Monday, January 18, 2021

The best Foreign Policy is, 'Live and let live'

 If you see fault in the cults that preach pessimistic philosophies and conclude that human beings are fundamentally evil therefore must continually fight for survival or perish, you'll see merit in the philosophies that preach, 'live and let live'.

 

It was the wrong interpretation of Charles Darwin's, “Survival to the fittest,” that gave rise to the pessimistic philosophies. In fact, Darwin did not mean to say anything like that literally, and certainly never said that fighting among the same species guaranteed its survival. It was people like Adolph Hitler that said war among humans was the highest form of civilized conduct, thus went on to destroy those he deemed were physically weak in society.

 

So then, what happens when you begin your philosophical quest with the notion that human beings are fundamentally good? What happens is that you do not undertake activities that can be interpreted by your neighbors as aggressive. When you have the opportunity to communicate with them, you let them know you have no intention to interfere in their affairs because you do not view kindly anyone interfering in yours.

 

Being neighbors, however, and having a common destiny despite the cultural differences that may keep you apart, you tell your neighbors you wish to expand on your interactions so that you get to understand each other, even voice in a friendly way, concerns you might have about practices you see in others; behavior that leaves you a little unsettled at times.

 

Whereas this kind of give-and-take repeats itself in real life among individuals, tribes and nations around the globe, there are those who continually try to poison the well by injecting their pessimistic views concerning the current state of affairs among the nations. And they recommend to governments, taking the kind of actions that would fulfill their prophesies.

 

Jed Babbin comes close to doing just that in his latest article. It came under the title: “Biden's first hundred days of foreign policy,” and the subtitle: “It's impossible to be optimistic about how Biden will deal with China and North Korea.” The article was published on January 16, 2021 in The Washington Times.

 

Look how Babbin started his presentation, shown here in condensed form: “Biden is about to begin his administration. The media will try to manufacture an [idyllic] image for him regardless of what happens.” This being the start of a 900-word article, I get hit with two culturally-based streams of thought concerning what I believe I'll encounter throughout the article.

 

Having lived 56 years in Canada and being very much a product of the Canadian culture, I think to myself, “do not judge this book by its cover.” However, born to Egyptian parents who steeped me in the Egyptian culture from birth, I still respond to the influence of that culture and think: “Judge the content of every missive by its sender.” The two sayings being somewhat at odds with each other, I ask myself: What shall I do with a coin that has Canada on one side and Egypt on the other? Shall I toss it in the air, and see which side will prevail?

 

Lucky for me, I don't have to do that, because I have 900 of Jed Babbin's words that tell what I should think of his article. Here is a montage of some excerpts you'll encounter when reading the article:

 

“The next 100 days won't be all rainbows and unicorns for Mr. Biden because it will be a period of danger and risk. Our enemies are lining up to challenge him and our allies are eager to see how soft he will be on ally and enemy alike. New presidents are tested by a foreign policy crisis in their first few months in office and Mr. Biden will be no exception. Iran's regime let our hostages go rather than risk what Ronald Reagan might do. Judging by his campaign promises, China and Russia expect Mr. Biden to take a weak approach to them. Iran won't start a war. It expects being relieved of the Trump sanctions that have rendered its economy a shambles. North Korea's economy is also suffering greatly from Mr. Trump's sanctions. Last year, its trade shrank by 80%. Kim Jong-un's only goal is sanctions relief”.

 

Bizarre logic isn't it? Jed Babbin starts by saying America's adversaries are evil, and they will test Joe Biden by doing something naughty in the first 100 days of his presidency. But by the time he gets to the end of his presentation, he admits that Iran will not start a war because all it wants is sanctions relief. As to North Korea's Kim Jong-un, Babbin says, he has only one goal; it is again sanctions relief. And this prompts you to yell: That's what makes them evil?

 

Still, this is not the only shocking thing you'll encounter in Babbin's article. Look what else he did. Even though he said America’s adversaries will be the ones to start something, he now claims that Iran let the hostages out because it feared that Ronald Reagan would be the one to start something naughty. Well, you’re not shocked because it is no more shocking than to say good people seeking sanction relief are evil. True, but that’s not the whole story. Here is the whole story:

 

Between his election in November 1980 and his inauguration in January 1981, Ronald Reagan contacted the government of Iran and asked them what they wanted in return for letting the hostages out on the day he'll be inaugurated, so as to add joy to the festivities. They said they wanted shoulder-held anti-air Stinger missiles. And Reagan said, you'll get them. Because he could not ship the missiles from America's stockpile, Reagan had them shipped to Iran from the stockpile in Israel.

 

Ever since that time, those who wrote about this incident, have perpetuated the myth that the Iranians were so astute, they guessed that Hollywood's actor of B movies, was made of steel, and would annihilate them if they did not release the hostages on the day of his inauguration. Nonsense.

 

Here is my friendly advice to the Americans: Stop lying to yourselves and the world, and adopt the adage that says: “Live and let live.” You got away with naughty things in the past because you were a rising power. You are no more. What happens now is that every time you lie, you show your naked ass, and people around the world feel disgusted by your behavior.