Looking at the situation in the United States of America today,
four levels of treasonous conduct can be identified and cataloged.
The first and least offensive is that of someone born in a
different country and still feels emotionally attached to it. When a dispute
arises between his country of birth and the United States of America, the
country he adopted, he feels torn between the two, thus avoids siding – at
least publicly – with one or the other.
The second and somewhat more offensive level of treason is
that of someone born in a different country, and would side with it against the
United States of America no matter what the issues are or what the dispute is
about. But he will go no further than discuss with passion the causes to which
he adheres, and will avoid taking action that may carry consequences.
The third level of treason; one that borders on criminality
is that of someone born in the United States ,
and owes their loyalty to a foreign country with such intensity, they would
attack, at the moral level, anything that moves in America if it does not move in the
direction of the foreign country. They will proselytize the causes to which
they adhere, and would engage in low level sabotage such as pulling the plug –
not deliberately, of course, but by a deliberate accident – on a broadcast
where a guest is demoting one of their causes.
That hard-to-prove crime, as well as its analogous twin in
the print media – both bearing the unmistakable Jewish signature – are so
rampant these days, they add a stinky sort of noise to the already noisy ether
of disinformation you encounter in the Anglophile world … more than you would
anywhere else.
The fourth level of treason, one that might be considered
criminally minded in fact if not in law, is that of someone born or naturalized
American, and owing their loyalty to a foreign country. They would be so
attached to it they lobby everyone, especially the American legislators, asking
them to side against America
by helping implement the agenda of the foreign country. In practice, they
forgive that country the shortcomings that would anger them if committed in America ; and they praise it for accomplishments
that would leave them unmoved if achieved in America . Worse of all, this is a
double standard they wear like a badge of honor.
You can see an example of treason of the fourth kind in the
editorial that has appeared on August 22, 2015 under the title: “Schumer's
bravery,” published in the New York Daily News on August 22, 2015. The core
argument of the editors is this: “Chuck Schumer has shown impressive strength
and wisdom in opposing President Obama's nuclear deal with Iran .” Given
that opposition to the deal means siding with Israel
against America ,
both the editors of the Daily News and Chuck Schumer prove to be treasonous of
a sort. But which level of treason would that be?
We can tell which level it is by following their reasoning
as laid out in the rest of the editorial. It can be seen that the editors are
lamenting what they call the “blowback” which, in their view, has been furious.
They say that the pressure from the White House has been intense to the point
that a senate colleague of Schumer fell in line and was joined by another who
happens to be a defender of Israel; the House Representative from Manhattan.
Many others, say the editors, are now calling for Schumer to lose the position
he was slated to inherit as Democratic leader in the Senate when the current
leader retires at the end of this session.
But why is that lamentation symptomatic of a treasonous bent
of the worst kind? It is so because the pressure from the White House came in
response to what AIPAC and World Jewry and Israel have been doing in their
effort to pressure the American legislators to reject the nuclear deal. In
fact, the Judeo/Israeli lobby AIPAC is spending millions to advertise against
the deal, and spending millions more to take American legislators on junkets to
Israel where they hear from
the prime minister, and get commanded by him on how to betray their President
in Washington … thus advance the Judeo/Israeli
agenda at the expense of America .