There is an old saying, and there is one that's closely
related to it. The old one goes like this: “When God intends to destroy
someone, he first renders them mad.” The one that's closely related exists in
the form of a question and an answer. It goes like this: “When do you know that
a habitual thief is about to do himself in? When he starts to justify his
robberies on the ground that his victims do not deserve what they have”.
This is the image that best reflects where the
Jewish-Israeli lobby stands at this point in time. Its operators had all kinds
of excuses justifying the Jewish habit of living off the avails of robbery.
They fashioned an excuse to suit each epoch, and the one they have for the
modern era began with the claim that the Jews have the right to steal
Palestinian properties because Jewish violinists from Eastern
Europe made the desert bloom by sticking their golden fingers into
the desert sand. This made the trees grow, they claim, which is why the Negev Desert
When the people of the world got tired of that hokum, the
Jewish lobbyists found another excuse why Israel should be praised (but is
not) for killing Palestinians and stealing their properties. They admit that in
Israel ,
they import losers from around the world and ask them if they wish to rob the
Christians and Muslims of Palestine. When the losers vote yes, which they do
each time, the lobbyists say that Israel has democratically voted yes to
thievery, and this makes the practice Jewish legitimate.
But then, there remains the reality that Israel still occupies the Western part of the
Syrian Golan Heights, having been booted out of every other place it tried to
steal outside of Palestine 's West
Bank . And so, the Jews needed to tailor-make an excuse that would
justify keeping the Golan. You'll find that excuse in an article which came
under the title: “The United Nations General Assembly [GA], the Golan, and
Theater of the Absurd,” written by Elliott Abrams and published on December 3,
2016 on the website of the Council on Foreign relations.
Elliott Abrams, whose infamous logic would nauseate a
platoon of angels and one of devils, begins the article by complaining that:
“The UN commemorated once again 'International Day of Solidarity with the
Palestinian people' and passed six anti-Israel resolutions.” He goes on to
describe the resolutions as “ranging from the despicable to the absurd,” and
adds that they have nothing to do with reality. He then selects one of the
resolutions and discusses it in detail.
It is the one entitled “The Syrian Golan,” he says. He does
not like many things about it – ranging from those who sponsored it, to what
the resolution demands, to its intended beneficiary. He mocks the descriptive
names that were given to two of the sponsors: the Plurinational
State of Bolivia ,
and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela . And he demeans a number
of other sponsors by calling them: a bunch of Arab states.
The intended beneficiary of the resolution is Syria , and the following – in brief – is what it
says: “The GA determines that the occupation of the Syrian Golan constitutes a
stumbling block in the way of achieving peace in the region … the GA demands
that Israel
withdraw from the Syrian Golan in implementation of the relevant Security
Council resolutions”.
And this is where Abrams – in the name of all the
self-appointed leaders of the Jews – does himself in, inflicting irreparable
damage to his cause … whatever it may be. That is, he sets himself up as the
iconic Jewish leader whom current and aspiring leaders should try to emulate.
He does that by foretelling a future that in reality is nothing more than the
description of his daytime fantasy.
He begins the argument by asking a question: “What would
happen were Israel
to withdraw from the Golan?” He answers with a series of other questions meant
to represent his responses. His ultimate point is that ISIS
will try to overrun and slaughter the Druze, and that the Iranian-backed
militias would take parts of the Golan. He also says that Assad's
Iranian-backed army or the forces of Hezbollah will try to seize it. And he
predicts that if this were to happen, dire consequences will follow for the
people who live in the Golan, Northern Israel and Jordan .