Thursday, December 22, 2016

He failed to mention the Occupation

Do you want to know how the Jews negotiate for themselves and for Israel? How it is that they have managed to turn the US Congress into their private toilet? Read the article that came under the title: “Israel Is Ready for a Reset at the U.N.,” written by Danny Danon, Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, and published on December 21, 2016 in the New York Times.

He basically says to the new secretary general of the UN, gimme this and gimme that. When you're done fulfilling this task, gimme me more of everything. And when you've done all this, I'll think up a few more ways that you can be useful to us.

Danon starts his argument by complaining: “Our critics single out my country [Israel] for unwarranted and excessive attention while giving a pass to Syria and North Korea.” But Israel is the one that's occupying another people, the Palestinians. Neither Syria nor North Korea occupies someone else's territory or people. That's the difference between the two situations.

There was a time when Syria was asked by Lebanon and the Arab League to send troops into Lebanon to help calm a civil war that was triggered by Israel's aggression against that country. Even though this was not a Syrian occupation of Lebanon, Syria came under heavy criticism after only a few years when it was thought it had overstayed its welcome. Compare that with half a century of savage Israeli occupation of Palestine, and you'll understand why Israel is attracting the attention of the world.

Danon goes on to say that Israel expects to be treated as equally as the other states. No; that's not how it works. Everyone is treated according to the way they behave. Syria was condemned when it stayed too long in Lebanon even though it was not occupying Lebanon. Indonesia was condemned till it vacated East Timor. South Africa was condemned when its White minority was “occupying” its Black majority. Israel is condemned, and will continue to be condemned as long as it continues to occupy Palestine. Try understanding this simple principle, Danny, before you get on your keyboard again and write – well, like a Jew.

And complaining about antisemitism is what he does next. He writes: “Recently, there has been an increase in anti-Semitic statements at the United Nations.” Now guess how he proposes to remedy this situation. Well, in a typically Jewish fashion, he goes to the top of the hierarchy and demands that the highest authority take the trouble to command respect for the Jew. Here is how he put it: “The secretary General should warn ambassadors that they will be shunned at the United Nations”.

But what did the ambassadors say that merits they be warned and shunned? They said the following, according to Danny Danon: “Israel is harvesting the organs of slain Palestinians; it is committing a 'final solution' against the Palestinian people; a comparison was made between Israel's actions to those of the Nazis...”

The fact is that the harvesting of Palestinian organs was admitted to by those who committed the horrific acts. As to the mention of the final solution, and the comparison with the Nazis... well, these are opinions expressed by people who are disposed to understand the principles of democracy, not those who fake it to fool the mentally retarded in the private Jewish toilet that is the American Congress.

And if you believe this is the worst that a Jew will do, wait till you see what Danon does next. He writes this: “Equality also means ending unfair support for one side. The Palestinian cause receives disproportionate budget appropriations at the United Nations”.

This is from characters that just received 38 billion dollars to buy weapons with which to maintain the occupation of Palestine. And when they got the money, they turned around and tore their entrails out of their bellies screaming that the Palestinians received the equivalent of 15 million dollars to feed and educate the children. That is disproportionate in favor of the Palestinians, they say.

The only thing we can do in the face of this butchery of human logic, is to shake our heads and murmur: What can be more savage, more primitive and more Jewish than this?