There is nothing more pathetic than the sight of grown men
engaged in a war game using wooden guns and empty shells. No, they are not
playing to exercise their muscles or to entertain themselves; they are engaged
in a war that's as real to them as the mental disorder that's ravaging their
brains.
These are the self-appointed leaders of the Jews who do not
necessarily belong to a pro-Jewish or a pro-Israel organization, but are
prominent personalities for being in journalism or politics or the world of
entertainment. They retain their positions because they do not oppose the
organized groups that support the Jewish or Israeli agendas. In fact, not only
do these people refrain from opposing such agendas, they often use their
positions as a platform to actively promote them.
One notorious character of that kind has participated in a
most notorious incident for history to use as the iconic moment when America stepped
onto the path that took it from the realm of the superpower to that of the
super-joke. His name is Thomas L. Friedman, the so-called Journalist that stood
on the foreign soil of Israel ,
and sent a warning on America 's
Public Broadcasting System to the President of the United
States , that if he did not invade Iraq , he will
suffer serious consequences. And the rest is history … sad history … bitter
history.
The silver lining in all of this is that the fear mongering
– done by the self appointed leaders of the Jews and the organized groups
promoting their agendas through whispers, bribery and blackmail – has all but
lost its teeth. More and more of the rank and file Jews who used to serve as
obedient foot soldiers under the command of fake leaders, are turning against
those who took them for suckers and got wealthy and powerful at their expense …
they who now make up the silent majority in the Jewish community.
So then, what do you think those fallen former leaders are
trying to do now? They are trying to regain their old glory by using a medley
of approaches that combine many of the techniques that worked in the past but
no longer work in the modern era of social media where the accusation of
anti-Semitism elicits a yawn, and a rolling of the eyes among the cyber
audiences.
Three recent pieces demonstrate what these people are up to
now. They are (1) “Barack Obama's inability to grasp reality,” an article
written by Wesley Pruden, published on August 10, 2015 in The Washington Times.
(2) “Obama rewrites history to sell Iran deal to American Jews,” an
article written by Abraham H. Miller, published on August 10, 2015 in the
Washington Times. (3) “Here's What's Wrong with Obama's Case for the Iran
Deal,” an article written by Dennis Prager, published on August 11, 2015 in
National Review Online.
Despite the multitude of Jewish voices that have been
chanting: war, war, war ... bomb Iran, bomb Iran, bomb Iran – many of which
were pointed at and rebuffed on this website – Wesley Pruden is cracking open
the belly of his readers who cannot stop laughing at the suggestion which he
put in this form: “Who would start such a war? Obama doesn't say. As crazy as
the mullahs are, they are smart enough not to go to war against the United States .
We conclude that Mr. Obama is afraid that he might be the one to start the
war.”
As to Abraham Miller, he made the mistake of rebuffing the
President: “An accusation that is manifestly untrue – that American Jews and
pro-Israel groups are the same people who mobilized to push America into the ill-conceived war with Iraq ,” then
demonstrated that the President was correct. Look at this: “He [Obama]
complained about the millions spent running ads against the deal, a less than
subtle reference to the American Israel Public Affairs committee's (AIPAC)
campaign”. What can be more ambiguously clearer than that?
As to Dennis Prager, in trying to make the point that the
Iranians are worse than anything history has seen – people who would die just
to start a war – he took an approach that went head-on against what Wesley
Pruden had said a day earlier to the effect that Obama rather than the Iranians
would start the war. Here is how he put it: “The Soviet Union was headed by
people who valued their own lives and even those of their fellow countrymen
incomparably more than the Islamic leaders of Iran do.” Such clear ambiguity,
it’s almost heavenly!