Thursday, June 17, 2021

The revealing Anatomy of a fake Narrative

 How do you put together a narrative that people will ardently believe for a period of time, but then proves to be a fake narrative—a veritable hoax; one that has no relation whatsoever to reality? The answer is that you do it by creating one lie after another, and do it for a long period of time.

 

Clifford D. May who is master at this sort of thing, has contributed to the creation of one such narrative. Reading his article on the subject, and reading between the lines, reveal the content of a hoax that took decades to put together. It must be said, however, that Clifford May did not start the narrative. In fact, it had been in the works before he appeared on the scene. But when he came, he embraced it passionately and worked to complete it. This puts him in a good position to tell the ins and outs of constructing a narrative that is such a sham at its foundation, it can only be considered a certifiable hoax.

 

Clifford May’s article came under the title: “Iran’s nuclear secrets have been exposed,” and the subtitle: “But President Biden has not revised his policies in response.” It was published on June 15, 2021 in The Washington Times.

 

Reading the article, it does not take you long to realize that you are navigating the troubled waters of a massive lie. This happens because Clifford May has committed a grandiose error while trying to convince his readers that the Israelis conducted a fantastic and flawless spy operation; one that should have prevented President Biden from returning to the Iran nuclear deal, but did not. Quoting a Mossad spokesman, here is what Clifford May said about the supposed Israeli magnificent spy operation: “Planning required two years and included the construction of the replica of the warehouse”.

 

This would be a warehouse in Iran that was used as archive where the schematics, computer disks and so on, relating to the bomb, were supposedly stored. Well, this should strike you as odd because to build a replica of an Iranian warehouse in Israel, means it must have been a place known to many people. And this is the place where Iran’s leaders foolishly stored their highly secretive materials, according to Clifford May. Not only that, but he also said that in addition, “The archive also revealed that Iran’s rulers have a host of undeclared nuclear sites and activities.” Were these people so stupid as to put all their eggs in a basket to which many unfriendly people, some of them mortal foes, had easy access?

 

You begin to suspect that Clifford May is not writing history, but writing a second-rate novel of the kind that starts like this: “It was a cold and dreary night…” But look, that’s almost exactly how Clifford May started his story, except that he omitted the word “dreary.” Here is how he actually wrote it: “The story begins on a cold night in January 2018 when Israeli agents broke into a warehouse … Twenty agents were trained for the mission; none of them were Israelis.” Oh yeah! Did he say Israeli agents, none of them Israeli? Whose intelligence are you insulting, Cliff?

 

From here on, the veracity of the story keeps going downhill in your judgment. This happens especially when you learn that May has based his story on a book that David Albright wrote on the subject. Who is David Albright, you ask? He is the one that brought you the invasion of Iraq. As Ronald Reagan would say: If you liked the invasion of Iraq, you’ll love the one that David Albright is preparing for Iran.

 

You see, my friend, Albright was a member of the group that decided Saddam Hussein had the weapons of mass destruction he did not have. How did Albright turn out to be so wrong? This happened, he says, not because his group of inspectors found something damning in Iraq, but because Saddam Hussein said he did not have such weapons. And since David Albright was conditioned by Jewish propaganda to believe that Hussein does not tell the truth, Albright and his gang of idiots decided it must be that Hussein had the bomb that makes the mushroom cloud. If you’ll remember, this is the one that W. Bush feared so much, he ordered the invasion and subsequent destruction of Iraq, an act that is now recognized as being America’s worst mistake ever.

 

So, there you have it. We’re looking at a David Albright who made mental deductions that turned out to be as murderous as a twenty first century Attila the Hun; one that’s equipped with stealth warplanes and precision bombs. We’re also looking at a Clifford May whose assessment of this Attila, is that he is an esteemed American expert. What should we make of all that?

 

Well, the reasonable thing to do is to consider that our collective intelligence has been insulted by both Clifford May and David Albright. They do it to us by maintaining the relentless effort to sabotage America’s return to the Iran nuclear deal. This should compel us, in return, to reject their proposals, whatever they are, in whichever form they come.

 

Many of us remember that the information which those two characters want us to believe is new, is not new at all. It’s been around for many years, pointing to nothing that would damn the Iranians or their peaceful pursuit of a legitimate civilian nuclear program.

 

This makes it so that the deal which former President Barack Obama and four countries negotiated with Iran is a sound deal, and America should return to it so that the world can get back to normal again.