First, I must reveal that I find haggling to be distasteful. And so, every time I become aware that a subject which may interest me, is heavy on haggling, I avoid it unless the content is too important to neglect.
Well, neglecting the subject is what I did when a
controversy erupted about what Whoopi Goldberg had said. I did not follow the
subject, but the subject was so ubiquitous, I could not avoid being exposed to
bits and pieces of it. So, take this as an admission that I do not know all of
what relates to this subject.
What I know about the matter is that during a discussion,
someone said that the Holocaust was about race, and Whoopi Goldberg said, no it
was not. I was tempted at the time to enter the fray despite the haggling that
surrounded the subject, but considering that other matters were more pressing,
I kept my distance from the Goldberg controversy, and used my time and energy to
do other things.
And then, it happened that a few days later, while
surfing the headlines of the newspapers, my eyes caught one that promised the
article below it will interest me enough to want to write about. This was the
news item that came under the title: “AOC says anti-Israel pundit Marc Lamont
Hill victim of cancel culture,” written by Kate Scanlon, and published on
February 15, 2022 in The Washington Examiner.
As I was reading the article, my mind connected elements
of it with the bits and pieces that I had gathered from the Whoopi Goldberg
haggling. By the time I had finished reading the Kate Scanlon article, I knew
what I was going to write about. Here is the part that intrigued me the most in
the Scanlon article:
“Marc
Lamont Hill was fired from CNN in 2018 following comments he made about Israel
and the Palestinian territories during a speech at the United Nations, calling
for a ‘free Palestine from the river to the sea.’ That phrase is used by
terrorist groups, including Hamas, that have called for the elimination of
Israel. The comments were called antisemitic by the Anti-Defamation League”.
Apparently, the Jewish organization that goes by the name
‘Anti-Defamation League’ (ADL) did not just blow its entrails out of the belly
upon hearing an innocuous phrase uttered by a likeable professor, the ADL
accused the good professor of being antisemitic because he uttered a phrase that,
according to ADL, sounds similar to what the so-called terrorists utter at
times. But who was it that decreed this rule? It was none other than the mother
of all terrorist syndicates; the one that calls itself Israel.
And that is the point where the connection was made in my
mind between the Marc Hill incident and the Whoopi Goldberg incident. It is
that the professor was vilified for believing that the Palestinian people
should live in freedom, whereas Whoopi Goldberg was vilified for believing that
Hitler was wrong, and that his “Angel of Death” Josef Mengele was a very
ignorant medical doctor.
Here, my friend —
to the Jews and to the Palestinians — is what goes into the saying that Palestine should be free
from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea:
The Jews believe that the piece of real estate known as
the West Bank belongs to them and will be annexed piece by piece so as to make
Israel a continuous piece that extends from the Jordan River to the
Mediterranean Sea, and no Palestinian state of any size will ever exist. But for
now, they will tolerate the Palestinians speaking of freeing the West Bank,
even if Israel has no intention of relinquishing it.
And so, whenever someone, like Professor Hill, speaks of
a free Palestine from the River to the Sea — which means from end to end — the fanatic Jews get goosebumps because to them, it means
there will not be a Zionist state; not even within the 1948 or 1967 boundaries.
As to the Palestinians, they say that if the Jews will
not let them have their own country in the West Bank and Gaza, then they should
allow for both “peoples” to share a single country. It will be one that extends
from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. It will be a country in which
everyone will have equal rights and equal obligations. And this is what the
slogan: “Palestine shall be free from the River to the Sea,” means to them and to
those who sympathize with their cause, such as Professor Hill.
Now, for the Jews to transport their diseased mentality
to America and use it to cancel good people like Marc Lamont Hill, is to commit
the same kind of horror that they made when they accused Whoopi Goldberg of
whatever it was that they accused her of.
But why is it that the Jews reacted violently when Goldberg
said something they should have embraced? It is that she repudiated what Hitler
said and what Mengele approved of, namely that all Jews are of one and the same
inferior race. No, Whoopi Goldberg meant to say, the Jews are as diversified as
any religion, and if they are inferior, all of humanity is inferior. But
because this is false, it follows that the Jews are the same as everyone else.
What’s wrong with that, you ask? The answer is that there
is nothing wrong with it if you’re a normal human being hearing it. But
everything is wrong with it if you’re a convert to Judaism, the religious
ideology that lives on charity spurred by the victimhood status in which it exists
like fish in the ocean of perpetual begging for charity and compensation.