David French is an American lawyer that's an insult to his
profession and his country. Not only is he out there mingling with normal folks
as if he were one of them, he once contemplated running to be president of the United States .
Had he run and won, think how much damage he would have done to America and the
world.
He wrote an article in which he begins the discussion by
revealing his belief in the theory that says human beings have a defective gene
called anti-Semitism. Here is what you'll find in his opening sentence:
“Confront[ing] the bigoted standards of the international community.” After
elaborating on that, which fills the bulk of the article, French reaches this
conclusion: “That, friends, is textbook anti-Semitism.” Read the whole thing
and judge for yourself. The article came under the title: “Donald Trump Strikes
a Blow against International Anti-Semitism,” published on December 6, 2017 in
National Review Online.
The next thing David French does is reveal that when it
comes to choosing between the national security of the United States and boosting the ego of Israeli
leaders, he would sacrifice America 's
security and serve the emotional needs of Netanyahu and his likes. To
understand this point, it must be said that America
is still the overall superpower, but it is challenged by Russia and China
militarily, and challenged by the European Union and China economically. For now,
America can stand alone if it must, but as time passes, it will need to maintain
its good standing with the rest of the world, or will be crushed by the rising
powers.
Consequently, the crucial commodity America has
that will guarantee its future security, is the goodwill it worked hard to earn
during a good part of the twentieth century. To squander this goodwill now is
to commit a crime against future American generations, and that's what David
French wants to do just to inflate Netanyahu's ego. Here is how he put it:
“Think I'm too enthusiastic about a maneuver, to quote the New York Times
'isolate the U.S. '
and 'draw a storm of criticism from Arab and European leaders'”?
Putting his legal credentials on the line, this pinhead of a
rotting egghead, now turns his attention to the legal argument as to whether or
not Israel has the right to be in Jerusalem given that legally, it is only
entitled to the boundaries of 1948 set by the United Nation Security Council
for a Jewish homeland that does not encompass any part of Jerusalem.
What happened after that date is that the Jews kept stealing
more and more Palestinian land, including the part they call West
Jerusalem . When the war of 1967 happened and the Security Council
passed Resolutions 242 and 338, it said Israel could keep the stolen land
if it negotiated a land swap with the Palestinians. Thus, as of now, Israel does not own West Jerusalem, let alone East Jerusalem which it annexed long after the passage of
those UN resolutions and despite their letter and intent.
Look now what the rotting egghead calling himself David
French says about Israel 's
right to have Jerusalem
as its capital even before the conclusion of negotiations that will determine
the boundaries of the swap. He says Israel has that right because “of the
Jewish people's ancient connection to the city of David … and no conceivable
peace settlement would turn over the seat of Israel's government to
Palestinians … Israel's government sits on Israeli land, and it will remain
Israeli land”.
Well, David French can convert to Judaism if he wants, and
he may develop a spooky kind of connection to the city of David if that will turn him on, but he'll
have no more right to that piece of real estate than Harvey Weinstein has the
right to rape young actresses. And neither will French's descendants two
thousand years from now.
As to the saying that's bandied about by the mob of Jewish
pundits and their Evangelical barking dogs, to the effect that Jews can take
what they want without spending a moment in court simply by declaring that it
is inconceivable the court will rule otherwise – only a mental case would hold
such an opinion. If that case is also an attorney, he should be sent to Devil's Island where he'll do hard labor for the rest of
his life.
And if that attorney continues to say that Israel's
government sits on Israeli land and can remain on it with or without
negotiating a land swap with the Palestinians, he must spend his nights in a
jail cell equipped with a loudspeaker blaring all nightlong his own recording
of the sentence: I am an insult to my profession and my race.
Now a serious question: Does David French deserve to be
insulted in that manner? The answer is yes, because that's how to make him
drink from the cup of his own evil. Look what he said about others:
“An unholy mixture of anti-Semites and eliminationists have
sought to drive the Jewish people into the sea … Working through the U.N. and
enabled by Soviet-bloc (and later) European allies, these anti-Semites and
eliminationists have waged unrelenting 'lawfare' against Israel … A cowardly
European community goes along, perpetuating injustice … The world's Islamic
countries are often motivated by vile anti-Semitic bias, and their populations
are shot-through with bigotry”.