Playing the game of rival against rival always starts innocently. It is meant to give the players a necessary experience for survival while joyfully experiencing the winning of one round while knowing that you will inevitably lose another round at another time.
We, members of the human
species, have inherited a trait from the carnivores that hunt for food. It is
the playing of physical games that serve as training to prepare us for when we
must fight a defensive war, or one of premeditated aggression. The moment that
the young carnivores can stand on their legs, they engage in playful games that
help them sharpen their reflexes, strengthen their muscles, and help them
develop techniques to overpower the prey.
Left to themselves, human
children tend to engage in similar activities among siblings and with other
children. When they see them play rough, the adults intervene to make sure that
the children do not go as far as hurt each other. Whereas the carnivores
instinctively know there is a demarcation line between the training game and
the actual hunt, children of the human species are taught that sportsman-like
games and training for war, are not meant to harm the opponent.
As in all human endeavors, the
rules and principles of physical interactions, have analogues in human
non-physical interactions. In the way that children play to train for the
battles of the future, adults engage in battles of wit. They do it for training
purposes, but also to win a prize that can be as pricey as a
multi-million-dollar court case or getting elected president of the nation. In
fact, life for some people, is a continuous engagement in battles of the wit
with rivals.
Like everywhere else in the
world, Americans used to treat court cases as a forum where the dispensation of
justice was paramount. Justice was reached via the battles of the wit, and did
not cross the line separating the sportsman-like combat from the kind of
confrontation that seeks to win the case at any cost. But then the Jews came
along and reversed that order. They made it so that winning the case for his
client was paramount to a litigation lawyer, which result he must attain by
hook or by crook. And it was from this courtroom approach, acting like a poison
pill, that the Jewish style adversarial system was swallowed by every aspect of
American culture.
Despite the protestations that
Jews are being used as scapegoats yet again, you can be certain that it was the
Jewish poison pill which led to the current cancel culture, the sharp divisions
between the political factions, and the riots that gave American streets the
look of a Third World. “Tikkun Olam” is the Hebrew command that supposedly
gives the Jews the right to burn the world so as to rebuild it in a way that
will serve them better. And the Jews take that command very seriously.
Now that they succeeded doing
it to America, the Jews want to use America to do it to the world. You can see
an example of that when you study the article which came under the title:
“Europe capitulates to China's rulers,” and the subtitle: “The EU undermines
its own interests and those of its ally across the pond.” It was written by
Clifford D. May, and published on January 5, 2021 in The Washington Times.
Like every aggressor that
wants to be thought of as the savior of humanity, Clifford May spoke in the
name of all Jews without first obtaining their permission. He laid out the
reasons why Europe must not get cozy with China or Russia or Iran. But first,
he had to introduce the subject to his readers, and so he offered the following
preamble:
“Authoritarians are
increasingly assertive and audacious. Americans and Europeans should be working
more cooperatively than ever before. They're not. It is in the European Union's
interest to defend its members from the machinations of authoritarians. Give me
a few moments to make the case clearly”.
This done, Clifford May went
on to tell how evil China, Russia and Iran have been. The following is the
condensed form of what he said about them:
“The world's leading
authoritarians are in Beijing. They are oppressing minorities within the
borders of the people's Republic of China, which is a thief of intellectual
property. Its spies are everywhere. It manipulates the World Health
Organization. It clashes with India, builds islands in the South China Sea and
disputes Japan's possession of the Senkaku Islands. It bullies Australia and
threatens Taiwan. The Kremlin has appropriated territory from the neighbors,
and been implicated in assassinations and assassination attempts in Europe and
on Russian soil. The Islamic Republic of Iran conducted missile attacks against
Saudi Arabian oil facilities and has executed the journalist Ruhollah Zam. It
violates the nuclear deal”.
What Clifford May deliberately
and foolishly rejects, is that the Europeans are telling America they are not
playing this game anymore.
Save for the excesses of
America’s darkest chapters, the Europeans are conscious of their own colonial
past. They see in it the kind of evil that must never be duplicated or
exceeded.
And they recognize that
anything legitimately attributable to China or Russia or Iran, is trivial
compared to what they have themselves committed.
Except for the following lesson to America, they will not pretend to have the moral standing to give lessons to anyone: If you do not want to capitulate, do not start a war.