Are monkeys smart enough to rate the IQ of humans? Well, you may not find monkeys on this Planet of the Humans known as Earth, who will want to talk about that. But we found two on the Planet of the Monkeys who were engaged in a conversation that hints at some interesting clues regarding this matter.
You
may not know it, but in the imagination of fiction writers where anything is
possible, there exists a planet that is the twin of the Earth. Something
happened not long ago, and the monkeys on that planet began to develop language
similar to humans. They did not replace humans, mind you, but learned to live
with them as third-class citizens, doing the kind of work that humans cannot do
as well, such as climb trees and harvest fruits like coconuts and dates.
On
that planet, each human family of the Chosen is given a large swath of land
called a fiefdom where they live with second-class commoners named Goyim and a
number of hard-working monkeys. Other commoners have fiefdoms as well, but not
as big as those of the Chosen. And they too have monkeys that help them do the
work they cannot do as well.
The
monarchy that runs the affairs of the Planet, owns half the lands of the planet
where the fiefdoms collectively make up the other half. Being a benevolent Goyim
elected by the masses to be King of the Planet, the monarch has set aside a
large swath of his land, and turned it into a playground for the monkeys. He
also decreed that all human commoners and all monkeys shall have a day off each
week, for the humans to worship their gods as they wish, and for the monkeys to
have a field day in the playground that’s exclusively assigned to them.
It
was in that playground that we met the two monkeys who were engaged in a
conversation about the level of human intelligence. We caught the part of it
that went like this:
MONKEY 1: So, you’re telling me, you really believe
that your human master isn’t smart enough to even be a monkey. Is that it?
MONKEY 2: Yes, that’s what I believe, because he had
the opportunity to do the right thing, but did the wrong thing instead.
MONKEY 1: What exactly should he have done, that he
didn’t do in your estimation?
MONKEY 2: He should have
planted his land with banana and nut trees but he didn’t. Instead, he planted
corn to feed the chicken, and vegetables of all kind to feed his human family.
MONKEY 1: Does it mean, you
believe that planting the foods monkeys love to eat, would have proved him smart?
MONKEY 2: Yes, that’s what I
believe. It would have made him look smart like a monkey. Instead, he now looks
mediocre like do most humans.
MONKEY 1: I believe so too.
And now I know what a smart monkey you are.
As
to you my dear human reader, you’ll know what this is about when you read the
Washington Times’ editorial that came under the title: “Iran nuclear deal, 2.0”
and was published on May 30, 2021. To get you started, here is a condensed
version of what came in that editorial:
“President
Biden appears intent on reliving the Age of Obama. Since the latter’s tenure
proved a study in mediocrity, worse things could happen. Like a burglar
hectoring police return the tools of his trade, Tehran’s demands that the US
indemnify financial losses suffered when Mr. Trump imposed economic sanctions.
The US maximum pressure campaign reduced Iranian currency reserves from $120
billion to $4 billion. Ending sanctions could hand the Islamic Republic $90
billion in frozen assets, and restart the regime’s oil sales worth an estimated
$50 billion annually. Netanyahu urged US Secretary of State not to rejoin the
nuclear deal with Iran. The Islamic regime’s centrifuges are currently
enriching uranium to 60 percent. The IAEA chief said: The Iranian program has
grown, become more sophisticated so the linear return to 2015 is no longer
possible”.
You’ll
soon get a clear picture as to who the monkeys are and who the humans are in
this analogy. Consider for example that the editors pointed to the Iranians
demanding that they be indemnified for the losses they incurred when Donald
Trump and his gang of madmen mugged Iran. What did the editors call the money
that people earn selling their resources and the products they fabricate? The
editors called them tools of a thief’s trade.
Think
about it now. Given that America has more money than anyone, this can only make
America the biggest thief in the history of Planet Earth. You must now admit,
my friend, that the editors of the Washington Times could not have been very smart
coming up with an analogy like this. Could they be representing the
banana-eating monkeys in this saga?
Moreover,
the editors of the Washington Times have accepted the notion that due to the
sanctions, Iran was compelled to improve its nuclear posture, and that the
progress it made in this field has reached a point from where it cannot be
dialed back. Does that not say that the Iranians are the smart ones whereas the
“Chosen” and their slaving Goyim are the backward specimen?
So
then, what about the editors of the Washington Times? Have they not proven they
are such mediocre journalists they should be doing jobs like clean floors
instead of coming up with one idiocy after another playing journalists?
Someone ought to tell them this.