published on October 18, 2019 in The Washington Examiner.
Madeline Fry began her discussion by assigning a false mandate to
the Human Rights Council of the United Nations. She said this: “The Council is
meant to criticize human rights abuses around the world.” No, this has never
been the mandate of the UN or any of its agencies. The UN was created in
recognition of the fact that nobody is perfect, and that everybody should get
together to review what they are doing that's wrong, and what they are failing
to do … and then decide on a better way to doing things.
But having herself decided on what the Council ought to be doing,
Fry went on to speak as if the world was made of two groups. She believes that
one group is made of bad actors, and one group––she considers to be an
exclusive club––brings together virtuous actors. The occasion that prompted her
to write, is that in its rotation of the members that sit on the Council,
Libya, Sudan and Venezuela, were called upon to serve.
Clinging to the idea that no one outside the club of virtuous
actors should sit at the table of the Council, Madeline Fry attacked the UN
General Assembly for voting to admit those three actors in defiance of the
Jewish delusion that only members of the virtuous club should sit on the
Council. They should be there, she believes, not to review the state of human
rights around the world and decide on making things better, but there to
criticize those like Libya, Sudan and Venezuela.
This being the case, who does she believe has the right to be in
the club of virtuous actors? Well, the club is there now, and it brings
together Israel and the United States of America. In the eyes of Madeline Fry
and her kind of Jews, Israel and the US are the only virtuous actors fit to sit
on a human rights council. They are not on the Council that’s affiliated with
the UN because that one is not fit to have them.
It must be that in their delusional state, those Jews believe that
their cause is proven to be a superior endeavor by the genocidal war which
Israel is conducting against the Palestinians to ethnic cleanse the Holy Land
of impurities. As well, the fact that America chose to go from beloved
superpower to hated icon of moral prostitution, proves that the US is standing
firm for the moral principle of helping the chosen children of God.
In fact, relying on their power to hypnotize the brain-dead
zombies, the Jews made the ruling-class of America believe that the more their
country borrows from foreigners to support Israel, and the more that American
boys and girls are sent to die defending Israel, the more that America gets
closer to being divine.