It happens often that when foreigners listen to grown men
and women in America, even highly educated ones talking about their adherence
to American or Western values, the foreigners feel like cracking a laughter;
maybe even shed a few tears of sorrow and pity for the Americans.
That's because the discussion invariably takes the sort of
turn that leads the Americans to say to each other and to the world they are an
exceptional people because they love freedom whereas their opponents hate
freedom. Having thus placed themselves in a separate category, which may at
times include other Western nations but no one else, it never occurs to those
Americans that there is more to a system of values than one's declared love for
freedom – whether what they are living is real freedom or a mirage. These
Americans simply do not know that an important component of the value system is
how people treat each other and how they deal with foreigners.
To put it simply, when things are normal and no one is
carrying baggage or holding grudges, an Oriental who encounters someone for the
first time, will extend to that person the respect as well as the benefit of
the doubt, both of which are normally extended to a revered member of the
family. In contrast, a Westerner will react with fear and a sense of foreboding
when he encounters someone for the first time.
What happens after that – which will define the long term
relationship between the two – will depend on the character of the individuals
involved. But the signature of what is Oriental or what is Western will not be
erased entirely even as the relationship evolves and alters through time.
The question now is this: What happens when the Orient and
the West meet? The answer is that the Orient will, at first, trust the West.
The West will then betray the Orient, and will seek to exploit it. This will
cause the East to turn angry and fight back till it regains control over its
own destiny by damaging the West or annihilating it if the latter keeps trying
to subdue the Orient. This, in fact, has been the story of China and the
West.
Another question is this: Can the lessons that were learned
from dealing with China
since the visit to that country that was paid by President Nixon – be applied
to North Korea ?
The answer is probably not for two reasons. They are that America has changed, and the North Koreans have
learned a great deal about the old America
and the new America .
What has changed about America
is that it was contaminated by the Jewish culture in a way that can only be
called a move toward the abyss.
What tells you there had been a Jewish hand in a given
witches' brew is the tendency to place people into separate compartments, not
only things or events. Such people would not necessarily be segregated
according to skin color or to beliefs; they would be according to the dictum: “who
is with us and who is against us”. However, if an entire group that can be
identified by a skin color or a religious belief proves to be with them or
against them, the tendency to segregate will apply to the group.
The interplay between all those notions comes out in the Wall
Street Journal editorial which came under the title: “North Korea 's Nuclear Gambit” and the subtitle:
“Is Kim Jong Un angling for his own version of Iran 's nuclear deal?” It was
published on September 16, 2015. Whereas an Oriental may not try to extract a
lesson from the way that America
has treated another country, North Korea
did just that with regard to the Iran nuclear deal, according to the
reports upon which the Journal editors wrote their piece.
The worry here is that the Jewish tendency to move toward
the abyss seems to take hold in this undertaking. Thus, instead of scoring a
success, the Americans may score a failure. Here is what may well happen:
Responding to the expressed need of the North Koreans to feel safe in their
country, the Obama administration will try to negotiate a deal that will be
beneficial to them and to the world.
In the meantime, influential pundits driven by the Jewish
penchant for the abyss will see Iran
and North Korea
as two characters from the compartment labeled 'against us.' Those pundits will
argue that the Koreans cannot be trusted, and will recommend that they be
dealt with harshly. The result will be that a number of the brainless and the
uninformed in Congress will follow the recommendation and scuttle any deal that
the current administration or the next one will have negotiated with the North
Koreans.
The Journal editorial provides a glimpse of the arguments
that the pundits will put out. Here is one: “If a deal is reached. Kim knows
that he can then violate it at will without paying too steep a price.”