Just look at this: “Putting this message into practice will
require much sharper, clearer public responses by the White House and State
Department to violations of basic democratic and rule-of-law norms.” What do
you think this is about? It's another unsolicited advice to the American
government as to the best way to tell the world that America
is still run not by elected Americans but the unelected leaders of AIPAC and
the Tel Aviv/New York
(TANY) axis of hate, incitement and disinformation.
The quote is from an article written by Thomas Carothres and
Nathan J. Brown under the title: “Recalibrating U.S.
policy in Egypt ”
published in the Washington Post on May 3, 2013. It fits the current AIPAC-TANY
axis policy of planting make-believe journalists at conferences where an
official of the American government would be standing to fill the media on the
state of legitimate concerns. Instead of pursuing legitimate news, however, the
plants interrupt the flow of information by cornering the official and getting
him or her to say something that send a PUBLIC message to the world informing
it who is in charge of what used to be superpower America.
With this in mind, what do Carothers and Brown talk about in
the article? This is a good question because they have adopted an approach that
is smarter than their predecessors. Unlike what those guys were doing over the
past two years, our authors avoided writing an article that could have made
them look like bulls in a China
shop. Instead, they started with a conciliatory tone and gradually built up to
the inevitable call that the elected leaders of Egypt
do what the elected leaders of America
do. It would be to serve not the people that elected them but the Jews of
Israel and everywhere else in the world who did not elect them. And when this
will be done, call the whole exercise a perfect example of democratic
performance.
Thus, after the pleasantries, Carothers and Brown switched
gear with this: “Yet, in the past five months, Egyptian politics has taken a
seriously troubling turn.” They went on to describe a situation that may not be
very pleasant but that is not much worse than to say, for example, they saw
people wear brown shoes on a Wednesday in Cairo .
Well, I assure the two “thinkers” of whatever tank they come from, that many in
this world, including some American cities, would trade their troubles for
those of Egypt .
The authors of the article then do something that makes you
change your mind about them being smarter than their predecessors. They give
examples of what the government of Egypt is doing wrong. This is what
they list: “Examples include rushing through a new constitution and appointing
a new prosecutor general … Supporters have gone to court to harass their
critics.” Hey, guys. This is what you do when you follow the rule-of-law. You
cannot at the same time accuse the government of not following the rule of law,
and chide it because it does. Writing this kind of nonsense makes you sound not
like the solid thinkers of a think tank but the solid substance of a septic
tank. You stink.
They already sound almost as bad as their predecessors and,
worse, they don't stop here. They come even closer by taking up the subject of Egypt 's
finances. They do, however, avoid sounding like the in-your-face assholes that
their predecessors have sounded like. Instead of barking: “Pressure the IMF and
the allies to deny Egypt the financing it may need,” they say this: “The Obama
administration is commendably trying to help Egypt … yet Obama officials are
clinging to their narrative in which the [government] is well-intentioned, even
if inexperienced and sometimes heavy-handed.” A softer new approach but just as
stinky as the old.
All in all, what Thomas Carothers and Nathan Brown have done
is speak softly to better succeed at convincing the Obama administration to
publicly bark at Egypt
as loudly, sharply and clearly as it can.
They want this to happen not because they want Egypt to hear whatever message there is, but
because they want the world to hear a message to the effect that America is
still controlled by the Jews.
That's the bottom line. That is the intent of the article.