The Jewish propaganda machine came up with a new quip in
fulfillment of the Jewish never ending quest to make humanity accept the notion
it is screwed up because it refuses to recognize the Jews as having special privileges
which give them one hundred percent right to everything that exists, and zero
percent obligation to anything. The quip boils down to four simple words:
antisemitism is a derangement.
And while the Jews believe that every human being that does
not convert to the Judaic movement – which they say rises to the level of a
religious belief – remains a deranged person by genetic disposition, the human
race has determined long ago that to embrace a belief does not change the
genetic make-up of people, but can change their character.
Thus, while it is unlikely that humanity has pogromed and
holocausted the Jews everywhere on the planet and throughout time because it is
deranged and refuses to be cured by converting to Judaism – it is more likely
that converting to Judaism is what turns people into warmongers. When these
people cause the wars that inflict pain and suffering on the innocent, humanity
turns against them to pogrom or holocaust them.
How this never-ending cycle starts, develops and ends, only to
start again, can be understood by studying the article that Michael Makovsky
wrote under the title: “What Next?” published on September 25, 2015 in the
Weekly Standard. It is about the nuclear deal that six nations, including America , have concluded with Iran on behalf
of the world. It is also the deal that the Jews opposed before the negotiations
had started, opposed it during the negotiations, and oppose it now that the
deal has been concluded. Their reason for doing this has been one and only one:
they wanted war, war, war.
And war is what Makovsky is calling for in his article. To
make the point, he walks the path that the Jews have walked since President
Obama was elected to office. That is, they have been teasing the Americans with
the reproach that no one in the world respects them anymore because Obama
abandoned the role of leadership that America used to play, having a
powerful military to back it. Now that the military has gotten weak, the
consequences have been these: “blunders in withdrawing from Iraq, drawing but
not enforcing a red line in Syria, and declaring quasi-war but doing very
little against the Islamic State, the Iran deal was the straw that broke the
camel's back of American credibility.”
This is putting the world in mortal danger, he goes on to
say, which is why something must be done. And so he asks: What is to be done?
How does one begin? And he tells of four considerations that must be included
in a national security policy.
First, he says, don't obsess about sanctions – which proved
ineffective – but make them only a supporting element of a new policy against Iran . Second,
he says, stick to what works which is a credible military threat. To prove this
point, he speculates that Qaddafi of Libya gave up the quest to build a nuclear
arsenal because Saddam Hussein was toppled. He calls this speculation “an
empirical record” yet ignores the actual empirical record of Syria 's Assad not being impressed by America 's red
line. Go figure.
Makovsky goes on to explain his third point. He says he
hopes the next president of the United States
will walk away from the deal and use the military threat to scare Iran . He does
not explain why Iran – that
is as much as a hundred times more powerful than Syria
– would fear an American air attack when Syria was not. Still, he goes on to
the fourth point which is to “boost the military capability of Israel .” And
this is where he calls on the Congress to play a role.
He makes that call because he is about to ask for something
he knows that no American President – even a mentality retarded one – will ever
accept. Since the Congress, which is populated by hundreds of the mentally
retarded, has proven time and again it will go to any extreme if taken there by
a Jew, Makovsky asks that B-52 bombers and bunker busting bombs be given to Israel .
And so he ends his presentation like this: “When we have an
American leader willing to prevent a nuclear Iran , that president must have the
tools – as must the Israelis – to do the job.”