It is a truism to say that the way something appears to the
naked eye depends on the features which are proper to the thing; also on the
place where you stand from which you look at it. This reality applies to objects
that occupy a physical space; also applies to ideas that exist inside the human
mind.
For example, if you are an American of the Progressive
Liberal stripe, you view abortion as the act which gives women the right to
choose. But if you are an American Conservative ideologue, you view abortion as
the act which takes the life of a helpless child unable to defend itself. To be
sure, there is no dispute in that the physical operation of aborting a fetus
looks the same to both sets of eyes, but the perception as to what such
operation means, is what separates one beholder from the other.
In the situations where perception does not matter, the way
that an act is perceived has little or no consequence. However, in the
situations where perception motivates people to take action, huge consequences
can follow. This would be the case in the political arena where ideas are
generated, where they are perceived differently by different people, and where
they are acted upon according to the way that each perceives the thing; a
reality that often means they will act at cross purposes to each other.
Think of the situation in North Korea . Imagine you are a
young Korean aspiring to join the ruling elite. You look at the different
factions as they jockey to be in the right place from where to move up the
ladder while avoiding the possibility of landing in front of a firing squad for
something you did or something you neglected to do. To you, the situation on
the ground is all that matters because it is more real to your mind's eye than
anything else in the universe. But if you are a non-Korean, and you stand
outside the country looking at the situation from the proverbial 30,000 feet
up, the minutia of what's going on below, means nothing to you because what you
see is an overall dysfunctional system that's impaired because it is based on
the Communist ideology.
Well, the same method of measuring the effectiveness of a
system of governance, applies to the situation in America as well. Whereas the people
who live in that country are totally absorbed by the various factions operating
on the political stage, and seeing nothing else on earth or in the universe as
a result, the rest of the world looks at America from 30,000 feet up, and sees
something very serious if not very disturbing. It sees an overall dysfunctional
system that's impaired because it is based on the Liberal Democratic ideology.
Jonah Goldberg is a member of a faction called Jews of the
Neo-Conservative (Neocon) stripe whether or not he admits it. This faction is
opposed to the Progressive Liberal group that's headed by the current President
of the Republic, Barack Obama. Most of Goldberg's writing follows the Neocon
line, which consists of relentless attacks on the President for what he does
and what he chooses not to do. The latest column written by Goldberg affirms
this reality in that it came under the title: “Syria : Just One of Obama's
Foreign-Policy Failures,” published on September 18, 2015 in National Review
Online.
Look at any place in the world, look at America before
the Jewish domination of its media, and you'll find that attacks heaped on the
administration with such relentless ferocity, happened only when the chief
executive was caught red-handed in a scandal of “Watergate” size and caliber.
So you go over the Goldberg article once again to see if he is alleging
something that comes close to that level of outrage … but find nothing of the
sort.
What you find instead is that the Pentagon – now as always –
is spending lots of money and delivering little. It is also expressing itself
in a funny language that used to be called Pentagon-speak, now called “word
salad.” As to the intelligence community, someone has alleged (no proof yet)
that it is putting out inaccurate reports. The description of these inaccuracies
remain nebulous and ill-defined, but are nothing of the “WMD in Iraq ” magnitude
or consequence.
As to the sins – however minor they may be, and certainly
not scandalous – committed by the President, Goldberg says that he misjudged
the strength of the enemy, calling it jayvee squad when it is more than that.
There is also the irony of him writing about a nuclear-free world while a
student, an event that contrasts with the Neocon predictions that Iran will build
a bomb and will be emulated by its neighbors. But given that the Jews always
say they can predict the future only to be proven wrong when the future comes,
their latest predictions do not pass the laughing test. So guess what, my
friend, those so-called sins can't even be classified as sins.
Goldberg ends the article saying something about the
President giving a speech at the site of the Berlin Wall, only to be confronted
by Europeans building walls to keep refugees out, and by Americans who
increasingly cherish the idea of building walls. What exactly the author means
to convey by that, remains obscure.
What is becoming less obscure as time passes, is that the
influence of the Jews on America
has been the single most effective agent at eroding the system of Liberal
Democracy in the country. These people are using the freedom that comes with
democracy to stifle the democratic right of others, thus monopolize the
governance of the ship of state.
They are doing it by heaping a Niagara of criticism on
anything and everything that does not serve their purpose, and they are
throwing an avalanche of anti-Semitic accusations at those who dare to ask just
how many of them can there be in the country.