Erielle Davidson says she is a law
student. She also writes a column for the Federalist. Fortunately or
unfortunately––depending on your perspective––this combination is providing us
with a case study on how the Judeo-Yiddish culture has contaminated the
original American culture, and sent it down into the sewer.
Davidson writes from the extreme fanatic
angle of the Judeo-Israeli perspective. The BDS movement being her current
preoccupation, she often writes about it to attack those who advocate it, and
defend those who argue abolishing it. That's what she did on October 25, 2019
when she published in the Federalist, a column that came under the title:
“Ilhan Omar Is Against Sanctions, Except When The Target Is Israel,” and the
subtitle: “Sanctions are very, very bad–unless they're slapped on Israel”.
This is a piece of haggling that is more
than 1100 words long, in which the writer basically says that Ilhan Omar is
pursuing the double standard of advocating sanctions on Israel but not on other
nations such as Iran, for example, or Syria or even the Palestinian Authority
or what have you.
But while accusing Omar of double standard
for defending the BDS movement, and rejecting the use of the Global Magnitsky
Act which is used to sanction other countries, Erielle Davidson pursues her own
brand of double standard by advocating the use of the Global Magnitsky Act to
sanction any country except Israel, while attacking supporters of the BDS
movement. And Davidson justifies her stance by making the following argument:
“'Locally-led boycott or divestment
campaigns' is the bucket in which Omar would likely argue her much-loved BDS
movement fits. But she fails to describe how or why 'locally-led boycott or
divestment campaigns' are any better than or superior to state-sponsored
sanction campaigns”.
And this is precisely how and why Erielle
Davidson has unwittingly cracked wide-open the case against her own much-loved
Jewish brand of fits. She has, in effect, explicitly demonstrated that when the
choice comes down to the American families deciding for themselves how to
manage their lives, and the government making the decision for them, the Jews
will always stand on the side of the (Jewish controlled) government making the
decision for the families.
In fact, this is the culture that the
rabbis brought to America half a century ago when they first embarked on
“educating” the American public. They succeeded in what they set out to do, and
we see the effect of that education now. Furthermore, we realize that what we
see is only the tip of the iceberg, knowing how feverishly the Jews are trying
to implement a plan whose ultimate goal is to take control of the system of
education from kindergarten to graduate school where America's future
generations will be taught to do nothing more than work for the Jews, and live
for the glory of Israel, always Israel and no one but Israel.
Thus, we can surmise that the battle,
which is taking shape at this moment between the Ilhan Omar group and that of
Erielle Davidson, is one that will pit those who work to give the power of
decision-making back to the people, and those who wish to concentrate still
more power into the already powerful hands of the Jews. The Omar group will
explain their thinking to the public, whereas the Davidson group will seek the
political bimbos who feel more comfortable going behind closed doors and
hearing Jewish whispers in their ears.
The good news is that we don't have to
guess who will win this battle in the end because Davidson has revealed her
hand, and it looks grim. Here it is: “The BDS movement is not about influencing
Israel's policies but about ending Israel's existence. The patchwork of
literature produced by BDS co-founder Omar Barghouti reveals that the BDS
movement is focused on the destruction of the Jewish state”.
Even if we assume that most of what's in
that piece of garbage is true –– which would be a miraculous event coming from
a Jew –– those of us who were old enough to be around before the name Barghouti
had popped onto the scene, remember that the boycott of Israel began before the
man was born. It happened when the Arab League asked its friends in governments
and businesses around the world to boycott Israel.
Many responded favorably to the Arab
appeal whereas a couple of governments –– the United States and the Canadian
Province of Ontario, for example –– responded with legislation designed to
counter the Arab boycott. The net result has been a very small difference either
way because government boycotts are easily circumvented, and because the
Israeli economy is of a kind that the President of the United States, Donald
Trump, would characterize as a shit-hole.
The lesson here is that aside from the
propaganda value that may prove to be valuable in some circumstances,
government interference in such matters does not help in any practical terms.
But what a move of this kind usually succeeds in doing, is raise the level of
anger among the people who do not like being told how to run their lives.
And this is why astute individuals such as
the American legislator, Ilhan Omar, has embarked on a campaign to give the
power of decision-making back to the people of America.
And so, my friend, if you want to guess
who will win this battle, here is your winner. She, and those like her, have it
within them to undo the damage that the Jews have inflicted on America during
the half century that they were permitted to lark about without someone telling
them off.