There is a concept that’s very easy to understand but made difficult to grasp by those who dabble in useless haggling.
The
concept is that of making equivalences between objects or events; something we
all do dozens of times every day because it is an efficient way to communicate.
For example, if I believe that someone habitually takes a harsh line against
the opponents of the country, I can recite a long sentence every time I speak
of that person, or I can simply refer to him as a hawk.
This
does not mean I believe that a human being is physically the same as a bird of
prey. What it means is that the human in question and the bird of prey have a
similar temperament. Any intelligent person listening to my speech would know how
the reference to hawkishness applies to that person, and will not wonder if
there exist humans with wings or a beak, for example.
At
times, a simple word such as “hawk” would not be sufficient to convey the
similarities we see between two events. In this case, we use a short story
called “fable” that helps to demonstrate in a tangible way what would
essentially be an abstract idea or feeling. Here too, the story we tell need
not exactly match the event we parody since it is only meant to transmit an
idea or a feeling that is close to what the abstract event is supposed to
convey.
So
then, how much does the intrusion of the haggle in a debate, confuse the
meaning of the concept we refer to as equivalence? A good way to answer this
question is to give an example. Here is a fable that someone who wants to
convey a complicated kind of feeling, may tell you:
The
subculture I encountered on the other side of the divide, is so degenerate, it
leads an existence that extends well beyond the fringes of the civilized world.
In that place, the big fellows who run the clan do anything they want, and
nobody dares to oppose them. The guy with the loud voice signals his arrival by
bellowing, “here I come” and all those in the house freeze where they work,
stand, sit or sleep. He enters the house, beats anyone he wants, rapes anyone
he wants, eats whatever food he finds, breaks up whatever he dislikes, steals
whatever he likes, and walks away without anyone stopping him.
Hearing
this, you don’t use the word fable but use the synonym, allegory to ask if
there is anything close to this, that’s happening anywhere in the world. And
the answer is yes, it is happening all the time right here in America where the
Jew is the big guy, and the family in the house, is the politico-journalistic
unit that freezes when the Jew comes bellowing: Don’t you turn antisemitic on
me.
Here
is one of the big fellows — who goes by the name, Jackson Richman in real life
— telling his comrades what happened the last time he visited a house that
seemed to defy the norms of the subculture in which he lives. He told his real-life
story under the title: “Democrats, not Israel, are responsible for division,”
and had the thing published on June 15, 2021 in The Washington Examiner.
Here,
in condensed form, is what Richman is telling:
“Israel’s
Yair Lapid said Israel must fix its relationship with the Democratic Party; we
find ourselves with a Democratic White House and a Democratic Congress. They
are angry at us, and we need to change that. Lapid is wrong. The onus is on
Democrats, not Israel, to improve the relationship. The divide was cut when
Obama created daylight between the US and Israel. The rocky relationship with
Netanyahu started when Obama objected to Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
He then left. There wasn’t even the opportunity to pose with photographers. That
added salt to the wound. In 2015, the US led the effort to reach the Iran
nuclear deal. In 2016, Obama abstained from exercising the veto on a UNSC
anti-Israel resolution. Today, the congressional ‘Squad’ promotes an
antisemitic and ant-Israel agenda. Despite the Senate passing legislation to
tackle the BDS movement, the House has failed to take up that legislation. In
the war with Hamas, Biden took a page out of the Obama playbook and called on
Israel to exercise restraint. Israel should be angry at the Democrats, not the
other way around”.
As
can be seen, while Israel’s Yair Lapid is cognizant of the reality that Israel
is the supplicant parasite that lives off the American host, thus was careful
how to express his message to America, Jackson Richman the Jew who pretends to
be American when in reality, his heart and soul are in Israel — played the role
of the guy with the loud voice, described in the fable above, and bellowed the
following cry: No, no, no; it should be the other way around.
To
lay bare his mutilated concept of equivalence, Jackson Richman behaved like the
big guy in the degenerate subculture on the other side of the divide, and came
up with a long haggling rant that is beyond the fringes of the civilized world
we live in.
Here,
in its bare essence, is what Richman has said: It is the American host that owes
everything to the parasite which already lives off Palestine, and is now making
inroads in America.
And no one dares to stop him or stop all those like him, who are in the business of taking America down the Jewish sewer.