Richard Cohen who writes a column asked this question:
'What's the Obama Doctrine?' And he answered it like this: 'A shrug of the
shoulders.' In fact, these two parts make up the title of his latest column. It
was published on November 28, 2016 in the Washington Post.
The column is about President Obama's reaction to the
passing of Cuba 's
Fidel Castro. In keeping with the Jewish effort to make the noise that diverts
attention from the horror stories the Jews are playing in occupied Palestine , Cohen has unleashed a diatribe against Obama as
if nothing was more important than the bloodsucking needs of Israel , always Israel
and no one but Israel .
He begins the column with this locution: “We finally have an
Obama Doctrine. It is the 223 words on the death of Fidel Castro.” He does not
say exactly whom he means by “We,” but looking at Obama's eight years
stewardship of the American
Republic
Obama gets into the driver's seat, grabs the economic
steering wheel, and with a 'no drama Obama' steady hand, guides the bus to a
safe landing on the highway of economic salvation and steady growth. He thus
saves his country if not the world from an assured depression. It is no
exaggeration, therefore, to say that Obama inherited an economy in tatters from
his predecessor; and is handing it a healthy economy to his successor. Miracle
or not, Barack Obama put Humpty Dumpty back together again.
Still, compared to what Obama should have done for Israel but did
not, this accomplishment is considered of no consequence to Richard Cohen and
the Jews of his ilk. So the question to ask is this: What exactly do these characters
want?
As a matter of fact, Cohen has said what it is that they
want. On this occasion, like all other occasions, they would have wanted moral
judgment, indignation, justice, a mention of history, and sympathy for the
injured, he says. Because Obama failed to give them any of this, history will
condemn him, Cohen asserts. What he means is that we should forget about the
economic bus and what came of that event because what's important is that
Castro made victims, “some of whom might have expected Obama to acknowledge
their suffering”.
And here is the part that annoyed Cohen the most: “The
president expressed no values at all. He ignored the past and focused on the
future. 'During my presidency, we worked hard to put the past behind us,' the
president said.” Well, my friend, to forgive and forget being a Christian
value, it annoyed the Jew enough to accuse the president of having no values at
all. But why is this of concern to him? Because of the following:
“Castro has represented a litmus test for the American left
… He had an excellent health service, they insisted. For some, it was enough
that Castro loathed capitalism and was America 's enemy. Like uncle Ho,
Uncle Joe and even Mao, those attributes put him on many a dorm-room poster. In
his statement, Obama looked forward to a 'future' in which Cuba and the United States have a better
relationship”.
Is that it? Are these the reasons why the Jews of a certain
bent hate the fact that Obama did not hop in front of a television camera and
barked a full-throated anti-Castro diatribe? Or is there something we missed?
Actually, there is one more thing. It is this:
“The president has abided the Syrian slaughter without
showing much disgust. He drew a red line and then walked away from it. His
failure to enforce it has allowed the Syrian regime, the Russians and Hezbollah
to kill with impunity. The Obama Doctrine comes down to a shrug of the
shoulders”.
But what does that mean in practice? It means that Barack
Obama has elevated the Syrians, the Russians and the Lebanese to the level of
Israeli Jews. The man is supposed to shrug his shoulders only when Jews kill
with impunity. Now that he broke with tradition, there is no telling how far
down the slope others will slide without America trying to stop them.
The result of Obama's lack of indignation is that the day
will come when someone who slides down that slope will bump into Israel at the
bottom of the pit.
What will happen then? Will they join the bloodsucking feast
and share in what is now a Jewish exclusivity? This is so horrifying, it is
unthinkable.