Danny Gold, who is Jewish, wrote a long article in which he
accused America of deliberately neglecting its duties. He spelled out some of
the things that America should have done but did not. Quin Hillyer is also a
Jew, and he wrote two articles in which he spelled out some of the duties that
America neglected to do.
Danny Gold's article came under the title: “Dereliction of duty,”
and the subtitle: “Why the abandonment of the Kurds is such a huge failure for
America.” It was published on October 13, 2019 in the New York Daily News. As
to Quin Hillyer, he wrote: “Anti-Semitism rises with bizarre perversity,”
published on October 14, 2019 in the Washington Examiner. He also wrote:
“Incompetence and impotence marked US retreat in Syria,” an article that was
published on October 18, 2019, also in the Washington Examiner.
Telling a long story about who did what to whom going back to the
1970s when America conspired with the Iranians to arm the Kurds and incite them
to fight the government of Iraq, Danny Gold skipped the most important aspect
of the region's history––extending from that time, if not before––to these
days. What he skipped is the role that the Jews have played and continue to
play in all the events where the flag that's displayed is American but the hand
that's controlling the levers of power and decision-making is Jewish.
In fact, the reason why America was conspiring with the Iranians
at the time, is because the Jews were friendly with the two non-Arab Muslim
countries in the region––Iran and Turkey––as Israel was trying to organize an
anti-Arab alliance with them. The intent was to work on breaking up the Arab
countries, thus make it possible for Israel, Turkey and Iran to control the pieces
like it used to be in the old colonial days.
The way that the Jews impress the others is to tell them: “we're
so much alike, and the others are so different, we should get together and
oppose them.” It is what they have been telling the Turks while kissing their
boots, and promising never to let the Americans lift the designation of
“terrorist” on the Kurds. Well, that was then. Look now what Danny Gold is
saying about the Turks and the Kurds, speaking in the name of the Jews in
Israel, America and everywhere else. Who will be so insane as to believe a word
these people say?
As to Quin Hillyer, he has two messages concerning America's
duties. One message pertains to America's duty toward the Jews living in
America; the other message pertains to America's duty toward the Jews living in
Israel. In his article about the rise of anti-Semitism in America, Hillyer says
this: “The truth is that if here is any one collective people whose culture
promotes good citizenship and intentional contributions to the civic weal, it
is the Jewish people who are models”.
You go through the article to see what kind of civic “weal,” the
Jews work to alleviate, and find none. The reason is simple. There is awareness
that societies throughout the world and through history, have lived peaceful
lives till the Jews settled among them. That's when civic trauma of various
kinds began to manifest themselves. It happened when the Jews demanded that
they be given something at the exclusion of others. This raised resentment
among the masses, yet the will of the Jews was almost always imposed on them.
At that point, opposition to the Jews burst into the open, and the
latter rushed to call it anti-Semitism. This is the point in the cycle at which
we find ourselves today. And so, what the Jews want now to remedy the
situation, is that the mind-bending Holocaust stories be hammered into the
tender psyches of America's schoolchildren so as to raise a generation of
docile American adulators who will live to kiss Jewish boots, and do nothing more
useful in their lives than profess their undying love for the Jews.
But if you believe that Jewish tampering alone cannot create that
kind of situation, look what Quin Hilliyer says happened during the
“disastrous” withdrawal of America's troops out of Syria. From there, you'll be
able to determine what influence might have caused much of what ails America
today. In fact, in the 42 words that make up the opening paragraph of Hillyer's
article, he managed to compress these explosive notions: “The utter foolishness
of President Trump”, “decision to betray”, “risk reinvigorating”, “a boost to
Islamist Turkish thug Erdogan”, “sheer incompetence”, “mind-boggling” and
“disastrous”.
Why all this? Because there was a better way to doing that thing,
says Hillyer, but America failed to pursue it. And so, he spelled out the
better way. And this is what he said:
“There is no reason for a bad decision to be carried out in a way
this embarrassing and deadly. If the withdrawal was to occur, it should have
been planned, organized, and done with protection. It should have included
clearly delineated and enforceable understandings applicable to all parties”.
So, why was this not done? It was not done because the Americans
have learned through repeated experiences––most of them bitter ones––that
because the Jews have their hands on the levers of power as well as having an
iron-fist monopoly on the media, no rational discussion can be held without it
deteriorating into everyone expressing their undying love for Israel. Failing
this, the discussion is blown like a hand grenade in the faces of the
attendees.
Also, if by some miracle, a workable decision is reached and
implemented, not even a fraction of a second after that, does the Jewish mob go
into the beehive mode of working to reverse the decision. Sometimes, when the
decision is not yet finalized but appears inevitable, the mob begins to plot
reversing it.
This gets everyone back to square one where they are retrained on
how to love Israel, and do nothing more useful with their lives.
For these reasons, the non-Jewish executives that have business
experience, do things as quickly as they can, and do them in a way that comes
as close as possible to being “Jewish resistant” irreversible.