The Jewish Defense League (JDL) was
visibly active in America, disrupting the lives of law-abiding citizens till it
was recognized as being a terrorist organization and so labeled. This move forced
members of the JDL to cease operating under the old name but not cease
disrupting the lives of citizens.
What the members did is that, instead of
operating in open defiance of the law, they devised all sorts of ways by which
to trick the security apparatus of the country as well as its legal system to
do the dirty work for them, as they were now operating under different names.
One of the new names under which members
of the former JDL have been operating, is Committee for Accuracy in Middle East
Reporting in America or (CAMERA). This one began as an organization dedicated
to harass the media, forcing the print and electronic outlets to see
world-events and report on them from the extremely fanatic Jewish point of
view. When the Jewish Machine for the Control of America saw itself diminished,
it called on CAMERA to help it restore its tight grip on the country. Based on
the idea that the best way to control a vibrant society, is to do it by taking
control of its system of education, this is where CAMERA has turned its
attention.
To fulfill its new mandate, thousands of
young and not so young Jews were trained by CAMERA as well as other Jewish
organizations, in the guerrilla tactics of disrupting the functions of normal
human gatherings doing normal things. The guerrillas would descend on a
gathering, do their dastardly deed, and come out of there wailing that they
were discriminated against for no reason except that they are Jews. You can see
how one such event has played out, in an article that was written by Ben Stone,
a member of CAMERA.
The Stone article came under the title:
“Upholding the Values of Duke University in the Face of Antisemitism,”
published on October 29, 2019 in the Jewish online publication Algemeiner.
After wasting several paragraphs on a preamble during which time he spewed
useless polemics aimed at giving the readers the impression that the Jews had
managed to convince the US department of Human Health and Services that Duke
University was violating some law or some regulation, Ben Stone got around to
explaining how guerrilla tactics are conducted in a classroom setting. Here is
a condensed version of his account:
“I signed up for a class about the Middle
East, taught by Dr. Rebecca Stein. Her first course of action was to show us
selfies of IDF soldiers. She explained that they were taken while the IDF
occupying forces were waging a war in Gaza and killing innocent people. I
reasoned that this would be a good class to practice my debating skills. I
wanted to make the case for the other side, and argue that her opinions were
delegitimizing and demonizing Israel. It quickly became clear that I would not
be able to practice my debating skills, because she told us that we would only
discuss the documents she brought into class. These would obviously only
reflect her very biased and skewed views, and would not give the class an
objective view on the topic. I am open to studying articles and documents from
both sides of the conversation, but only if there is the possibility to discuss
the nuances of both”.
It is obvious from this account that Ben
Stone knew exactly what Dr. Rebecca Stein was teaching long before he
registered for the course. The CAMERA group targeted her and prepared him to
disrupt the class by confronting her under the guise that he was practicing his
debating skills, something that is never done with a professor while he or she
is lecturing. It is done at the end of the lesson among the students ... at
times under the guidance and moderation of a tutorial leader.
In telling the readers that he wanted to
make the case for the other side of the conversation by challenging the
professor, accusing her of taking a stand that's damaging to Israel, the
guerrilla has demonstrated that he was there, not to learn, but to impose his
views on a class of students who paid to hear the professor's lecture not his
views. In addition, when he added that the professor's views would not give the
class an objective view on the topic, he made it clear that his intent from the
beginning was not to learn but to lecture. Worse, he went as far as to assume
the role of overseer in charge of monitoring the faculty’s decisions when he
specified what kind of articles and documents he was open to seeing assigned
for study.
Now think about it, my friend. Many people
have questioned the wisdom of students asking for safe places on campus where
they can learn without being disrupted, and debate among themselves without
guerrillas raiding them and telling them to drop everything they do because the
guerrillas are Jews who are here bearing Holocaust stories to tell them about.
And the guerrillas threaten that the audience better listen because if it
doesn't, there will be stories written about this incident in newspapers, and
there will be complaints lodged with people in the administration and in
politics that have the power to punish.
Finally, it must be recognized that the
Jews have done America a great disservice when the rabbis embarked on a scheme
to “educate” the American public half a century ago. We now see the effect of
that education on a system of governance that has turned as dead as a skunk run
over by a truck, when it comes to working for America. But when it comes to
working for Israel or any of the Jewish causes, the system comes alive and
buzzes like a beehive.