Let
me begin this discussion by clarifying a historical event that's used by the
Jewish mutilators of history to turn themselves into victims, thus claim
privileges that no one else has.
In
the same way that just a few years ago, the Jewish pundits and self-styled
historians used to invoke the events of 1938 to claim that the Arabs and the
Muslims of today were leading humanity to a world war, they are now invoking
the Nazi requirement of the 1930s that the Jews wear a yellow star, to claim
that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is singling out the Jews
for discrimination. They were proven wrong when they accused the Arabs a number
of years go; they are wrong accusing the CJEU today.
What
happened with the false claim of 1938 was that people familiar with the
deviousness of the Jews pointed out that it was the Israelis and not the Arabs
who emulated the Nazi annexation of the neighbors' lands, a move that led to
the Second World War. Likewise, annexing lands that belong to Syria and
Palestine, is what Israel is doing today, and that's what has the potential to
lead to war. Faced with a strong rebuff by people who did their
homework––including this website––the Jews shut the heck up.
As
to their new quarrel with the CJEU, the Jews now claim that requiring the
labeling of products as being made in the West Bank, which is occupied
territory, rather than say they were made in Israel, which is the occupying
power –– is the same as requiring the Jews to wear the yellow star during the
Nazi era. Of course, this is a false and devious claim designed to make the
Jews look like victims when in reality, they are the wrongdoers trying to
victimize the Palestinians even more than they are doing it already.
The
goal of the CJEU ruling is to give the European masses a way to know where a
product was made, therefore freely choose between encouraging the occupation of
the West Bank or boycotting the companies that operate there in contravention of
international law. What the CJEU has blocked is the Jewish ability to lie to
the public with a label that says made in Israel when the product is actually
made in occupied Palestine under atrocious conditions.
In
fact, never before did an occupying power make products in a colony, and
labeled them made in the occupying country. For example, products made in
Algeria were labeled made in Algeria and not France. The same goes for the
Congo and Belgium; for Rhodesia and England; for Indonesia and Holland and so
on and so forth. And no company from anywhere in the world would today make a
product in occupied Palestine and voluntarily label it made somewhere else ––
but the Jews want to make an exception for themselves and the European High
Court responded. It said: No, you cannot make us a party to your demonic
deception. The subtle message being that just because the moral prostitutes of
America allow the Jews to regularly screw their people, does not mean that the
Jews can go to Europe and try the same stunt on their people. They respect each
other out there; they are not Americans.
In
fact, when you take a close look at this scheme, and when you place it in the
context of what has transpired during the past half century, you'll come to the
conclusion that the Jewish plan is to have the whole world participate with
them in the cultural cleansing of Palestine by the simple act of unguarded
people, innocently buying products made in occupied Palestine but labeled made
in Israel. Europe found a way to protect itself and its people against this
horrendous crime, and we should hope that the rest of the world, especially
America, will wake up to this reality and follow suit.
You
can familiarize yourself with the reaction of America's mob of Jewish pundits
to the European ruling, by reading the article that came under the title:
“European Union Slaps 'New Kind Of Yellow Star On Jewish-Made Products'” and
the subtitle: “A survey of 2,504 French adults found that 69 percent of
respondents would not buy products labeled 'made in Israel.'” It was written by
Melissa Langsam Braunstein and published on November 19, 2019 in The
Federalist.
Braunstein
quotes a number of Jewish lawyers who argue, as usual, that the latest
controversy has nothing to do with the politics of occupation, and everything
to do with the new anti-Semitism that's rearing its ugly head in Europe. But
when, you read a passage like what follows, you can’t help but ask yourself:
Who are they kidding? Here is that passage: “If a consumer factors politics into
those decisions and wants to avoid Israeli goods, why is it so important to
specify where in Israel those goods are produced?” There it is, my friend; did
you catch the Freudian slip of the tong? The passage calls the whole place
(including the West Bank) Israel. This is how the Jews want to erase Palestine
from the face of the Earth. Yes indeed; who are they kidding?
Here
is another revealing passage: “A survey of French adults found that 69 percent
would not buy products labeled made in Israel. That number rose to 75 percent
if labels read West Bank, Israeli colony/settlement. So, more detailed labeling
would clearly shift some shoppers' habits, but those figures are already high”.
And
this is what tells you, the reader, that the potential loss of money, money,
money (as in Benjamins) is another motivation for the Jews to shout
anti-Semitism at the European Court.