Imagine a situation in which a Jewish high
executive completely dominating a young and attractive female aid that grew up
shunned by her peers because they were intimidated by her stunning beauty and
her opulent elegance. But she didn't know that, so she turned introvert,
believing there was something repulsive about her she can do nothing to fix.
The Jewish executive for whom she works,
initiated a sexual relationship with her by first raping her and then having
irregular encounters that would be consensual at times, and considered
statutory rape at other times. She tells no one of these encounters because, as
repugnant as she feels they are, they remain the only thing that's going for
her socially. And she doesn't want to lose her boss's interest in her because
of the greater fear that if she does, she'll be alone gain.
As it happens, however, this young woman
isn't the only one that the Jewish executive has been abusing. He's been doing
it to several other women, one of whom decided to speak publicly about what she
had to endure. Her bravery encouraged the other women to come forward and tell
their stories. The exception was the young aid that did not think it will do
her any good to join the other women in telling her story.
With lawsuits hitting the Jewish rapist
from every direction, he realized he'll soon go bankrupt as well as reviled by
everyone, including his wife who already filed for divorce. And so, he reckoned
that his only salvation hinged on marrying the young aid that kept her mouth
shut. She is after all, the daughter of a rich family, and slated to inherit a
fortune very soon. The information he has is that the fortune is a respectable
sum; one that's large enough to allow him carrying on with a lifestyle he
cannot part with.
Well, my friend, this is not an exact
analogy of what's going on in the world today, but it gives a sense of the
chutzpah that would motivate someone like Michael Makovsky to write an article
such as the one he wrote under the title: “The right way ahead after Trump's
Syria mistake,” published on October 20, 2018 in the New York Post.
Makovsky is the guy that founded a joint
he called “Jewish Institute for National Security of America.” Puzzled by the
mentality that has combined the three words “Jewish, national and America” in
one phrase, you wonder: What does this Jew want America to do for its own
security? You go over his entire article looking for clues, and by the time you
reach the end, you find that he has been barking a load of insolence like a
scared dog. He did so –– not because he worried what might happen to America
but –– because he worried what might happen to Israel.
Here is Makovsky's insolent barking as he
expressed it in the first paragraph of his presentation: “What should
Washington do now is the question following Trump's error of green-lighting
Turkey's invasion of Syria? The decision dealt a blow to US interests and
credibility. Trump MUST reverse course.”
And here is what he says America MUST do:
“Targeted military action is effective.
The United States MUST kill the ISIS fighters who escape. It MUST use diplomacy
and coercion to end Turkey's invasion, and begin removing assets from Turkish
bases. It MUST respond to Iranian aggression. Retaliation is necessary to
demonstrate that Trump doesn't shy away from confrontation. Expand the US
presence at al-Tanf. Forces there should engage Iranian-backed militias.
Bolster Israel's security whose position is perilous. The Jewish state faces
Hezbollah missiles, Iranian attempts to gain new footholds in Syria and Iran's
nuclear program. Israel is alone. That means America needs Israel even more.
The US should augment Israel's military capacity by accelerating delivery of
weapons and sharing military technology. A US-Israel defense treaty could
demonstrate that America isn't retreating from the region”.
That is, Makovsky wants America to
continue fighting against every enemy that Israel has made for itself. More
than that, he wants America to fight –– not as a friend that wants to protect
Israel but –– as if America was attacked by a foe determined to annihilate it.
And while America is engaged in a
do-or-die fight against Iran and its proxies, Makovsky wants the superpower to give
Israel the weapons it will use against the neighbors who would have been
weakened by America's campaign.
Even then, such giving would only
represent the finger that Makovsky envisages America transferring to Israel.
But these are Jews who –– when given a finger –– ask for the arm.
This is why, Makovsky is urging America to
also give Israel the military technology it wouldn't know what to do with,
except sell to the Chinese and get rich while America becomes more vulnerable.