We lie to hide our failings or embellish our successes. This is the undeniable part of the human condition.
Many of the lies that we tell
go undetected because most people do not bother fact-checking what they hear
from others. That's because life is too complicated, and people opt to use
their time doing something more useful such as work on the lie by which they
hope to hide something objectionable they committed, or because they wish to
embellish a small success they scored; one they had hoped was a bigger success.
Aside from the personal
reasons why people lie, there are causes for which some people, known as
fanatics, are willing to die. And as you can imagine, would be willing to lie
for. In fact, if and when such people feel they must, they turn a lie into a
dogma that their successor must believe-in like a religious absolute.
One of the oldest fanatic
groups still operating today has adopted causes that never lend themselves to
reaching a happy ending. The group, known as Jews, has been around trying to
accomplish the unthinkable for thousands of years. It has gone to all the
places around the globe, and has done what it calls “fighting” for one lost
Jewish cause after another, never accomplishing anything that was not
calamitous.
The Jews are now in America
fighting anew the battles they have been losing since time immemorial. An
example of what they do is illustrated in an article that came under the title:
“Fighting Back for Israel on Campus,” written by Julian Michanie, and published
on January 20, 2021 in the online Jewish publication, Algemeiner. Note that
Israel has become the newest cause for which the Jews are fighting with a
fanatic zeal never seen before.
Look at this portion of the
opening sentence in the article: “anti-Israel advocates have not diminished
their attacks on pro-Israel advocates and Jewish students on campus.” It is in
keeping with the Jewish method of starting a discussion by pulling the wool over
the readers' eyes. What Julian Michanie has done here, is pave the way for
telling the readers that to oppose Israel's anti-Palestinian apartheid, is to
attack and hurt the Jewish students in America.
Michanie says that despite the
fact those opposing apartheid express themselves via the peaceful process of
letting the American people know the reality of the situation, those advocating
the boycott of such goods, are doing it to hurt the Jewish students on American
campuses. He wants the readers to believe that those advocating the boycott do
not care that Jewish bosses use Palestinian laborers, and work them inside the
stolen Palestinian homeland. No, says Michanie, these people are anti-Semites
that found an excuse to practice their antisemitic hobby … and that's all they
are doing.
This is like home invaders
invading your home, forcing you and your family to cook enough meals for them
and for selling to customers outside the neighborhood, and then complaining
that you are hurting them, not because of what they do, but because you are
antisemitic and they are Jews. Here is how Julian Michanie put it: “These
resolutions have one thing in common: They are a gateway for antisemitism
disguised as a political movement to help Palestinians.” Now, my friend, imagine
the gall it takes to say something like this.
At this point the writer
shifted gears. Instead of attacking others, he decided to start defending
Israel. He said that Israel is not a South Africa style apartheid state because
Israel is a democratic state. The implication being that South Africa was not
calling itself a democratic state. It is clear that Julian Michanie was not yet
around, or not old enough when apartheid South Africa looked and behaved like
today's Israel. The only difference is that White South Africa did not have a
lobby in America protecting it when it misbehaved the way that Israel is
protected even when it does what it does in-your-face, in the open and brags
about it.
Had Michanie known about South
Africa's claims, he would have understood why democracy did not become a dirty
word in the era of apartheid South Africa, and became one in the era of
colonial Israel. So, my advice to young Julian is that he needs to read up on
the subjects he writes about, and not rely on what is echoed by the mob of
pundits, which is more a lobby group than it is a group of journalists.
There too, I can say that had
Julian Michanie been reading this blog, he would not have held the Farhud
incident as an example of anti-Jewish pogrom. That debate ended by exposing the
reality that Farhud, to which the Jews returned, was a shiny example of Arab
magnanimity appreciated by the Iraqi Jews.
For Michanie to mistake that
incident for something it is not, shows the bankruptcy of the Jewish method of
repeating someone else's echo, thus mutilate history a little more with each
iteration. And yet, this is the method used by the Jewish leaders to force-feed
the young generations of Jewish activists with lies packaged as religious dogma
from which they cannot deviate.
The young take it from there,
and go on to make such a mess of the causes they advocate, the more they try to
embellish their stories, the more their fabrications look ugly and repelling.
Normal human beings have been sensing the ugliness of that process, and have let the Jews know it. The latter never heeded the warning and pushed their luck to the breaking point. When this happened, the Jews called it proof that humanity is defective, and tried their luck again and again and again.