Tuesday, November 5, 2019

When the Policeman goes rogue, you fire him

When the enmities among the European hardcore colonial powers and the wannabe colonial powers, rose to a high level, they resulted in the First World War. When the enmities among the same actors intensified due to the mishandling of the aftermath of the first war, they resulted in the Second World War.

Both wars were in reality only European wars, but were given the name World War because America participated in them. Actually, it was a reluctant America that was dragged into these wars, having no real interest in distant disputes. Initially, America was kept away by the Atlantic Ocean and a self-sufficiency in the resources that the Europeans lacked and were fighting each other for the right to steal from their African and Asian owners. But small incidents that happened by accident and that damaged American property, in addition to pleas by the Europeans, convinced the Americans they should get involved in their wars.

By the middle of the twentieth century––at the end of the Second World War––Europe was so devastated and America had remained so intact, it was natural for America to assume the role of world policeman. But seeing America perform so well militarily, yet so poorly diplomatically, the colonial powers that were friendly to America, worked out some grand ideas for their newly discovered friend. They began with this: Policeman? What policeman? They didn't want a policeman for the world; they wanted a gladiator to do the dirty work for them. And so, the Brits got America to start the Cold War against its former ally, the Soviet Union. And France got America to take charge of the Vietnam quagmire in which it was embroiled.

A decade or two later, the Jews that benefited the most from America defeating the Nazi war machine, turned out to have a colonial appetite that made the Brits and the French look like anorectic colonial operators. In fact, the Jews wanted the American gladiator to bomb and destroy the Arab and Muslim worlds for them to walk into the resulting desolation and take the spoils. The Jews also wanted such performance to be a prelude to conquering the world in accordance with the designs of a biblical promise they had imagined long ago, and a Pax Americana that will come under their control, which they hoped will be the case.

Unfortunately for the Jews, none of those plans worked well for an America that found itself applying the Midas Touch in reverse to everything it touched. The problem was that the hand America used to do the touching, was getting its signals, not from Washington but from Tel Aviv. And like the Sorcerer's Apprentice that kept messing things up the more he tried to fix them, the Jews sent America deeper into the cesspool of defeat, the more they tried to extricate it from the worthless adventures to which they kept sending it.

But following those defeats, did the Jews stop to give America time to catch its breath and decide for itself what to do next? Not on your life. These people never stop pushing ahead even when they find themselves racing on the wrong pathway. And so, true to themselves, you'll find them do what Dennis Ross has just done. He wrote an article under the title: “The US: Between Being the World's Policemen and Trusting Regional Partners,” published on October 28, 2019 on the website of the Washington Institute.

Reading the article, you get the sense that Dennis Ross wrote his piece for two audiences at the same time. They would be the leaders of America and those of the Arab World. You catch him remind the Americans that they still have what he calls the hard power in the region, as demonstrated by the operation they mounted to find and kill Al-Baghdadi, head of ISIS. But Ross also acknowledged that the American people are tired of seeing their country involved in a never-ending war in the Middle East; an adventure that is costing the country lives and treasure beyond what is tolerable and so, they want out of that region.

You also catch Dennis Ross in the act of trying to give the Arab leaders a lesson about which they would want to tell him: “take that lesson and shove it”. To understand this part, it is important to be abreast of what's unfolding economically in some parts of the Arab world. Like it happens everywhere else on the globe, when an economy transitions from one state to another, dislocations occur that benefit some people and hurt other people. This is happening now in countries like Iraq, Lebanon, Algeria and Sudan –– nothing unusual there.

The leaders in these countries––like their counterparts in China, South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, Egypt, Tunisia and Libya before them––are trying to cope the best they can with the situation. The last thing they need at this time, is someone like Dennis Ross, who wouldn't know an economy from a hole in his anatomy, telling them that their problem has to do with them being Arabs or Muslims. Look how he ended his lecture:

“The lesson for all Arab governments is to produce better governance and continuing modernization, and reforms that can be seen and felt by their publics”.

I can almost hear the Arabs say to him: Shove it and get the hell out of here. You're fired.