Irina Tsukerman says she is a human rights lawyer and a geopolitical and security analyst. She says she is also the CEO of Scarab Rising, a media and security consultancy. If that’s not enough to impress you, she says she is also the editor-in-chief of The Washington Outsider.
The problem with Irina Tsukerman is that she is also dumb. She
proved it on February 22, 2022 when she wrote a slanderous article in which she
ascribed dark motives to President Joe Biden based of the speech he gave to
announce that Russia had invaded Ukraine.
What Irina Tsukerman did in her article, was make predictions, all
of which turned out to be wrong as proven a few days later. You can verify all
of that yourself when you read the article she wrote under the title: “Biden’s
cynical ploy to return to Iran deal because of Ukraine,” published on February
22, 2022 in The New York Post.
What Tsukerman should have done before sending the article for
publication, was leave it for an hour or two and then read it pretending that
it was written by someone else. She should have tried to analyze both the
article and the person that wrote it. If she has any level of intelligence, she
would have realized to her horror that she was morbidly obsessed with the
subject of Iran.
With a judgment that’s clouded by her obsession, she sat down to listen
to President Biden’s speech while fantasizing that by some miraculous turn of the
events, the President will say something like this: Anything the Russians can
do, we Americans can do more intensely. Let them destroy Ukraine in two or
three days, and we’ll destroy Iran in a day or less.
But this is not what the woman heard, which is why she got filled with
uncontrolled fury as evidenced by the article she wrote. What she revealed at
the start of her article, is that she cannot divorce herself from the idea that
Jews are a breed apart. Had she been able to think of Jews as ordinary human
beings, she would have loved the speech, and would have gone on to do something
better than write a dumb article. Here, in condensed form, is how she prefaced that
ill-advised article:
“Biden’s speech announcing Russia’s invasion of
Ukraine and declaring a set of sanctions against Russia’s elites is a
typical statement attacking a ruthless hegemonic dictator. But it misses the
forest for the trees, enabling the strategies of Russia and Iran. The key point
missing is that Russia does not accept Ukraine as a state. Dmitry Medvedev’s
rhetoric describing Ukraine as a colony with a puppet regime, shows that
Putin’s plans go far beyond annexation of swaths of territory. He has been
trying to avoid a major conflagration, getting to the end result by removing
the legitimate government. He’s selling his actions as reclamation of Russian
territory; therefore, any sanctions will be viewed as illegitimate efforts to
prevent Russia from securing its own territory”.
Believing that monopoly is the exclusive right of the Jews, Irina
Tsukerman could not stomach the idea of what she calls the “missing key point” being
borrowed by Russia, which is what Russia apparently did to build a case on it.
But what is that key point, anyway? It is that Russia does not accept Ukraine
as a state. This is a trick that started as a Jewish invention, and has served
Israel well.
Here is what it’s all about: The Jews invented the idea that since
Palestine was under British occupation, it was not a sovereign country, and this
condition gave the armed marauding Jews the right to steal the country from its
Palestinian owners. When Russia pulled that same trick on Ukraine, it infringed
on the exclusive right of the Jews to monopolize the trick they invented … a
reason to inflame them.
In addition to infringing on that Jewish right, Tsukerman sees something
else that’s equally as upsetting in what Russia did. In the same way that Israel
began annexing Palestinian lands with a first step that opened the door to a
creeping annexation, she foresees that Putin will go beyond the annexation of
swaths of territory. She foresees that Putin’s plans will allow him to endlessly
make new demands.
Having spewed what makes her the paranoid character that she is, Irina
Tsukerman finally came to what she says brings her
to Biden’s other foreign policy failure, the Iran deal.
Well, my friend, if you ever wondered what happens to a paranoid that
gets afflicted with a dose of delusion, read the last four paragraphs of Irina
Tsukerman’s article. Together, they make up 136 words. But for the sake of
brevity, here is a condensed version of them:
“The Ukraine invasion directly benefits the Islamic
Republic. That’s why we are hearing that a deal with Iran is close to being
signed. Biden has alluded to securing cheap Iranian oil as an answer to high
gas prices in the United States. He is cynically using Russia’s destabilization
of the global energy market to argue for the return to appeasement for the
ayatollahs. Ukraine was sacrificed in exchange for a lucrative energy deal and
Iran’s cooperation in Vienna”.
So now you know what it takes to be a sheer lunatic in America: You must be a human rights lawyer, a geopolitical and security analyst, the CEO of a media and security consultancy, and the editor-in-chief of a pamphlet. Anyone interested?