A mole is a small insect that lives inside a fruit, eating from
it, defecating in it and reproducing inside it. A metaphor arose around the
mole, representing the individual humans who would infiltrate a functioning
organization and sabotage its work from the inside.
This has been the unintended effect of William Buckley's essay
(later turned into a book) which he wrote under the title: “In search of
anti-Semitism.” Interpreted by the Jews as an effort by William Buckley to
question the attitude of the conservative stalwarts of the day toward the Jews,
the latter saw the conservative movement as being on the defensive, put there
by one of their own. And so, the Jews who were the stalwarts of the liberal
movement, switched to the conservative side and became known as the
neoconservatives or neocons.
The Jews did not waste time working on dominating the conservative
movement the way they had managed to dominate the liberal movement. It took
them little time to become the liberal mole inside the conservative movement in
the same way that they had been the authoritarian mole inside the liberal
movement. The net effect is that the Jews spoiled both movements while transforming
them into institutions dedicated to serve nothing and no one but Israel and the
various Jewish causes.
Today, some Jewish leaders are witnessing a massive revolt of
their liberal base against the blind allegiance to Israel they once imposed on
their followers. They feel that antisemitism is rising on the hard-Left of the
movement. Other Jewish leaders see a conservative base that is split between
those who pledge fanatic allegiance to Israel, and those who yearn for a return
to the old days of opposition to the infusion of Jewish precepts into their
culture. And this is what the Jewish leaders perceive as a return to an
antisemitic attitude on the alt-Right of the movement.
Pushed out of many strategic institutions which the Jews used to
dominate, those who lead the conservative movement today, are trying to return
to their old positions through the backdoor, so to speak. They have calculated
that they can get there by first indoctrinating a new generation of Americans
with what they call the precepts of freedom. What they want to do is plant
moles into schools and colleges, thus gain control of America's children from
when they are toddlers to when they'll pursue a college degree.
You can see how they'll try to accomplish this feat from the
blueprint that was described by one of their architects. He is Scott Walker who
wrote: “Bringing conservatism back to colleges,” an article that also came
under the subtitle: “How organizations like Young America's Foundation (YAF)
make a difference.” The article was published on November 21, 2019 in The
Washington Times.
This is not something new. In fact, the right-wing Jewish
institutions have all sorts of organizations like YAF, trying to do what Scott
Walker wants to duplicate. They are failing for the simple reason that they do
not understand what freedom is. When they go on a campus and try to impose
their brand of freedom on those who wish to remain free of indoctrination, they
get the kind of push back that a rapist would get from the woman who would say
to him: Get away from me, you animal. What you're trying to do is not give me
love; it is violating my person and robbing me of my dignity.
Look what Scott Walker is saying and judge for yourself:
“Despite having the deck stacked against us, we must find a way to
make a greater impact. We need to expand the impact of YAF. The young people of
America need to hear about the benefits of conservative values. YAF educates
and inspires young people to defend and articulate free enterprise principles.
YAF is an incredibly effective organization. Looking to the future, it has to
build off of that success. Here are some clear goals: There should be a YAF
chapter on every campus. In addition to expanding chapters on high school
campuses, YAF should aim to reach students at an earlier age––ideally in their
pre-teens”.
One wonders what William Buckley would be saying to Scott Walker
had he not died prematurely sitting behind his desk promoting the true values
of conservatism. Leading by example rather than the forced indoctrination of
pre-teens, Buckley would most certainly have found the ideas of Scott Walker
abhorrent, and would not have been afraid to tell him so in the face.