Still trying to con the Americans

Flattery will put you on every idyllic road that takes you to hell. This must be the lesson Ehud Barak and a few others have learned over the past few decades. Barak was prime minister of Israel, and has also served as defense minister and chief of general staff for Israel's Defense Forces. His apparent regret should carry weight.

The man expresses that regret in an article he wrote under the title: “We Must Save Israel From Its Government,” published on December 2, 2017 in the New York Times. He cites all kinds of reasons as to what has gone wrong with Israel, and concludes that the current government is solely responsible for all those ills. But the fact is that the current situation is nothing more than the inevitable outcome of what has been going on for decades both in Israel and with the Jews in America and other places around the world.

The Jews flattered every potential donor that could be suckered into contributing something to promote Israel's agenda. They received plenty for their trouble, especially from the Americans who gave financial aid as well as military, legal and diplomatic aid, and everything else you can think of. But like the saying which goes: “give the man a fish and he'll have enough to eat one day, but teach him to fish and he'll have enough to eat every day,” the donors gave enough to maintain Israel afloat for a number of decades till they could give no more. Meanwhile, they neglected to let Israel develop its own means of survival. Now, that it appears all sources of aid will soon dry up, Israel is wondering how it will stay afloat going forward.

What happened is that having no incentive or compulsion to develop a regular economy, Israel relied on the aid it was receiving from abroad to create a make-believe economy based on distributing the foreign aid it was receiving while training its young to study the bible and suppress or kill Palestinians. To be fair, it must be said that the Jews did not kill all the Palestinians because they needed some to work the system of distribution and to build new settlements in the occupied territories. These would be settlements that Jewish American gambling moguls financed to populate with American losers they paid to go suppress or kill Palestinians.

Now that the “Western” world––which had a surplus to donate to the Jews––produces barely enough to satisfy its own people, having to compete against a very productive East, it can no longer send aid to Israel. When in response, Netanyahu went to the Eastern nations trying to con them into replacing the West at maintaining Israel afloat in return for contrived platitudes and hot air, the leaders of the Eastern nations spat in his face, gave him the boot and told him never again to show up at their door.

Yes, Netanyahu is one albatross around Israel's neck, like says Ehud Barak, but he is not the only albatross. The problem with Israel is that it lived from the start with the Jewish obsession of acquiring all of Palestine. Thus, when Barak says: “Solidarity and integrity of the people take priority over the unity of the land –– namely, the wish to possess the entirety of our historic homeland,” he is misleading the readers into believing that the idea of going after all of Palestine started with the Netanyahu government. This is false; the obsession started in 1948 when Israel was allowed to take a finger, and the Jews immediately fantasized about taking the whole arm.

Because Ehud Barak injected that falsehood into his presentation, he was able to avoid describing a workable plan to save Israel from itself – not just save it from its government, like he says. He then closed the door about having an intelligent discussion when he blurted the following about Israel: “it built an 'iron wall' of military and economic power that has made us the strongest player in the region.” This sentence was immediately followed by its contradiction: “This accomplishment, together with bipartisan American support, enables Israel to shape its own future.” Apparently no one told this guy that when he says he is the strongest kid in the neighborhood, he cannot request continued American support no matter how much he could twist the formulation of the request.

But that is the kind of ambiguity the Jews discovered was above the intellectual processing capability of American lawmakers. The Jews took advantage of this situation by injecting the same kind of ambiguity in every conversation they had with the Americans. They confused them with gobbledygook that would make a Third World twelve-year-old crack up in laughter. He would run to his mom and dad, telling them about the tall American who says if your home is invaded by armed goons and you pick up a knife to chase him away, you're a terrorist and the goon is a victim. Well, the kid may have laughed, but the parents wept as they remembered that the American was once tall enough to command their respect. Now they wonder what happened that turned him into such a pathetic clown.