At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Jews pulled their favorite disinformation trick by calling on their bimbos out there to start discussing the prediction that Israel will drag America with it, and together will develop the vaccine that will cure humanity of the pandemic. This should happen next week, they opined, but if not, it will most certainly happen in America and Israel before someone else gets there.
The idea is that regardless of
what happens after the passage of time, the first impression that people get
about a news event, is what sticks in their mind no matter how false the
prediction proves to be in the future. In fact, this is why in the mind of many
Americans, especially the political fruitcakes of the Washington Beltway, the
belief persists that Israel is more than a Third World country even if it is
sustained by donations and so-called compensation that pour into its bottomless
coffers from around the world.
Well, the Jews have done it
again. They got Timothy Kaldas to write a piece in that same vein for Bloomberg
News under the title: “Why Egypt Didn't Profit From Peace With Israel As the
UAE Will,” and the subtitle: “The Emirates are not burdened by the legacies of
war that handicap Egyptians.” It was published on September 10, 2020 on the
website of Bloomberg News.
As can be seen in the title
where there is mention that the UAE will gain something, the potential that
this may turn out to be a lie, is revealed immediately thereafter. You can see
it in the first paragraph of the article where the writer began the discussion
with these words: “The agreement between the UAE and Israel seems to have hit a
snag.” Was Kaldas still thinking that Egypt could have gained something it did
not pursue?
And when it comes to that word
“profit,” what does it mean in this context? When you think about it, profit is
one part of a binary system called zero-sum-game. So then, if Egypt and/or the
UAE were slated to gain something, who was slated to lose so as to make the
math work? Timothy Kaldas does not say it openly, but the suggestion in his
article is that America would be the giver, therefore the willing loser … as in
sucker.
In fact, true to form, the
Jews are asking America to give to Israel in the mode of the “coming and
going.” That is, when Israel is at odds with someone (that’s coming,) such as
killing 2,100 Palestinians in Gaza, it gets rewarded with a billion dollars in
cold cash from America. And when Israel comes up with a friendly agreement with
someone (that’s going,) such as having an understanding with the UAE, it gets
billions of dollars deposited into its interest-earning American account. This
is money that's supposed to buy American weapons, but nobody is checking
because if someone does, he's labeled an anti-Semite and canceled.
Looking at this evidence, no
one can doubt that the Timothy Kaldas article is an authentic production of the
Jewish propaganda machine. But despite this reality, is there a sign –– however
faint it may be –– that in the name of historical accuracy the writer has tried
to set the record straight concerning a lie that was put out long ago and
picked up by the bums who incessantly repeated it in the echo chamber? No,
there is no sign of an effort to set the record straight. Here is the passage
in the article that tells this story:
“President Anwar Sadat's
decision to make peace helped pave Egyptian access to American arms and
military aid after he had downgraded ties with the Soviet Union and expelled
Soviet military advisers”.
This version is different from
what normally comes out the echo chamber of the Jewish propaganda machine. What
comes out is that Henry Kissinger masterminded the ouster of the Soviets from
Egypt and brought Sadat into the American camp. Well then, does that passage
say Timothy Kaldas has set the record straight? No it does not. It simply says
he skirted the issue so deftly, he neither fell into the trap of telling an
outright lie, nor told the truth. He left the events as murky as they have
always been, and moved on to complete what he was commissioned to do.
Here is the truth that Kaldas
should have told but did not. Having warned the Jews and the Americans that
Egypt was going to start mobilizing to liberate the Sinai, Anwar Sadat had in
mind to inform the American President Richard Nixon that he will not cross the
border into Israel because all he wants, is to retake what the Jews had taken
by force of arms. And so, lest anyone believe that the Russians will be helping
the Egyptians in the upcoming assault, Sadat told the Russian advisers to
leave Egypt, and they left in June of 1972. It took the country a year and four
months to mobilize, and when this was completed, Sadat asked Nixon not to come
to Israel's aid because Egypt will not cross the border into Israel. He then
ordered the Egyptian military to start the counterattack in October of 1973.
That’s 16 months after the Soviets departed.
Up to the start of the
Egyptian counterattack, Henry Kissinger had nothing to do with the Middle East,
being too busy with the China and Vietnam situations. But when the Egyptian
assault smashed through the Bar Lev line in hours, Kissinger was called upon to
intervene and arrange a ceasefire.
Instead of doing that, Kissinger
surprised everyone by coming up with an idea that was his own. He said, let
them fight it out a little more so that they get exhausted and beg for a
ceasefire. But since Israel was already on its knees with Golda Meir having
prepared the poison she'll ingest when the Egyptians cross into Israel, and
Moshe Dayan suffering a mental breakdown from which he never recovered,
Kissinger decided to help Israel withstand the fight for a few more hours.
He ordered the NATO forces in
Europe to use unmarked planes and supply Israel with weapons and munitions
directly where the battles were ongoing. At the time, there came persistent
reports that should be confirmed or denied by America, to the effect that the
pilots flying those planes were American Jews calling themselves Israelis for
the occasion. It was also said that they bombed their way through Egyptian
defenses to get to the embattled Israeli military and deliver help.
If any of this is true, it will be a stain that will live forever on Henry Kissinger's record, having prolonged the war and added to the number of dead for no good reason. And when this happens, today's accepted truth may become tomorrow's newly uncovered lie.