The accusation of antisemitism is leveled verbally and in written form hundreds of times a day. Those who say it or write it aim to injure the target of their accusation. In fact, there was a time when the accusation had a deadly or “canceling” effect on the victim. But things are changing now.
Of course, someone
that is falsely accused of antisemitism, and gets injured as a result, can sue
the accuser because it is easy to prove that the accusation was made. It is
also easy to prove injury if and when such has resulted. On the other hand, the
accuser would have a difficult time proving that his accusation of antisemitism
was real, because such proof requires interpretation of what was said, and requires
proof that the accused intended to demean the Semitic people — a very difficult thing to do especially in view of the fact that those
who level such accusations, are the Jews who are no more related to the Semitic
ethnicity than Netanyahu could be the brother of Hanan Ashrawi.
So, why is it that
people did not run to the courts to sue a Jew every time that one of them
accused the innocent of antisemitism? Had the victims done so, half the adult
Jewish population would be bankrupt by now, having to pay reparations to all
those they injured. And half of those so condemned would be in jail for engaging
in willful criminal slander of innocent people with the intent of causing
severe injury.
The reality is that
people did not run to the media or the courts because, to most of them, hearing
the accusation of antisemitism was like hearing a dog fart. It caused them a
few minutes of discomfort but nothing worse. However, to a handful of other people,
running to the courts would have validated the accusers’ claim that the charge
is non-trivial, which is a requisite to recognizing the accusers as being bona
fide Semites. Because this would have been a false recognition, even that
handful of victims chose to treat the accusation of antisemitism like a dog’s
fart — and move on with their lives.
With the passage of
time, things gradually got more complicated. It is that the rabbis who started
the conquest of America had disciples that grew up learning under the tutelage of
the masters how to put their talent in the service of Israel and World Jury.
Turned loose on the public, the disciples hit the ground running. They
infiltrated the media, the think tanks and the government institutions where
they put their hands on the levers of power and gripped them tightly.
This is when people
like yours truly — those of us
who were cancelled and those who escaped that fate — were able to get on the
internet and make our voices heard. We had discovered that for everyone of us
there were literally thousands of Jews working as Fifth Columnists serving
Israel, and being paid with taxpayer’s money to sabotage America from the
inside.
When we began to
expose that reality, the Jews counterattacked by slandering us as a group with
accusations of antisemitism. Since they will not un-cancel the cancelation of
me or others like me whenever they decide to attack us personally, the Jews never
named us by name. But they saw other personalities and institutions in the
public eye, and so attacked them by name. Among these are well known members of
Congress, and an organization whose acronym is CAIR.
You’ll see how this
is done when you study the article that came under the title: “Islamist bigots
are in no position to accuse Jews of backing hate,” and the subtitle: “The
anti-Semitic advocacy group CAIR issued a report intended to intimidate Jewish
institutions into defunding organizations that monitor hate. It shouldn’t be
taken seriously.” The article was written by Jonathan S. Tobin and was
published on January 12, 2022 in Jewish News Syndicate.
Tobin says that
CAIR, which stands for Council on American-Islamic Relations, is an antisemitic
organization, and accuses it of having ties to terrorist groups. This is an
accusation that could not be proven in a court of law, which is why no one but
the Jews leveled it, and no one—not even the Jews—took it to court. When you contrast this performance
against the fact that the Jews have been begging America to kneecap the
Palestinians on their way to the International Criminal Court where they plan
to prove the terrorist nature of Zionism, you’ll see a glaring example of the
Jewish habit of attributing to others, the evil they see in themselves.
Reading the Tobin
article, you become aware of two trends. One trend reveals that to call others
antisemitic, is rooted in the Jewish belief that they are beyond reproach,
therefore must be superior to all the others. The other trend is that the
belief in their superiority, gives the Jews the right to tell others (including
well adjusted, moderate Jews) how to think and behave when addressing Jewish issues.
The following is a condensed compilation of excerpts that highlight the two
trends:
“The
anti-Semitic advocacy group CAIR issued a report intended to intimidate Jewish
institutions into defunding organizations that monitor hate. It shouldn’t be
taken seriously. Philanthropies, both Jewish and non-Jewish, need to ask
themselves whether it makes sense to allow an organization that was not merely
founded on anti-Semitic principles, but continues to this day to be a haven and
a support group for Jew-hatred, to be the arbiter of what is or isn’t
prejudice”.