If you ever thought that the Jews would drop demands they
made when events prove they were wrong making those demands in the first place,
perish the thought. Here we have hundreds of thousands who died, and millions
more who were displaced, yet the Jews continue to demand that the situation in Syria be
continued as is because what matters to them is that the regime in that country
be changed. This is the course they command America to continue pursuing even
if millions more must die or be displaced.
The Jewish leaders in charge of that operation deputized the
editors of the Wall Street Journal to relay their order to America's high
command, and the Journal did just that in a piece they wrote under the title:
“Obama's 'Dangerous Currents'” and the subtitle: “Putin and Iran corner the
U.S. on Syria, as world disorder spreads.” They published the piece in the
Journal on September 29, 2015.
The occasion that brought about those events is a world that
has had enough watching the Judeo-American game of decapitating the Arab and
Muslim governments in the region for the benefit of Israel ,
and decided to do something to end the butchery that's unfolding in the Levant,
and spilling into Europe . The decision was
announced to the General Assembly of the United Nations by Russia and Iran ,
countries that came together to carry out a peace plan for Syria . They
invited the Americans to join them in the effort, and when President Obama
gestured his initial acceptance of the plan, the Wall Street Journal blasted
him.
To make their point, the editors rely on two well known
Jewish tricks. The first is to say they know of something that someone
whispered in their ear because that someone doesn't want to say it loudly. The
way they expressed the trick this time is through the use of the Latin
expression “sotto voce” which they employed at the start of their piece. The
second trick they used is to make a list of what someone (this time President
Obama) said sometime ago which may be at variance with what he is saying now,
thus deduce that he must be wrong in seeking peace, and they must be right in
demanding that the butchery be continued.
Furthermore, whereas in his address to the General Assembly,
President Obama made a reference to Russia's involvement in Ukraine with these
words: “we see some major powers assert themselves in ways that contravene
international law,” the editors of the Journal dishonestly made it sound like
he was talking about Russia's plan to bring peace to Syria. The way they pulled
this sleight of hand is to begin the next paragraph like so: “Nowhere is that
clearer now than in Syria .”
This is so very dishonest, it can only be Jewish through and through.
What is galling the editors and their Jewish masters is that
Russia and Iran worked out a peace plan for the region
instead of joining the demonic plan that Israel ,
World Jewry and America
have been implementing for five years now. This is how the editors express
their dismay: “Far from cooperating with the U.S.-led Syria strategy, Mr. Putin and Iran are moving to replace the U.S. coalition
and strategy with their own.”
And they explain why they are dismayed: “Mr. Putin will
introduce a resolution at the Security Council calling for a coalition against
the Islamic State in Syria .
This means supporting [the] regime in Damascus
against … those trained and armed by the U.S. … This follows the news that Iraq will share intelligence with Russia , Syria
and Iran .”
And the editors go on to speculate in a fashion that is Jewish to the core:
“The Putin-Tehran goal is to build an arc of influence that extends from
Western Afghanistan to the Eastern Mediterranean … the goal is to isolate Israel .” They
speculate because they want you to believe they know what goes on in the hearts
of people.
And so they whine: “The White House is doing little more
than protest. Mr. Obama told the U.N. 'there cannot be … a return to the prewar
status quo in Syria
… realism requires a managed transition away from Assad.'” They whine because:
“How is Mr. Obama going to achieve that result? Putin is establishing facts on
the ground each day.” And this is happening; they say “while Mr. Obama is
harrumphing … Even if the U.S.
vetoes Putin's resolution, Mr. Obama is likely to accept the survival of Mr.
Assad.”