This article is a response to the one written by Andrea Widburg under the title: “An AOC staffer is both antisemitic and ignorant,” and published on December 31, 2021 in the American Thinker.
The dispute between
Widburg and the AOC staffer, is their affair and both are capable of defending
their point of view. I am not getting involved in this fight; I’m only shedding
light on the layers of lies and distortions which are the regular falsifications
of the Jewish propaganda machine — repeated in the
Widburg article.
Before we get into
the history of what happened in that region of the world, let’s establish what’s
normal, and separate it from what’s abnormal. And so, with regard to the
migration of individuals, the most authoritative example I can give, is myself.
When I thought I’d have better opportunities in Canada than in Egypt where I
was born and lived for a while, I applied to migrate to Canada and was
accepted. This is what’s normal.
Now, 58 years
later, I cannot go back to Egypt and claim the right of ownership to something
that used to be mine on account that I was there previously or that my
ancestors were. If I argued this much, I would be trying to pull off the
abnormal. And yet, this is what the European Jews are doing, having no proof
that they have any connection to Palestine anymore than I have to Rome on
account that I am of the Roman Catholic religious persuasion.
With regard to the
right of nations, the norm since the end of World War II and the establishment
of the United Nations, has been to freeze the borders where they are between
the countries. Adjustments can be made only through negotiations between the
concerned parties. But where colonialism persists, armed resistance aimed at
ending this situation is tolerated. Thus, Syria could not take back Lebanon,
Iraq could not take back Kuwait, France could not annex Algeria, Argentina
could not take back the Falkland Islands, and Rhodesia became Zimbabwe — all with the blessings of
the international community.
And yet, this is
what Israel is doing, having changed the name of what used to be the West Bank
of the Jordan River, to Judea and Samaria, annexing it piece by piece and
getting away with the crime when Adolph Hitler could not get away with the
smaller crime of annexing the Sudetenland.
With regard to the
system called “apartheid,” the word itself defines what the system is about. It’s
about keeping people who are perceived to be different, “apart” from each
other. The differences can be the color of the skin, the religious affiliation,
the ethnic lineage or whatever.
To respond to those
considerations while navigating the Jewish narrative, pundits such as Andrea
Widburg tailor-made lies to pushback against the arguments raised against
Israel’s conduct. When tackled alone, each lie opens the possibility of
starting an endless bout of haggling that leads to nowhere. But when considered
as a group, the lies prove to be a construct that’s shaped like layers of onion
skins with the layers standing in contradiction to each other.
For example, one of
the Jewish layers of lies, was to the effect that the European Jews who
migrated to Palestine were peaceful people who did so legally. The lie goes on
to tell of the Palestinians who massacred the helpless Jews instead of
welcoming them. Whereas haggling over this lie can go on for ever, it can be
cut short by pointing to the lie that’s carried by another layer of the onion.
It is the one that says the Jews were so strong, they beat the Arab armies that
came to push them back to where they had come from. At times, the number of
attacking Arab armies were said to be three … then five … then seven … or maybe
just three … Hell, choose the number that suits your mood.
Still, the crucial question
remains unanswered: Were the Jews so weak, they got crushed by the Palestinian
farmers? Or were they so strong they crushed all the Arab armies combined? Only
a Jew could tell lies of this magnitude and show no shame.
The Jewish
narrative does not end here. It conveniently goes on to tell — as did Andrea Widburg in
her article — what was
needed that suited the current situation. Here is what she wrote:
“Thanks to the
850,000 Jews welcomed into Israel after the Arab nations summarily expelled
beginning in 1948 and continuing through the 1970s, Israel has a huge
population of Jews who don't have a drop of European blood in
them. Genetically, they are true Middle Easterners, with their
Jewish lineage going back well over 2,000 years”.
Widburg needed to
say those things because the question at this time concerns the ethnic identity
of Israelis aside from the reality that they are descendants of European
converts to Judaism, therefore have no “biological” connection to Palestine.
But invoking the big lie, put Widburg in contradiction to another claim; one
that is frequently made by the Jews.
That claim concerns
the question of how it happened that Jews from around the world ended in
occupied Palestine. It is that the Jewish narrative was made to invent a lie that
suits each case. The aim of the Jewish leaders being to establish a nation for
the Jews, however artificial it may be, they wanted to bring Jews into
Palestine from where they lived in large numbers. Given that those of Europe
had a difficult time carrying on with life where they were, it was not
necessary to entice them to go to Israel. Next there were Jews in large numbers
in the Arab countries, the Soviet Union and Ethiopia.
Because the Soviet
Union would not let the Jews leave the country without reimbursing the
government for the free education and healthcare they received, the Jewish
leaders organized protests to parade in front of the Soviet embassies in
Western capitals. The protestors chanted a refrain that was supposedly used by
Moses to implore the Pharaoh to “let my people go”. The Jewish lie now peddled
by the like of Widburg, is to the effect that the Soviets would not let the
Jews emigrate to Israel to please the Arabs who did not want Israel to grow and
become a bigger threat to them.
When it came to
Ethiopia, the story was that Jews were beginning to leave Israel in droves.
Worried that they will become a minority between the River and the Sea, the
Jewish leaders decided to compensate for the loss by bringing in the Ethiopian
Jews. And so they did. But what do you think was the lie put out to hide the
truth. Here it is in Widburg’s own words:
“That was the year
that Ethiopian political instability was so extreme that Jews around the world
feared for the safety of the tribe in Ethiopia, a tribe of Black Jews. Israel
airlifted over 14,000 from Ethiopia to Israel”.
As to the Jews in
the Arab countries, the Israelis tried to lure them to Israel by broadcasting,
through regular and pirate radio stations, stories that tell how pleasant life
was in Israel, and how lousy it will become in the Arab countries. When this
did not work, the Jews recruited a number of traitors and paid them well to
sabotage installations where they lived, the way that the Iranian traitors are operating
now.
When this did not
work as well as expected for Israel, the Jews began to blow up Western
installations in the Arab countries, including the American embassy in Cairo. In
this case, they made sure to frame Egyptian Jews for the crime so as to damage
the good relation that existed between them and the Arab governments as well as
the Arab populations. But what do you think was the lie put out to hide the
truth? As noted earlier, here is the lie that Andrea Widburg has been peddling:
Israel has welcomed the Jews that the Arab nations have summarily expelled
between 1948 and the 1970s. The truth is that not a single Jew was retained in
Egypt against their will, and no one was expelled.
As can be seen, the
sick Jewish logic makes it so that the Arabs expelled the Jews who went to
Israel that the Arabs did not want to see get big or strong, the reason why
they push the Jews to go back to where they came from, which is the Arab
countries from where they were expelled in the first place.