Assembly Line Pundits suffering same Defects

Here is a blunt example demonstrating the consequences of the damage that the Jews have inflicted on America's First Amendment. It is an article that came under the title: “The president just called the world's bluff on Jerusalem,” written by Benny Avni and published on December 6, 2017 in the New York Post.

To come now and examine the consequences of what the Jews have done, is like looking at the wreckage of a serious accident, and not be interested in how or why it happened. What we must do, therefore, before anything else, is recall how America was transformed from being the home of free speech to being the assembly line producing clones of mindless group-thinkers. They are designed to take instructions from a central source on a daily basis and regurgitate them with little or no deviation.

America being a nation of immigrants, it experiences the natural tendency of human beings to vet newcomers before welcoming them into the homestead. That tendency played a major role in the way that relationships were forged and developed in that country. Understandably, it happened that friction flared up from time to time between an established group and a newcomer. In fact, every ethnic and religious group experienced a similar kind of difficult moment before fully integrating into the mainstream of American life.

Except for the Jews, all groups produced someone that wrote a book or did art work chronicling what they went through as newcomers into the country, but then moved on leaving behind a literary or artistic message that described “the way we were.” The work served as catharsis encouraging the group to forgive and forget.

The difference between these people and the Jews is that the latter lived by the rules of a religion which idolizes the kind of hate that bans forgiveness and never forgets. It prompted the Jews to develop a hypersensitive sense of being victimized, a state of mind that continues to obsess them about plugging the sources of their distress. It is why they regard the First Amendment as a dreaded law whose effect they must curtail.

The Jewish leaders developed all kinds of techniques by which to silence those that refuse to deify them. They succeeded so well at imposing their will on America, they managed to monopolize the public square with no one around to push back against anything they say or do. It was inevitable, therefore, that all those who grew up toeing the Jewish line, now look and behave like identical products of an assembly line, and all of them suffering from the same defects.

You see these defects in the Benny Avni article. Start with the title: “The president called the bluff on Jerusalem.” The writer is talking about America––the supposed mediator in the peace talks between the Palestinians and the Jews––suddenly favoring one side regarding the most contentious element in the negotiations. And what does Avni see? He sees a game where the world was pulling a bluff on America, but after 22 years, the president called the bluff, and the world did not explode.

In fact, Avni is not alone displaying this kind of superficiality. Pundits of his ilk confirm it is how they view world events, especially those unfolding in the Middle East. Unable to conceive the existence of a third dimension, their probing of the issues does not go beyond touching the surface. Based on that, the Jewish pundits create scenarios which are no more than a thin representation of the real world.

Because all those equipped to dig deep into the issues were silenced, the Jews feel compelled to argue both sides of every issue so as to give the impression they carry on with a real dialogue. When this happens, the spectacle takes the debate down to the level of a farce as Jews face off against Jews, haggling over what they claim to be opposite viewpoints.

You can see an example of that in the opening words of the Avni article: “The region, we're told, will explode … so brace yourselves for turmoil and violence.” The writer does not say who told him the region will explode because it was his kind of people that did. A real opposite side would be the Arabs, and these people do not behave the way the Jews describe them. The reality is that the Arabs look ahead and speak in terms of what might happen a year, a decade or a generation from now.

In fact, this is what happened when America was preparing to invade Iraq in 2003. The head of the Arab League warned that destroying Iraq will open the gates of hell. America invaded Iraq anyway, and when the gates of hell did not open right away, the Jews shouted: See? We were right and the Arabs were wrong.

Well, the gates of hell have opened in due course, and what we're seeing in the Levant a decade and a half later, qualifies as hellish. Guess what else happened. It took the Russians and the Iranians to clean up the mess that America created; a reality that pushed the prestige of the two countries to heights they could not dream of in 2003. And you can bet there are people in America who consider this development a hellish outcome.

This history would have unfolded differently if the marketplace of ideas were not monopolized by assembly line Jewish pundits, all regurgitating the same defective product.