One day you hear them scream their heads off: Quick, quick
Mr. President, go ahead and bomb Iran
because the mullahs control four Arab countries, one of them being Yemen .
The next day you hear them scream: Morality, morality, what kind of country
have we become accusing Iran
of interfering in the internal affairs of Yemen when clearly the mullahs are
the saints they say they are?
That's what American conservatism has been reduced to since
the day when Jewish Liberals that turned coat, infiltrated it and took it over
under the newly acquired name of Neoconservative or Neocon. But why did Jewish
Liberals turn coat and display the conservative stripes in the first place?
They did because Judaism is by nature a hierarchical and authoritarian
Stone-Age kind of system. It will temporarily espouse liberal ideals to achieve
a sought after goal but then return to its conservative roots once the goal has
been achieved.
This is the scenario that played itself out in America , except
that when all was said and done, the Jewish scheme did not work as well as
expected. What is apparent at this time is that the Jews find themselves
bathing in a swamp of moral disarray, unable to maintain a cohesive discourse
that would convince a skeptical audience it is true the Earth is not flat or
that the sun sets in the West because it rises in the East.
Look around the Globe and you'll find that no matter how
liberal a society is, it will always have a conservative side that will kick-in
and ask questions about an alien entity that wishes to mix with it. Because the
Jews have always moved from one society to another––trying to mix with this one
today and that one tomorrow––they found the human habit of inquiry to be
annoying. To respond, they developed arguments that preach the virtues of
liberalism, and used them to soften every new society they began to infiltrate.
Once deep in the society, and in control of the strategic institutions upon
which it rested, the Jews turned back their coats to display their Stone-Age
conservative origin.
That's where the Jews find themselves in America at this
time. It's not a new place for them, having been at this point in other
societies. But the difference this time is that they collided against an attitude
they did not see elsewhere. It is that the American population is made of
immigrants who left everything behind to adopt a new way of life. The Jews
discovered that the “new” does not scare the Americans. In fact, far from being
a monolithic group that viscerally rejects the other, the Americans did not
reject the Jewish newcomers the way that other societies rejected them.
Instead, the Americans displayed an attitude that came down to this: If you
have something better than what I have, let me see it, and I'll adopt it …
otherwise get out of here because I'm busy doing something important.
Once integrated in that society and in command of its
strategic institutions, the Jews worked to narrow the entry gate on other
groups coming into the country. They did it out of fear that another group may
come equipped with the means to replicate what they did, push them out of the
way, and replace them at the helm of America 's institutions. Thus, the
Jews turned conservative and tried to use conservative principles to advance
this part of their agenda. They developed several techniques to do so, the most
important being to isolate America
from the rest of the world – not economically – but at the level of human to
human contact.
This is what you'll sense when reading the article that came
under the title: “Aligning with Saudi
Arabia 's designs,” written by Robert W.
Merry who is editor of the American Conservative. The article was published on
November 30, 2017 in the Washington Times.
Speaking of America 's
support for Saudi Arabia
in the Yemeni war, Robert Merry makes the following points:
“The Saudis say Iran is meddling in that war. This
is an exaggeration, as Iranian involvement in Yemen is limited … for America
this is a moral question … The atrocity is the Saudi blockade, imposed on
incoming goods via land, sea and air … America needs to debate this matter”.
This sounds great. It is something that must be said about
the Yemeni war and all wars. But coming out the mouth of a Neocon, it sounds
hollow as would be the voice of Doctor Josef Mengele pleading with the world to have a marathon in which
money will be collected to build a luxury resort where all Holocaust survivors
shall live free of charge in comfort and dignity.
After all, it was the Neocons that justified the blockade of
Iraq
in which children starved to death. It is the Neocons that continue to justify
the blockade of Gaza where conditions are as
bad as in Yemen .
It was the Neocons that belittled the seriousness of harvesting the organs of
Palestinian kids shot dead by Israeli soldiers. It is the Neocons that continue
to celebrate the occasions when Arabs kill Arabs. And it is the conservatives of
America that call for the blockade of North Korea so that the children would
die of starvation and the adults would get invaded by worms in their guts.
No, Robert Merry did not write that article because he was
gripped by a crisis of conscience, or because a sense of morality suddenly
enveloped him. He wrote that article because the word has gone out for dwellers
of the echo chamber to raise their voice and do what they can to stop the human
to human contact developing between America
and an Arab country that has not yet recognized Israel .