Israel, where the godfather of the worldwide Zionist movement now
resides, is in a mess culturally, militarily, economically, ethically and in
many other ways too. For these reasons, the instructions which are coming out
of Israel to collaborators in America and elsewhere, are beginning to sound
like the utterances of a godfather that has gone unhinged.
This effect can be sensed in two recently published articles. One
came under the title: “Should Israel invade Gaza?” and the subtitle:
“Negotiations, mediation, compromise, concessions and other gentle means have
replaced victory as an Israeli goal.” It was written by Daniel Pipes and
published on October 2, 2019 in Jewish News Syndicate. The other article came
under the title: “If it comes to war with Iran,” and the subtitle: “The correct
response would be to eliminate Iran's ability to project power beyond its
shores.” It was written by Gary Anderson, and published the next day, October 3,
2019 in The Washington Times.
What you'll find in common between the two articles is vintage
Nazi behavior. It is that both are advocating the humiliation of the enemy.
Daniel Pipes wants to humiliate the Palestinians; Gary Anderson wants to
humiliate the Iranians. But why did this attitude develop in the first place?
The answer is that, reacting to centuries of Jewish provocations, the Nazis
decided to do in one blow what the rest of Europe had been trying to do
piecemeal. And there were reasons for this to happen. Here is the story:
Kicked out of the Middle East after two thousand years of
committing mischief everywhere they went from the ancient Persian Empire to the
Egyptian Empire and all points in-between, the Jews ran away and settled in
Europe, bearing the status of beggars and supplicants. But true to their
nature, it took them little time to go from being beggars to being choosers.
And they had what they thought would justify such attitude. It is that they saw
themselves as the chosen children of God, and cousins of the Semitic Arabs
whose power was beginning to increase, standing as they were at the leading
edge of the new science as well as technology, mathematics, astronomy and the
instruments of war.
But as usual, things started to go downhill again for the Jews.
From Russia to England, the Europeans responded to Jewish provocations by
staging small scale pogroms aimed at kicking them out of the neighborhood. But
such acts only resulted in the Jews going somewhere nearby and doing the same thing
all over again. This is when the Nazis decided to tackle the Jewish problem
head on. They instituted a Holocaust style industrial program to destroy the
Jews en masse. To make sure that the remnants who will survive the operation
will not want to rise again, the Nazis mated the physical destruction of the
Jews with their humiliation as a group. This kind of collective punishment is
the attitude that Daniel Pipes and Gary Anderson inherited, and are trying to
emulate. What follows is a condensed version of what Daniel Pipes is
recommending that Israel do to the Palestinians:
“What should Israel's goal in Gaza be? It's time for something far
more ambitious. Victory is the goal. That is, aim to impose a sense of defeat
on Gazans, from the head of Hamas to the lowliest street sweeper. What are the
strategy and tactics? They require a detailed study of the Gazan population's
psychology. Does the deprivation of food, water, fuel and medicine inspire a
sense of resistance and steadfastness among Gazans, or does it break their
will? Same question about the destruction of homes, buildings and
infrastructure. This done, with victory as the goal, Israel can address the
problem of Gaza”.
And what follows is a condensed version of what Gary Anderson is
recommending that America do to the Iranians:
“The worst that the administration could do would be a
proportionate response. The correct response would be to totally eliminate the
Iranian ability to project military power. It would mean the destruction of
Iran's air defense system, ballistic missile systems, air force and navy. It
would also mean the destruction of Iran's entire oil infrastructure and
portions of its nuclear program that would not produce fallout. These strikes
would be followed by a blockade of Iran that would block everything. Any
attempt to rebuild strategic assets would trigger more strikes. We would likely
lose planes, ships and personnel in such a conflict before they lose their
capability to retaliate. Iran doesn't crave love, but weakness and humiliation
would be intolerable”.
What is lost on the young generation of American media and
political types, is that the Jewish terrorist organizations that launched the
conquest of Palestine in earnest in the middle of the twentieth century, used
the weapons of the Nazis and copied their method for making war.
When the Jews were condemned by the world, including America, they
created AIPAC to work in America on polishing the image of the Jewish
combatants. As can be observed, AIPAC has succeeded so well that nothing comes
out the mouth of an American official these days, which does not parrot the
words: Israel has the right to defend itself.
Not only that, but after every genocidal massacre of Palestinian
families in their homes in the middle of the night, using the most lethal of
American weapons, America rewards Israel with a gift that runs into the
billions of dollars.
Thus, what looks like the Israeli establishment going unhinged, is
not something that's new. In fact, being unhinged is a Jewish normal that's
kept under wrap as long as it pays to keep it there. But when the payment comes
to a stop, the normal Jewish behavior is unleashed on the world once again.