After going round and round and round, the errand Jew has
finally returned to the starting point where he may have always belonged in the
first place. From the totalitarian money lending Pharisee in the temples of Palestine,
he went on to become the unwelcome Merchant of Venice in Europe to the
worldwide poster child for victimhood, and claimant of compensation now
squatting in occupied Palestine to the obnoxiously parasitic mogul feeding off
the flesh and blood of occupied America.
He, at last, made the trip to Beijing , home of the other Marxist moguls
where the ideas of Karl Marx the Jew easily blend with the principles of the
Kibbutz-like communal living that still attests to the Jewish Leftist
tendencies. It so happened that Mahmoud Abbas who is the President of
Palestine, and Benjamin Netanyahu that is the Prime Minister of Israel were
summoned to China for talks with the leaders of that rising superpower.
You will get a sense of all this and more when you read the
article written by Michael Auslin in the Wall Street Journal of May 16, 2013.
It comes under the title: “From Beijing to Jerusalem ” and the subtitle: “Xi Jinping's plan for peace
in Israel is another sign of
global Chinese ambitions – and waning U.S. influence.” You will find that
the author is more interested in inflating the importance of Israel and
Netanyahu than he is at describing the existing reality. But if you can cut
through the fog of propaganda, you'll be able to pick out a few nuggets.
Whichever way the events will unfold from this point on;
whichever way history will be written from this moment on, the one thing we can
be certain of is that China 's
influence will steadily grow in the world at the same time as America 's
influence will gradually wane. As inevitably as night follows daylight, such
outcome will take place because no Netanyahu or someone like him will ever be
allowed to do to China what
he and the other Jews have done to America .
In consequence of all that, you will never see Chinese
members of Congress do what their counterparts do in America which is to bite each other
in the back for the privilege of genuflecting in front of this Netanyahu or
another one, and praise him for the speech he gave in the hall of the Congress.
This would be a speech that is said to be worth as much as 29 standing ovations
given by hundreds of monkeys lobotomized to think of the Jews as gods worthy of
trumpet, worship and applause. There will still be plenty of this sort of thing
going on in America , and
there will be none in China .
As a result America will
keep sinking and China
will keep rising.
You can see why something like this happened to America when
you read Greg Lukianoff's article in the May 17, 2013 edition of the Wall
Street Journal. It has the title: “Feds to Students: You Can't Say That” and
the subtitle: “The Justice and Education departments issue a dangerous new
speech code for colleges.” The author, who is president of the Foundation for
Individuals Rights in Education, takes up a debate that has gone on and off for
two decades now but whose roots go further back several more decades. He is, in
this piece, discussing specific incidents I am not familiar with, therefore
shall not take up myself. What I wish to do, however, is shed some light on the
history that brought us to this point, and draw the appropriate conclusions.
What happened half a century ago was that some Jewish
organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League said it was time to “educate”
the public on Jewish sensitivities because they were violated by people who did
not follow the politically correct protocols while addressing issues of
importance to the Jews. The way they did the education was to sue people left
and right, forcing many to go on television and pour tears down their cheeks,
apologizing for being as insensitive as to say, for example, that Shakespeare's
Merchant of Venice is a good stage play because Shylock depicts the Jewish
character with such realism.
What the Jews knew then and were counting on – having had
centuries of experience in such matters – was something we know now as the
“chill effect.” That is, when enough people come out and do acts of contrition
in public, a critical mass is reached in the spirit of the public that forever
compels the individuals in it to feel a chill run down their spines when
thinking of something that may be associated even remotely with a Jewish issue.
Thus, people become paralyzed and they abandon the subject, leaving the field
entirely for the Jews to do what they want.
When things had reached that point, and the Jews felt secure
in the knowledge that no one will dare take them on, they opened up with heavy
artillery against everyone they chose to be enemy of the day. Thus, while no
one could or would say something like: “those Jews have gone too far,” the Jews
were saying with impunity things like: those Arab mad dogs, those Arab sick
dogs or what have you. And they ran cartoons that depicted the Arabs as bugs
running for their lives while a hand bearing the Star of David was spraying
them with chemicals. They called this not hate speech but the exercise of free
speech that the Arabs knew nothing about.
Effectively chilled, no one opened their mouth to object. No
one that is, except some tenured professors in a number of colleges and
universities where they could no longer stand the double standard that allowed
the Jewish dagger to be planted in the heart of America 's
constitution and America 's
ideals. These were the ideals that liberated the Jews from a Nazi regime that
used to burn the books it did not like the same way that the Jews were now
burning not only books but also the career and dignity of every honorable
person who committed the crime of appreciating a play by William Shakespeare or
committed such infractions as criticize the Israeli apartheid regime or the
bombing of women and children in their bedrooms using American weapons.
This is when the Jewish “heavy duty” lawyers such as Alan
Dershowitz came out with guns blazing, demanding that those professors be fired
if not tenured, or that they be put on a watch list if tenured. Of course, they
were hoping to extend the chill effect to the colleges and universities, but
they failed because the professors were exercising the right to articulate
political speech. This is protected by the Constitution and is available to
everyone. In fact, the Jews have written and are still writing thousands of
books and tens of thousands of articles criticizing the politics of everyone
who does not toe the Zionist line. They get paid for that, and no one is
demanding that they be fired from whatever position they occupy.
But the evildoers were never happy, so they responded by
attacking the symbols of Muslim religion to establish a kind of equivalence
between this kind of attacks and the political speeches of the good professors.
When this did not gain traction, they threw everything into the pot, including
hate speech and sexual harassment to accomplish one thing and one thing only –
to silence everyone while allowing the Jews to say anything they want.