Not every animal is a horse to which you can whisper; some
animals are strange looking, and some even look like familiar figures, yet they
think and behave as if they did not evolve beyond the level of the jackass.
What these things do to earn their keep is that they wait
for a demonic character to come whisper into their ear what sort of sound they
must emit today if they want to be fed at the hand of the demon whose mouth has
whispered instructions in their ear.
And you can see what sort of instructions these animals get
when you read the New York Times editorial which came under the title: “What
Went Wrong in Egypt ?”
published on September 17, 2015. What these things are purported to be
discussing is a case of what has come to be called “friendly fire” in which a
military that's in charge of an operation mistakenly fires on a military or a
civilian unit that is not the enemy.
Unfortunately, this sort of thing happens all the time, and
no one is associated with this sort of mistakes more than the American military
… notorious for killing as many friends of their own military, of allied
military and of civilians – as they kill of enemy combatants. This is not to
mention the Israelis who purposefully commit acts of friendly fires (by
mistake) in their genocidal attempt to wipe out the Palestinian children whom
they fear will someday outnumber the Jewish population in occupied Palestine.
What helps in the detection of the Jewish demonic influence
that is brought to bear on America's editorial writers, is the sense of
celebration that the less-than-human creatures manifest at the tragedies which
occur from time to time in an Arab or a Muslim country, especially in Egypt
about whom the Jews have developed a biblical size hatred since the time of
Moses.
And that is the influence you detect in the current
editorial of the New York Times. The animals who brayed it begin it like this:
“The world got an alarming look at Egypt 's bumbling war against
extremism after a military helicopter attacked a convoy of tourists, including
Mexican visitors.” There are three Judeo-demonic strains you will not fail to
detect in this sentence. They are:
(1) Their use of the word “alarming” is to tell the readers
this is something that's so big, it should have serious consequences for Egypt . (2)
Their use of the characterization “bumbling” is what tells you they are
celebrating. (3) The reason they are celebrating is that the victims were
tourists about whom the jackasses later say the following: “The attack is a
tragedy for Egypt
which has been struggling to win back the vital tourist trade.”
What you've seen so far is the emotional response that
animals are conditioned to display when so ordered by their trainer. In
addition to that, there is the evil genius that's the unmistakable signature of
demonic Judaism. It is unmistakable because it is the sort of deliberate
mistake that only the Jews commit. The act is designed in a way they can deny
responsibility for it if and when detected by simply saying it was an
inadvertent error.
Here is that moment: “The tourists' convoy was three hours
southwest of Cairo in the White Desert Egypt . But it rings the bell among
those who know that geography. They know that “southwest of Cairo ”
means the accident happened in the Western
Desert White Desert ,”
which is something that does not exist in Egypt or anywhere.
Ask them, and they'll say this was an inadvertent mistake.
No it was not. If not, how could it be of use to them? Here is the answer to
that question: “Were security forces acting on intelligence from America and Israel ? If so, was it faulty or did
the Egyptians misinterpret it?”
The fact is that if there is intelligence sharing between Egypt and America
or Israel , it would be in
the Sinai, which is far from the Western
Desert